Subject: "reanimate and spellbane" Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #62399
Show all folders

SarienFri 22-Jan-16 08:05 AM
Member since 14th Feb 2009
740 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#62399, "reanimate and spellbane"


          

Should reanimate seemingly bypass spellbane? I can't think of any other targeted spells that get a free pass.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Reply I'd say so, incognito, 22-Jan-16 01:08 PM, #13
Reply isn't that an area spell? nt, Dallevian, 22-Jan-16 01:40 PM, #16
     Reply Yes but other area spells, incognito, 22-Jan-16 03:00 PM, #19
Reply Makes sense to me. (nt), Umiron, 22-Jan-16 09:06 AM, #1
     Reply Clarification?, Sarien, 22-Jan-16 09:51 AM, #2
          Reply I agree, Bemused, 22-Jan-16 09:52 AM, #3
          Reply I am fine with it either way - I just want consistency ..., Sarien, 22-Jan-16 10:00 AM, #4
          Reply Easily, Kstatida, 22-Jan-16 10:06 AM, #6
          Reply You misspelled Sciontific., Murphy, 22-Jan-16 10:09 AM, #8
          Reply Let's make seaweed off limits to ragers, incognito, 22-Jan-16 01:10 PM, #14
               Reply got to be balanced for non lich/mummy as well, laxman, 22-Jan-16 01:58 PM, #17
                    Reply This is true..., Tac, 22-Jan-16 02:07 PM, #18
                    Reply They only have to land sleep though, incognito, 22-Jan-16 03:03 PM, #21
          Reply you serious? as a rager with -65svs, reanimate tore th..., Dallevian, 22-Jan-16 10:00 AM, #5
               Reply If you took that much damage..., laxman, 22-Jan-16 11:55 AM, #10
                    Reply yes, sigil, first thing lich and mummy always open with, Dallevian, 22-Jan-16 12:11 PM, #11
                         Reply I've hit unspeaks with the spell, incognito, 22-Jan-16 03:01 PM, #20
          Reply RE: Clarification?, Umiron, 22-Jan-16 10:07 AM, #7
          Reply CF is like the Bible! nt, Tac, 22-Jan-16 10:19 AM, #9
          Reply Correct me if I'm wrong but before this post it DID byp..., TJHuron, 22-Jan-16 12:59 PM, #12
               Reply Yes. I changed nothing. (nt), Umiron, 22-Jan-16 01:14 PM, #15
          Reply RE: Consistency, Jormyr, 22-Jan-16 10:11 PM, #22
               Reply RE: Consistency, Jaegendar, 22-Jan-16 11:00 PM, #23
               Reply RE: Consistency, Sarien, 23-Jan-16 10:58 AM, #24

incognitoFri 22-Jan-16 01:08 PM
Member since 04th Mar 2003
4495 posts
Click to add this author to your buddy list
#62414, "I'd say so"
In response to Reply #0


          

Same as corpse thrall can bypass spellbane on a thirsting rager.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
DallevianFri 22-Jan-16 01:40 PM
Member since 04th Mar 2003
1639 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#62417, "isn't that an area spell? nt"
In response to Reply #13


          

nt

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
incognitoFri 22-Jan-16 03:00 PM
Member since 04th Mar 2003
4495 posts
Click to add this author to your buddy list
#62420, "Yes but other area spells"
In response to Reply #16


          

Can be baned when thirsting.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

UmironFri 22-Jan-16 09:06 AM
Member since 29th May 2017
1497 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list
#62400, "Makes sense to me. (nt)"
In response to Reply #0


          

nt

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
SarienFri 22-Jan-16 09:50 AM
Member since 14th Feb 2009
740 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#62401, "Clarification?"
In response to Reply #1
Edited on Fri 22-Jan-16 09:51 AM

          

Do you mean that it makes sense that re-animate bypasses spellbane because it is a physical altered body part being thrown at the target?

Or:

Do you mean it makes sense that it should not bypass spellbane as it is a targeted spell.

If you meant along the lines of the first, then it would stand to reason that things like

pebble to boulder
ice shards
icicle

and other spells that manifest physical attacks should bypass as well.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
BemusedFri 22-Jan-16 09:52 AM
Member since 15th Oct 2013
665 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#62402, "I agree"
In response to Reply #2


          

More spells should bypass spellbane.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
SarienFri 22-Jan-16 10:00 AM
Member since 14th Feb 2009
740 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#62403, "I am fine with it either way - I just want consistency ..."
In response to Reply #3
Edited on Fri 22-Jan-16 10:00 AM

          

It makes "somewhat" sense to me that spells that manifest in a physical nature e.g. I can see how you can't "spellbane" a string of intestines that then strangles you

by the same logic, you shouldn't be able to "spellbane" a boulder flying at you.

