  Leverage/balance issues.,
Valguarnera ,
08-Jan-04 09:08 PM, #1
RE: Leverage/balance issues.,
Narissa,
08-Jan-04 10:04 PM, #2
RE: Leverage/balance issues.,
Valguarnera,
09-Jan-04 12:54 AM, #3
RE: Leverage/balance issues.,
ORB,
09-Jan-04 03:14 AM, #4
RE: Leverage/balance issues.,
nepenthe,
09-Jan-04 09:08 AM, #5
 You remember correctly. (n/t),
Valguarnera,
09-Jan-04 01:18 PM, #6
RE: Leverage/balance issues.,
ORB,
09-Jan-04 08:13 PM, #7
Or spear specs.,
Valguarnera,
09-Jan-04 08:27 PM, #8
| |
| |
|
Narissa | Thu 08-Jan-04 10:04 PM |
Member since 04th May 2003
279 posts
|     |
|
#3435, "RE: Leverage/balance issues."
In response to Reply #1
|
What about lances? They do pierce through shields or even break them? Think polearms specs are highlighting that they don't have a maledict attack which can effectively cripple another.
'Nuff said.
|
|
|
|
| |
|
ORB | Fri 09-Jan-04 03:14 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
993 posts
| |
|
#3439, "RE: Leverage/balance issues."
In response to Reply #3
|
How about this though.
1. Give polearm specs a better charge from the avg joe warrior. Give them a chance to stun an opponent for two or three rounds when they charge.
2. I picture polearm specs as being good for battling multiple opponents. Add to this by adding arc chop. Arc chop let's the polearm spec hit anyone fighting him with a weakened chop.
I think both of these would spice up polearm nicely and add some new strategies, but not make them overpowered. That which does not kill us,
makes us stronger.
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Valguarnera | Fri 09-Jan-04 01:18 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
6904 posts
| |
|
#3445, "You remember correctly. (n/t)"
In response to Reply #5
|
|
|
| |
|
Valguarnera | Fri 09-Jan-04 08:27 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
6904 posts
| |
|
#3452, "Or spear specs."
In response to Reply #7
|
|
|
|
