RE: question for team macalla,
coconut,
26-Aug-10 03:53 AM, #10
RE: question for team macalla,
Daevryn,
21-Aug-10 08:41 PM, #1
RE: question for team macalla,
Isildur,
21-Aug-10 09:34 PM, #2
He did, and that's the post where he said he..,
Pro,
22-Aug-10 03:20 AM, #3
RE: question for team macalla,
Daevryn,
22-Aug-10 09:13 AM, #4
RE: question for team macalla,
Isildur,
22-Aug-10 09:44 AM, #9
RE: question for team macalla,
Humbert,
22-Aug-10 02:26 PM, #5
It does not fire offense. n/t,
Pro,
22-Aug-10 05:19 PM, #7
RE: It does not fire offense. n/t,
Isildur,
22-Aug-10 06:29 PM, #8
Ad Nauseum on Fires.,
Pro,
22-Aug-10 05:18 PM, #6
| |
|
coconut | Thu 26-Aug-10 03:53 AM |
Member since 29th Jul 2010
65 posts
| |
|
#35055, "RE: question for team macalla"
In response to Reply #0
|
will you still get effect og whirlwind, if you have imperial training as a arial? i mean imperial offense
|
|
|
|
|
Daevryn | Sat 21-Aug-10 08:41 PM |
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
| |
|
#34928, "RE: question for team macalla"
In response to Reply #0
|
Sure: the main key to Whirlwind is your current dex vs. their current dex.
|
|
|
|
    |
Pro | Sun 22-Aug-10 03:20 AM |
Member since 14th Apr 2010
776 posts
| |
|
#34934, "He did, and that's the post where he said he.."
In response to Reply #2
|
He could get 11 attacks out of an arial. I can't locate it though. I have looked.
|
|
|
|
    |
Daevryn | Sun 22-Aug-10 09:13 AM |
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
| |
|
#34936, "RE: question for team macalla"
In response to Reply #2
|
Yes; however, what I said above is still correct and probably should still form the basis of whether or not you think whirlwind might be a good idea for a character.
|
|
|
|
        |
Humbert | Sun 22-Aug-10 02:26 PM |
Member since 13th Jun 2009
179 posts
| |
|
#34939, "RE: question for team macalla"
In response to Reply #9
|
I believe Fires boosts both defence and offence when you are low on health.
|
|
|
|
          |
Pro | Sun 22-Aug-10 05:19 PM |
Member since 14th Apr 2010
776 posts
| |
|
#34943, "It does not fire offense. n/t"
In response to Reply #5
|
|
|
            | |
        |
Pro | Sun 22-Aug-10 05:18 PM |
Member since 14th Apr 2010
776 posts
| |
|
#34942, "Ad Nauseum on Fires."
In response to Reply #9
|
This has been hashed and rehashed over and over.
It acts to increase parry and dodge, that is all, not damage or evasion.
|
|
|
|
|