|
Murphy | Wed 22-Jun-16 02:14 AM |
Member since 30th Dec 2010
1639 posts
| |
|
#63925, "Re-requesting a feature: Animal foci"
|
Give shapeshifters an option to choose their focus based on animal family. E.g. you choose canine major, snake minor, and you get four canine forms of respective tiers, and three snake forms.
So many role possibilities...
|
|
|
|
As a habitual shapeshifter player:,
Iunna,
22-Jun-16 01:00 PM, #7
I love your second idea.,
TMNS,
22-Jun-16 08:36 PM, #9
It would work with some form families,
Murphy,
22-Jun-16 08:42 PM, #10
I'm sure a shapeshifters are already too good and would...,
Shapa,
23-Jun-16 04:53 AM, #13
Clarification.,
Iunna,
23-Jun-16 09:17 AM, #14
I've made these request before....,
CD,
23-Jun-16 04:46 PM, #15
RE: I've made these request before....,
Bemused,
23-Jun-16 07:46 PM, #16
I would rather see "mixed" forms as a master-quest styl...,
Doof,
26-Jun-16 08:54 AM, #17
RE: I would rather see ,
Jormyr,
26-Jun-16 10:08 AM, #18
Hey, it's a gamble. Sometimes it pays off. :) ...,
Doof,
28-Jun-16 09:39 AM, #20
...reverse centaurs...,
Murphy,
28-Jun-16 10:39 AM, #21
so... Basically British. Nt ,
laxman,
28-Jun-16 11:18 AM, #22
Bwahahahaha,
Kstatida,
28-Jun-16 02:23 PM, #23
My dream was always offense and water to have a half sh...,
lurker,
26-Jun-16 12:31 PM, #19
I just want Laser Cats. NT,
TMNS,
28-Jun-16 08:11 PM, #24
A groupmate could wield you as a weapon! NT,
Saagkri,
09-Jul-16 09:40 PM, #26
RE: As a habitual shapeshifter player:,
SideStrider,
29-Jun-16 11:21 AM, #25
Sorry,
Kstatida,
22-Jun-16 07:28 AM, #1
Would still be random, and,
Murphy,
22-Jun-16 07:30 AM, #2
RE: Would still be random, and,
Kstatida,
22-Jun-16 07:32 AM, #3
No mixing with offense etc.,
Murphy,
22-Jun-16 08:16 AM, #4
Major revamp of forms for the sake of role flavour,
Kstatida,
22-Jun-16 08:40 AM, #5
Major revamp is something else.,
Murphy,
22-Jun-16 08:51 PM, #11
So foci doesn't matter?,
lasentia,
22-Jun-16 09:27 AM, #6
Meh,
NoobAgain,
22-Jun-16 08:35 PM, #8
RE: Meh,
Kstatida,
23-Jun-16 03:16 AM, #12
| |
|
Iunna | Wed 22-Jun-16 01:00 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
473 posts
| |
|
#63932, "As a habitual shapeshifter player:"
In response to Reply #0
|
I like the system how it is. Yeah, sometimes I'd rather have form X vs form Y, maybe even for role purposes - but you already know going into the class there's an element of surprise to it (which I think is part of the charm).
From a powergaming standpoint, who wouldn't take something amphibious just to ensure they'd get a land/water regen form, if you're guaranteeing that as an option? Yeah, regen isn't as good as it used to be thanks to dam redux, but regen is regen is regen.
I'd rather see something like cheap lower level edges similar to bones/dice that allow you to swap out lower tier forms. (Less codework considering structure is already there?)
OR
Incorporate some kind of automated lich/mummy-esque quest were you can "request" to learn a specific form, have your guildmaster send you on said quest to gather things specific to learning that form. (More codework)
|
|
|
|
  |
TMNS | Wed 22-Jun-16 08:36 PM |
Member since 10th Jun 2009
2670 posts
| |
|
#63935, "I love your second idea."
In response to Reply #7
Edited on Wed 22-Jun-16 08:36 PM
|
Obviously, I would exclude quest forms.
I would probably set the quest to have a requirement of hours like 150.
And probably some type of "pts" system where you need to have 1 benchmark to keep from abuse: 30 quests completed; 30 PKS; 100 hrs in a cabal; 1500 IMM xp; 1 Role Contest Win/Place.
As a complete aside, would be cool if you could also swap out lower tier forms like you mentioned. Whenever I play anything that doesn't have an air or amphibious form, I always wish I could swap out 2 lower-tier forms for 1 lower tier form that has fly or is amphibious. For example, if I went Utility/Offense, perhaps I could give up gazelle and snow badger for shikra.