Wheras "Spells" that actually affect the rager (muter spells/immolate things of actual magic nature hitting the rager) should obviously be spellbaned.

From a balance perspective it makes more sense that 'targeted' spells are able to be spellbaned.

I am fine with either - I just would like consistency.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
KstatidaFri 22-Jan-16 10:06 AM
Member since 12th Feb 2015
2214 posts
Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list
#62406, "Easily"
In response to Reply #4


          

Spellbane is like "anti-magic" sphere.

Incestines should actually "strangle" a rager actively, not just hit him with sheer kinetic force. By getting into the anti-magic sphere, they are no longer animated.

Same goes for ice needles, pebble to boulder and others. If the attack itself is magical (created by magic) - it gets nullified.

If reanimate hurled a skull at 100 km/h, that would be another matter, you'd just get mV^2/2 scientific damage no matter the anti-magic sphere you have.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                    
MurphyFri 22-Jan-16 10:09 AM
Member since 30th Dec 2010
1639 posts
Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#62408, "You misspelled Sciontific."
In response to Reply #6


          

nt

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
incognitoFri 22-Jan-16 01:10 PM
Member since 04th Mar 2003
4495 posts
Click to add this author to your buddy list
#62415, "Let's make seaweed off limits to ragers"
In response to Reply #4


          

For consistency.

Consistency is overrated at times.

I like that some spells can't be spellbaned.

I don't, however, like that embalmed things can be animated at full strength. I'd rather see only fresh things have full strength.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                    
laxmanFri 22-Jan-16 01:58 PM
Member since 18th Aug 2003
1867 posts
Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to send message via AOL IM
#62418, "got to be balanced for non lich/mummy as well"
In response to Reply #14


          

With spellbane and decent saves a necro is going to only get 1/4 spells through bane unless they constantly thin the veil. A villager has a really solid shot against even undead as long as they don't panic or get slept.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                        
TacFri 22-Jan-16 02:07 PM
Member since 15th Nov 2005
2050 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#62419, "This is true..."
In response to Reply #17


          


>A villager has a really solid shot against even undead as long
>as they don't panic or get slept.

But maybe the fundamental issue is that Lich (and AP to a similar extent) have power based around never dying, and that's harder to balance. You want to make sure they can have fun, while also making it fun for others, which is tough since one side basically can never lose without a giant loss of power than can vary between difficult to impossible to get again.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                        
incognitoFri 22-Jan-16 03:03 PM
Member since 04th Mar 2003
4495 posts
Click to add this author to your buddy list
#62422, "They only have to land sleep though"
In response to Reply #17


          

And nearly every villager will die, since not only do they fail to bane when sleeping, their resist may will drop along with spellbane while asleep.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
DallevianFri 22-Jan-16 10:00 AM
Member since 04th Mar 2003
1639 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#62405, "you serious? as a rager with -65svs, reanimate tore th..."
In response to Reply #3


          

1 round lag
obliterate damage through rager resist, even had a few annihilates

the spell either needs a more normal damage cap or be changed to 2round lag.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
laxmanFri 22-Jan-16 11:55 AM
Member since 18th Aug 2003
1867 posts
Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to send message via AOL IM
#62411, "If you took that much damage..."
In response to Reply #5


          

One or more of the following things was happening

1.) you failed your saving throw (cuts damage in half)
2.) the body part hit a vuln (they can do blunt and mental damage depending on the part)
3.) you were affected by a digit of pain (somewhere between 20-30% damage boost)

Reanimate is a pain to use, embalmed body parts don't last that long without the master embalmer edge and take up inventory space. And with saves and resist you can reduce the damage to mangles, when its that low it shouldn't be a threat to you.




