|
TMNS | Sat 11-Mar-17 05:35 PM |
Member since 10th Jun 2009
2670 posts
| |
|
#67434, "Something I meant to say a while ago..."
|
Which IMM nerfed the pincer staff?
I was shocked at how infrequent it progged when I had it with Brondalorm. I spoke with other polearm users and was told it was the same for them.
Went from seeing it 2 out of every 10 rounds...to seeing it prog 2 out of every 100 rounds.
Pretty big untalked about nerf, IMHO.
|
|
|
|
pincer staff prog,
Scarabaeus,
15-Mar-17 08:44 AM, #6
TMNS notices everything,
Bemused,
15-Mar-17 06:07 PM, #7
Ash nazg durbatulûk, ash nazg gimbatul, ash nazg thr...,
TMNS,
15-Mar-17 07:32 PM, #8
Thanks.,
TMNS,
15-Mar-17 07:33 PM, #9
I agree.,
Athioles,
15-Mar-17 10:11 PM, #10
I found it strange too,
SideStrider,
14-Mar-17 07:04 PM, #4
Unless it happened 5+ years ago...,
Destuvius,
11-Mar-17 11:25 PM, #2
I'm inclined to believe you....,
TMNS,
12-Mar-17 01:58 PM, #3
RE: I'm inclined to believe you....,
Isildur,
14-Mar-17 10:59 PM, #5
Because felar,
Kstatida,
11-Mar-17 06:46 PM, #1
| |
  |
Bemused | Wed 15-Mar-17 06:07 PM |
Member since 15th Oct 2013
665 posts
| |
|
#67455, "TMNS notices everything"
In response to Reply #6
|
He's like the eye of Sauron sitting atop Mount Doom.
|
|
|
|
    |
TMNS | Wed 15-Mar-17 07:32 PM |
Member since 10th Jun 2009
2670 posts
| |
|
#67457, "Ash nazg durbatulûk, ash nazg gimbatul, ash nazg thr..."
In response to Reply #7
|
|
|
  |
TMNS | Wed 15-Mar-17 07:33 PM |
Member since 10th Jun 2009
2670 posts
| |
|
#67458, "Thanks."
In response to Reply #6
|
I'm not even sure I don't agree with the how often it progs now.
If I really had to choose, I'd say it did it too much before and it doesn't do it enough now.
Probably doesn't help at all, but yep.
|
|
|
|
    |
Athioles | Wed 15-Mar-17 10:11 PM |
Member since 09th Jan 2011
392 posts
| |
|
#67459, "I agree."
In response to Reply #9
|
It was horribly OP before. It's almost useless now.
Somewhere in between would be nice.
|
|
|
|
|
SideStrider | Tue 14-Mar-17 07:04 PM |
Member since 30th Dec 2007
208 posts
| |
|
#67449, "I found it strange too"
In response to Reply #0
|
I had while I was running around with Vhilhaxdun, but didn't particularly see the draw of it. Never really seemed to do a whole lot. Saw it proc. a few times, but the claw damage was just bleh, so I ditched it.
Granted I had been on receiving end of it, but had never actually had the weapon beforehand. I still ended up being confused as to why some many people coveted it when a large assortment of other polearms seemed to function better for me. That could have had something to do with being a giant and higher average weapons performed better for me.
|
|
|
|
  |
TMNS | Sun 12-Mar-17 01:58 PM |
Member since 10th Jun 2009
2670 posts
| |
|
#67445, "I'm inclined to believe you...."
In response to Reply #2
|
...since no IMM has ever stated a preference for changing the prog on the item...
But evidence in the last year or so says something happened. I could go through my logs and post stuff (Laesron and then Brondalorm) but honestly, I don't think I'm going to play a polearm spec again for at least a year so yeah.
|
|
|
|
|
Kstatida | Sat 11-Mar-17 06:46 PM |
Member since 12th Feb 2015
2214 posts
| |
|
#67435, "Because felar"
In response to Reply #0
|
|
|
|