But yeah that's a lot of coding.
|
|
|
|
  |
Murphy | Wed 22-Jun-16 08:42 PM |
Member since 30th Dec 2010
1639 posts
| |
|
#63936, "It would work with some form families"
In response to Reply #7
Edited on Wed 22-Jun-16 08:42 PM
|
Others it would be OP, so don't allow them.
|
|
|
|
  |
Shapa | Thu 23-Jun-16 04:44 AM |
Member since 22nd Jun 2006
252 posts
| |
|
#63947, "I'm sure a shapeshifters are already too good and would..."
In response to Reply #7
Edited on Thu 23-Jun-16 04:53 AM
|
I don't want to see bazilion of tigers/lions, cheetahs and owls/falcons/eagles and all with second regen form.
|
|
|
|
    |
Iunna | Thu 23-Jun-16 09:17 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
473 posts
| |
|
#63950, "Clarification."
In response to Reply #13
|
Those ideas were specifically for lower tier forms, I realize that second quest idea wasn't as clear. I don't think the current system for end forms needs to change - that's what dice/bones are for.
|
|
|
|
      |
CD | Thu 23-Jun-16 04:46 PM |
Member since 05th Jul 2012
279 posts
| |
|
#63953, "I've made these request before...."
In response to Reply #14
|
Edge to swap out second/third tiers forms. I also firmly believe major foci should get two second tier forms. The second coming at the 37-39 range. This also creates a little more utility/dynamic. It would also create a greater tactic means in the 30's and make it less dull from 31-42
Also a greater chance lower tier forms would be utilized at hero for various tactics.
|
|
|
|
        |
Bemused | Thu 23-Jun-16 07:46 PM |
Member since 15th Oct 2013
665 posts
| |
|
#63963, "RE: I've made these request before...."
In response to Reply #15
|
These are all good ideas. The mid 30 to low 40 ranking as a shifter is bland af. And with Umi being such an analyst he can use the 2nd tier swaps as a basis for what people perceive as weak forms and maybe get some more balance happening to T2.
|
|
|
|
  |
Doof | Sun 26-Jun-16 08:54 AM |
Member since 03rd Dec 2009
200 posts
| |
|
#63990, "I would rather see "mixed" forms as a master-quest styl..."
In response to Reply #7
|
You know you want a rhino-gator or a falco-walrus.
|
|
|
|
    |
Jormyr | Sun 26-Jun-16 10:08 AM |
Member since 31st Dec 2014
423 posts
| |
|
#63991, "RE: I would rather see "
In response to Reply #17
|
>You know you want a rhino-gator or a falco-walrus.
Yeah, it SOUNDS cool until you end up with a rhino's backside stuck atop stubby alligator legs, or wings & beak on a walrus' bulk w/ no tusks.
|
|
|
|
      |
Doof | Tue 28-Jun-16 09:39 AM |
Member since 03rd Dec 2009
200 posts
| |
|
#63996, "Hey, it's a gamble. Sometimes it pays off. :) ..."
In response to Reply #18
|
|
|
      |
Murphy | Tue 28-Jun-16 10:39 AM |
Member since 30th Dec 2010
1639 posts
| |
|
#63997, "...reverse centaurs..."
In response to Reply #18
|
|
|
        |
laxman | Tue 28-Jun-16 11:18 AM |
Member since 18th Aug 2003
1867 posts
| |
|
#63998, "so... Basically British. Nt "
In response to Reply #21
|
|
|
          |
Kstatida | Tue 28-Jun-16 02:23 PM |
Member since 12th Feb 2015
2214 posts
| |
|
#63999, "Bwahahahaha"
In response to Reply #22
|
Sorry guys
|
|
|
|
    |
lurker | Sun 26-Jun-16 12:31 PM |
Member since 13th Mar 2006
249 posts
| |
|
#63992, "My dream was always offense and water to have a half sh..."
