Why would you expect an answer?,
incognito,
04-Sep-14 07:18 AM, #1
Because its existence is common knowledge,
robdarken_,
04-Sep-14 08:28 AM, #2
Why,,
Tsunami,
04-Sep-14 08:59 AM, #3
RE: Why,,
Elerosse,
05-Sep-14 04:36 PM, #4
Right...,
Tsunami,
05-Sep-14 05:59 PM, #5
So you did!,
Elerosse,
05-Sep-14 10:20 PM, #6
Just...,
Tsunami,
05-Sep-14 10:28 PM, #7
| |
|
incognito | Thu 04-Sep-14 07:18 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
4495 posts
| |
|
#56570, "Why would you expect an answer?"
In response to Reply #0
|
When the helpfile says you have to work out the effects by experimentation?
If, having experimented, you can't tell the difference, then it probably isn't worth worrying about.
|
|
|
|
    |
Tsunami | Thu 04-Sep-14 08:59 AM |
Member since 25th Mar 2008
1509 posts
| |
|
#56574, "Why,"
In response to Reply #2
|
Would you do plague before plague malison if plague malison is supposed to make it easier to land plague? Plague malison is clearly something that makes plague worse if you already have it, in some fashion. Damage or otherwise.
|
|
|
|
      |
Elerosse | Fri 05-Sep-14 04:36 PM |
Member since 01st Nov 2006
423 posts
| |
|
#56596, "RE: Why,"
In response to Reply #3
Edited on Fri 05-Sep-14 04:36 PM
|
If it is purely a damage multiplier then it would make sense to plague first. If it decreases resistance to plague landing then you would cast it first.
|
|
|
|
        |
Tsunami | Fri 05-Sep-14 05:59 PM |
Member since 25th Mar 2008
1509 posts
| |
|
#56597, "Right..."
In response to Reply #4
|
That's what I said.
Read Daev's post. He would know what it does and he says Plague Malison comes after plague.
|
|
|
|
          |
Elerosse | Fri 05-Sep-14 10:20 PM |
Member since 01st Nov 2006
423 posts
| |
|
#56598, "So you did!"
In response to Reply #5
|
Miss read your post it would seem.
|
|
|
|
            |
Tsunami | Fri 05-Sep-14 10:28 PM |
Member since 25th Mar 2008
1509 posts
| |
|
#56599, "Just..."
In response to Reply #6
|
don't tell anyone. It will be our little secret.
|
|
|
|
|