|
ORB | Tue 19-Oct-04 07:17 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
993 posts
| |
|
#6145, "Outlander Bartering"
|
Outlanders need a way to barter for multiple items, make it a high lvl power or something. Please? That which does not kill us, makes us stronger.
|
|
|
|
RE: Outlander Bartering,
WildGirl,
23-Oct-04 05:16 PM, #4
RE: Outlander Bartering,
ORB,
24-Oct-04 11:07 AM, #5
Qaledus already answered this to my post as follows:,
Mordacai,
23-Oct-04 01:28 AM, #3
RE: Qaledus already answered this to my post as follows...,
ORB,
24-Oct-04 11:10 AM, #6
This might be a good incentive.,
Cerunnir,
19-Oct-04 11:38 PM, #2
Totally agreed and supported nt,
Narissa,
19-Oct-04 09:42 PM, #1
| |
|
WildGirl | Sat 23-Oct-04 05:16 PM |
Member since 16th Sep 2004
250 posts
| |
|
#6173, "RE: Outlander Bartering"
In response to Reply #0
|
As one who has played many Outlanders, I really don't find this to be any great deal. Granted, some Outlander characters need to barter more than others do, but the abstained use of coins is the way I prefer it. Even when I make a new character without the cabal in mind, I usually shun money for one reason or another. There are just too many ways around its need to actually be of any use. I've played warriors, and know there are warriors within the cabal, that get along just fine without the use of the all-important detect invis preps and such. Perhaps that was what the immortals had in mind, too. As it stands, being invisible is just about as useful as infravision is.
|
|
|
|
  |
ORB | Sun 24-Oct-04 11:07 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
993 posts
| |
|
#6174, "RE: Outlander Bartering"
In response to Reply #4
|
No offense but you're smoking the purple crack if you don't think warriors need detect invis, fly, enlarge, reduce, faerie fog, etc. Also from what you've wrote you've never played a class in Outlander that had to rely on these kind of preps. I can't count how many times a group of mass invis'd imperials have ganked suckers who couldn't see them. Invisablity might be as useful as infravision to the players who can see it, but if you can't see it it's the kiss of death. Ever wonder why Ragers were given the ability to detect invis even without the head? I'd also like to add, not matter what people/Imms say it's just retarded that you can only barter a 100,000 gold kings crown for one pie. That which does not kill us, makes us stronger.
|
|
|
|
|
Mordacai | Sat 23-Oct-04 01:28 AM |
Member since 10th Sep 2003
13 posts
| |
|
#6171, "Qaledus already answered this to my post as follows:"
In response to Reply #0
|
>Has anyone given much thought to allowing a player to barter >for several items with one single item that is worth the >multiple items?
It has been considered, but is so low priority that you're not likely to see it any time soon. Trading items one for one is simply how things are in Thera, and while in the real world you could trade a diamond ring for lots of things, in Thera that's just not the case.
Also, because that's the case, trading a diamond ring for something like a pie may seem like a stupid code limitation to you as the player, but to the character it is simply an exceptionally bad trade or one of desparation.
|
|
|
|
  |
ORB | Sun 24-Oct-04 11:10 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
993 posts
| |
|
#6175, "RE: Qaledus already answered this to my post as follows..."
In response to Reply #3
|
I'm saying up the priority because it is a huge pain in the ass of Outlanders. Especially certain classes that play it. I'm not sure if the Imms think this is a fun challenge for the cabal, I find it a time consuming annoyance and I gurantdamntee I'm not the only player who thinks so. That which does not kill us, makes us stronger.
|
|
|
|
|
Narissa | Tue 19-Oct-04 09:42 PM |
Member since 04th May 2003
279 posts
| |
|
#6148, "Totally agreed and supported nt"
In response to Reply #0
|
>Outlanders need a way to barter for multiple items, make it a >high lvl power or something. Please?
|
|
|
|
|