In response to Reply #17
|
|
|
    |
TMNS | Tue 28-Jun-16 08:11 PM |
Member since 10th Jun 2009
2670 posts
| |
|
#64000, "I just want Laser Cats. NT"
In response to Reply #17
|
|
|
      |
Saagkri | Sat 09-Jul-16 09:40 PM |
Member since 17th Jun 2014
801 posts
| |
|
#64030, "A groupmate could wield you as a weapon! NT"
In response to Reply #24
|
|
|
  |
SideStrider | Wed 29-Jun-16 11:15 AM |
Member since 30th Dec 2007
208 posts
| |
|
#64004, "RE: As a habitual shapeshifter player:"
In response to Reply #7
Edited on Wed 29-Jun-16 11:21 AM
|
Honestly I don't see the problem with shapeshifters as they are. I too nearly habitually play a shapeshifter. Allowing any type of quest that would allow people to change their forms to a guaranteed form would be a complete waste of time and it would then end with 85% of shapeshifters running around with the same form. Setting said quest with requirements like TM suggested is also a bad idea as stuff like that brings the douche out in most people.
If anything a few new additional final tier forms in each foci would be a breath of fresh air, but that is a quite a bit of work I know.
And Yes I agree, the elemental of surprise is the best part of playing a shapeshifter. Unless I end up with a lemur or something absolutely distasteful to my play style I generally don't roll or spin my forms.
*Editted to clarify that changing to a guaranteed roll would be a bad idea.
|
|
|
|
|
Kstatida | Wed 22-Jun-16 07:28 AM |
Member since 12th Feb 2015
2214 posts
| |
|
#63926, "Sorry"
In response to Reply #0
|
Removing random factor from shifters is against the class design.
Edit: Oops, wanted to post this under my Umiron account.
|
|
|
|
  |
Murphy | Wed 22-Jun-16 07:30 AM |
Member since 30th Dec 2010
1639 posts
| |
|
#63927, "Would still be random, and"
In response to Reply #1
|
...could always balance it in other ways. Perhaps you only get one focus.
|
|
|
|
    |
Kstatida | Wed 22-Jun-16 07:32 AM |
Member since 12th Feb 2015
2214 posts
| |
|
#63928, "RE: Would still be random, and"
In response to Reply #2
|
How would offense+ape be random for major form?
|
|
|
|
      |
Murphy | Wed 22-Jun-16 08:16 AM |
Member since 30th Dec 2010
1639 posts
| |
|
#63929, "No mixing with offense etc."
In response to Reply #3
|
And there are at least three top tier primate forms (gorilla, orangutan, howler monkey).
If less than three exist for some form families, yeah, it'd take some work to create some new ones to spice it up, or just exclude that form family from being a choosable option.
|
|
|
|
        |
Kstatida | Wed 22-Jun-16 08:40 AM |
Member since 12th Feb 2015
2214 posts
| |
|
#63930, "Major revamp of forms for the sake of role flavour"
In response to Reply #4
|
|
|
          |
Murphy | Wed 22-Jun-16 08:51 PM |
Member since 30th Dec 2010
1639 posts
| |
|
#63937, "Major revamp is something else."
In response to Reply #5
|
I'm not implying creating all those new forms THEN implementing animal foci. Can implement them for those form families that "fit".
It would be nice to expand some form families as well, but it would not be mandatory for the basic implementation of the feature I'm suggesting.
|
|
|
|
        |
lasentia | Wed 22-Jun-16 09:26 AM |
Member since 27th Apr 2010
987 posts
| |
|
#63931, "So foci doesn't matter?"
In response to Reply #4
Edited on Wed 22-Jun-16 09:27 AM
|
So I could get a 4th tier offense and a 3rd tier defense if I take bear forms? (Like I get polar bear and grizzly?)
And do I still get to pick two foci to have the same amount of forms? So can I go offense/animal, so I get general offense forms + forms of the animal?
I take reptile every time (assuming it excludes snakes) Croc/gator/komodo at final form.
or cat tiger/lion/cheetah/jag/wildcat.
massive mammal rhino/pachy/walrus
Only problem I see is it excludes most air/water forms, which does make sense.
I have no idea what forms go where for shifters FYI, so a lot of my info in examples is probably wrong.
|
|
|
|
  |
NoobAgain | Wed 22-Jun-16 08:35 PM |
Member since 01st Mar 2007
411 posts
| |
|
#63934, "Meh"
In response to Reply #1
|
It's against class design when leveling is trivial. It's not against class design when leveling to hero is actually a challenge due to low player numbers. We should accept the "new normal" and adjust, so this discussion is fully valid.
|
|
|
|
    |
Kstatida | Thu 23-Jun-16 03:16 AM |
Member since 12th Feb 2015
2214 posts
| |
|
#63946, "RE: Meh"
In response to Reply #8
|
Right, the only problem is that point of suggestion is RP, not ranking.
|
|
|
|
|