|
|
#44388, "Disturbing players."
|
If I was a nuissance in a public venue like a ball park I would be removed. If I wasn't the proprietors of the place could expect to see a decline in patrons.
I'm curious as to why the staff here doesn't take a similar approach.
I;ve already encountered a certain someones character and pegged them for who they were, litterally the first sentence they sent to me.
My experience is already lessened by this to the point I do not want to rank because I know they will full loot and talk #### me if they kill me.
I'm predicting a long flaming thread when this character passes and, what is more, I'm sure there will come threads on Dio's about his prickishness because that's just who they are.
So why are these players allowed here?
|
|
|
|
Stuff it, Pro.~,
blackbird,
13-Mar-12 12:22 PM, #6
I was about to say that. nt,
dwimmerling,
13-Mar-12 11:52 PM, #12
Sounds like a serious problem,
Artificial,
13-Mar-12 03:46 AM, #1
That would not accomplish anything.,
That guy (Anonymous),
13-Mar-12 04:11 AM, #2
..this is the officials board. ,
Lhydia,
13-Mar-12 06:19 AM, #3
I'm speaking of players who are intentionally disruptiv...,
That guy again. (Anonymous),
13-Mar-12 07:52 AM, #4
Yeah but one mans detriment is another mans bliss,
Lhydia,
13-Mar-12 09:16 AM, #5
Isn't trolling a Bannable offense?,
Alston,
13-Mar-12 03:56 PM, #7
I don't view his reply as a troll.,
Twist,
13-Mar-12 04:04 PM, #8
I don't read that in his response at all.,
Alston,
14-Mar-12 01:40 AM, #14
Rereading it I guess that is what he meant. n/t,
Alston,
14-Mar-12 03:32 AM, #16
RE: Isn't trolling a Bannable offense?,
Zulghinlour,
13-Mar-12 04:15 PM, #9
The reason was.,
Alston,
14-Mar-12 01:43 AM, #13
Anonymity ,
Homard,
14-Mar-12 01:48 AM, #15
You're not anonymous if you give yourself away just by ...,
robdarken_,
14-Mar-12 11:26 PM, #17
Fallacy. Easy to spot to some...,
Alston,
15-Mar-12 04:31 AM, #18
You are a communist.,
Graatch,
15-Mar-12 10:35 AM, #19
Tsk tsk. And here I always assumed you had integrity.,
Alston,
15-Mar-12 02:25 PM, #20
I don't typically troll on officials. n/t,
Lhydia,
13-Mar-12 07:04 PM, #10
You're a known liar. We can't trust you. NT,
TMNS,
13-Mar-12 07:42 PM, #11
| |
  |
dwimmerling | Tue 13-Mar-12 11:52 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
216 posts
|
|
|
#44426, "I was about to say that. nt"
In response to Reply #6
|
|
|
  |
|
#44390, "That would not accomplish anything."
In response to Reply #1
|
The behavior would continue and I feel I have as much a right to express my grievance over this person behavior as anyone.
What's more, not all classes are capable of doing what you suggest.
I would ask that the player is banned based upon their past and continued behavior. A thinly disguised veil of RP to justify their griefing isn't enough to allow it to continue.
I won't mention their name because they are banned here and on officials and thus can't defend themselves, but they need to go. This is of course my opinion.
I wish there was a system in place where we as players could report each other and not be lambasted for being upset when wronged or griefed by people like this.
|
|
|
|
      |
|
#44398, "I'm speaking of players who are intentionally disruptiv..."
In response to Reply #3
|
We know who they are and I think they should be banned, even if they haven't broken a rule persay. if they have been consistantly voted as having ####ty characters that have a negative impact, get rid of them. They are a detrement to the game.
|
|
|
|
          |
Alston | Tue 13-Mar-12 03:55 PM |
Member since 07th Sep 2011
858 posts
| |
|
#44416, "Isn't trolling a Bannable offense?"
In response to Reply #5
Edited on Tue 13-Mar-12 03:56 PM
|
This person is clearly trolling. Their reply isn't even in line with the complaint.
Get rid of this crap.
|
|
|
|
            |
Twist | Tue 13-Mar-12 04:04 PM |
Member since 23rd Sep 2006
3431 posts
| |
|
#44417, "I don't view his reply as a troll."