>1 round lag
>obliterate damage through rager resist, even had a few
>annihilates
>
>the spell either needs a more normal damage cap or be changed
>to 2round lag.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                    
DallevianFri 22-Jan-16 12:11 PM
Member since 04th Mar 2003
1639 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#62412, "yes, sigil, first thing lich and mummy always open with"
In response to Reply #10


          

and yes, i've seen the vuln hit for an unspeakable once, not on me though.

reanimate isn't a pain to use, it's very easy to gather a handful before a raid.

not my first rodeo.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                        
incognitoFri 22-Jan-16 03:01 PM
Member since 04th Mar 2003
4495 posts
Click to add this author to your buddy list
#62421, "I've hit unspeaks with the spell"
In response to Reply #11


          

Without prior maladiction or hitting a vuln.

Also in the log where the mummy fights the Maran there are a series of unspeaks without apparent prior maladiction.

Iirc it was only heads, hands and guts that do that high damage?

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
UmironFri 22-Jan-16 10:07 AM
Member since 29th May 2017
1497 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list
#62407, "RE: Clarification?"
In response to Reply #2


          

I'm fine with spellbane working against projectiles that are manifested by their spells (e.g., an icicle that wasn't there until someone casted a magic). Some of the specific echoes that reanimate uses probably don't fall strictly outside that description, but again, I'm fine with it.

If you demand perfect consistency then CF probably isn't the game for you. It's been designed and built over the course of almost 22 years by dozens of people with no real plans or underlying spec. Consistency is good and I think we do a pretty good job of making things intuitive (based on what similar abilities do, for example), but you'll go mad or bored if you comb through CF looking for inconsistencies in skills, lore, zones, etc., so I don't.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
TacFri 22-Jan-16 10:19 AM
Member since 15th Nov 2005
2050 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#62409, "CF is like the Bible! nt"
In response to Reply #7


          

.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
TJHuronFri 22-Jan-16 12:59 PM
Member since 28th Nov 2007
1132 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list
#62413, "Correct me if I'm wrong but before this post it DID byp..."
In response to Reply #7


          

nt

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
UmironFri 22-Jan-16 01:14 PM
Member since 29th May 2017
1497 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list
#62416, "Yes. I changed nothing. (nt)"
In response to Reply #12


          

nt

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
JormyrFri 22-Jan-16 10:11 PM
Member since 31st Dec 2014
422 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#62423, "RE: Consistency"
In response to Reply #2


          

Umiron and I were actually recently discussing the aspect of things like fireshield vs. a flaming sword. On one side, it might be a metal sword that's on fire, at which point you're taking no damage, even though you're being smacked in the face with 15lb of steel. Or, it might be a magical, purely flame sword, where fireshield makes sense you'd be immune. In a perfect world, we'd chop all the damage apart at apply each separately. Unfortunately, I didn't win the powerball and so wasn't able to convince Umiron to quit his job to dig into THAT mess.

If we really wanted to try to apply some logic to these, you could argue that the actual projectile in anything most invoker spells is purely magical. The boulder is ACTUALLY a pebble, and the rager's just shrugging of that pebble. Iceshards aren't some sciency freezing process, it's just summoning ice from a magical plane, and rager can ignore it. On the flip side, these reanimated parts actually exist, and barring magical dead things, are themselves nonmagical. The magic's just affecting the item itself. Just like a rager gets hit full force from an enchanted sword.

Off the top of my head, I believe I can think of at least one simple counter to this spell, though unfortunately the current undead people using it would be immune. Personally, I don't think the spell is out of line, just someone's using it particularly effectively, and both Battle and necromancers are some of my go-to characters. The only aspect I'd be particularly concerned with is being certain it does have some form of a save. Beyond that, I'm good with a crafty necromancer making use of their tools.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
JaegendarFri 22-Jan-16 11:00 PM
Member since 30th May 2014
136 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#62424, "RE: Consistency"
In response to Reply #22


          

Or you could be an assassin and take that deflect missile edge.
I wonder how effective it would be....

-Jaegendar

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
SarienSat 23-Jan-16 10:58 AM
Member since 14th Feb 2009
740 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#62425, "RE: Consistency"
In response to Reply #22


          

I didn't win the powerball either so I can't bribe him. My main issue is that spellbane can trigger on all targeted spells but this one. Which from a balance perspective doesn't make sense to me.

In your pebble to Boulder point you come to the conclusion that the rager is just shrugging off the pebble because it is magic that makes it a boulder. If you apply that same logic to reanimate then the rager would be shrugging off some wet rotting intestines that were thrown at him because without the magical manipulation they are just guts. Gross, but not that harmful .

For the sake of consistency it'd be nice if this spell were brought into line with all other targeted spells

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #62399 Previous topic | Next topic