In response to Reply #7
|
He's saying that while you, personally, may have issues with the type of player you describe, he finds it enjoyable to kill the characters that exhibit the behavior you dislike. Perhaps more enjoyable than a normal PKwin.
The subsequent meltdown, while something most people roll their eyes at, is something that some people enjoy having caused, especially to a player like that.
To put it another way, if some jerkoff cuts you off on a busy freeway, only to get pulled over moments later, don't you feel a moment of quiet satisfaction? I know I do.
|
|
|
|
              |
Alston | Wed 14-Mar-12 01:40 AM |
Member since 07th Sep 2011
858 posts
| |
|
#44429, "I don't read that in his response at all."
In response to Reply #8
|
I read it as, he enjoys being the guy that causes ANYONE to melt down. In other words he is being antagonistic toward this post and thus trolling it.
What ever though.
|
|
|
|
                |
Alston | Wed 14-Mar-12 03:32 AM |
Member since 07th Sep 2011
858 posts
| |
|
#44432, "Rereading it I guess that is what he meant. n/t"
In response to Reply #14
|
|
|
            |
Zulghinlour | Tue 13-Mar-12 04:15 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
9792 posts
| |
|
#44418, "RE: Isn't trolling a Bannable offense?"
In response to Reply #7
|
>This person is clearly trolling. Their reply isn't even in >line with the complaint. > >Get rid of this crap.
If by "this crap" you mean this entire thread, then I agree with you. I also find it amusing that you try to hide behind anonymity by posting as "that guy" and still get pegged by other players.
Posts like this are not why we allow you to post anonymously. So long, and thanks for all the fish!
|
|
|
|
              |
Alston | Wed 14-Mar-12 01:38 AM |
Member since 07th Sep 2011
858 posts
| |
|
#44428, "The reason was."
In response to Reply #9
Edited on Wed 14-Mar-12 01:43 AM
|
Because I posted after an encounter with affore mentioned griefer and I did not want to be clear on the link between the characters.
Edit: Is it fair game to publicly guess at who it is behind an anonymous post now?
|
|
|
|
                |
Homard | Wed 14-Mar-12 01:48 AM |
Member since 10th Apr 2010
959 posts
| |
|
#44430, "Anonymity "
In response to Reply #13
|
Anonymous posting is so we can post with the handles of our active characters and not have to post cryptically in goodbyes or make five hundred different accounts.
It would be unacceptable to guess at who was posting under the handle "Satebos," but not who is complaining under the handle "Complainer."
Isn't this obvious?
|
|
|
|
                | |
                  |
Alston | Thu 15-Mar-12 04:31 AM |
Member since 07th Sep 2011
858 posts
| |
|
#44440, "Fallacy. Easy to spot to some..."
In response to Reply #17
|
Doesn't mean easy to spot to all. Nor does my identy change the fact that there are players who are in it to #### over other players and should be banned.
|
|
|
|
                    |
Graatch | Thu 15-Mar-12 10:35 AM |
Member since 14th Apr 2010
167 posts
| |
|
#44447, "You are a communist."
In response to Reply #18
|
>Doesn't mean easy to spot to all. Nor does my identy change >the fact that there are players who are in it to #### over >other players and should be banned.
You want to ban people for motive. Thought crime. Something you obviously cannot know, and is entirely subjective. You are from Soviet Russia!
If they break rules, they get banned. If they don't break rules, they don't get banned. Simple.
|
|
|
|
                      |
Alston | Thu 15-Mar-12 02:25 PM |
Member since 07th Sep 2011
858 posts
| |
|
#44449, "Tsk tsk. And here I always assumed you had integrity."
In response to Reply #19
|
I specificlly mentioned banning the players that have done nothing but cause grief.
That's not being thought police, it's being quality control.
You've lost your priviledges for being dishonest.
|
|
|
|
            |
Lhydia | Tue 13-Mar-12 07:04 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
2391 posts
| |
|
#44420, "I don't typically troll on officials. n/t"
In response to Reply #7
|
|
|
              |
TMNS | Tue 13-Mar-12 07:42 PM |
Member since 10th Jun 2009
2670 posts
| |
|
#44423, "You're a known liar. We can't trust you. NT"
In response to Reply #10
|
|
|
|