|
Dervish | Thu 21-Jan-10 09:17 PM |
Member since 11th Oct 2003
617 posts
|
|
|
#30205, "Has Calming the Tempest been changed in the last year or two? nt"
|
|
|
No (n/t),
Daevryn,
21-Jan-10 11:03 PM, #1
Ok, now question about Trapping please,
Dervish,
22-Jan-10 01:30 AM, #2
RE: Ok, now question about Trapping please,
Daevryn,
22-Jan-10 01:46 AM, #3
If that is the case...,
Guilo,
22-Jan-10 12:57 PM, #4
RE: If that is the case...,
Daevryn,
22-Jan-10 01:26 PM, #5
Yeah I didn't word that too well.,
Guilo,
22-Jan-10 01:49 PM, #6
RE: Yeah I didn't word that too well.,
Daevryn,
22-Jan-10 02:31 PM, #11
Jives with my experience.,
TMNS_lazy (Guest),
22-Jan-10 10:40 PM, #18
Hunh. Don't you hate finding out after the fact?,
Straklaw,
23-Jan-10 03:57 PM, #22
Untamed Forest has a close reasonable fascimile.,
TMNS_lazy (Guest),
23-Jan-10 08:27 PM, #23
Chilling Embrace idea.,
Forsakenz (Guest),
22-Jan-10 01:55 PM, #7
Hmmmm,
Guilo,
22-Jan-10 02:11 PM, #8
Sounds like a big change to me,
Daurwyn2 (Guest),
22-Jan-10 05:07 PM, #17
RE: Chilling Embrace idea.,
Daevryn,
22-Jan-10 02:19 PM, #9
See below in case you mistook me. Thanks. nt,
Forsakenz (Guest),
22-Jan-10 02:50 PM, #13
I understood you. (n/t),
Daevryn,
22-Jan-10 02:58 PM, #14
2? 2?!?! sigh nt,
Forsakenz (Guest),
22-Jan-10 03:23 PM, #15
Maybe 3 or 4. Definitely not 8. (n/t),
Daevryn,
22-Jan-10 04:35 PM, #16
I think this needs explained better.,
_Magus_2 (Guest),
22-Jan-10 02:26 PM, #10
I mean,
Forsakenz (Guest),
22-Jan-10 02:49 PM, #12
It would make the legacy worthy instead of complete cra...,
Dervish,
23-Jan-10 07:06 AM, #19
It's reasonably popular as-is, FYI,
Daevryn,
23-Jan-10 07:48 AM, #20
That's my thought, as well.,
Splntrd,
23-Jan-10 09:04 AM, #21
| |
|
Daevryn | Thu 21-Jan-10 11:03 PM |
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
| |
|
#30209, "No (n/t)"
In response to Reply #0
|
|
|
    |
Daevryn | Fri 22-Jan-10 01:45 AM |
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
| |
|
#30213, "RE: Ok, now question about Trapping please"
In response to Reply #2
Edited on Fri 22-Jan-10 01:46 AM
|
This:
> it the weapon type does not matter and with any weapon >you need same certain weight?
Well, I'll qualify that. It's not an on or off thing, it's a non-linear sliding scale. At something like 10 pounds, the legacy does SOMEthing, but probably you should have picked something else.
|
|
|
|
        |
Daevryn | Fri 22-Jan-10 01:26 PM |
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
| |
|
#30231, "RE: If that is the case..."
In response to Reply #4
|
It's not an apples to apples comparison, since chilling is just damage and trapping also makes you harder to parry.
Are we talking, you're dual wielding weapons that are each over 30 pounds? Or what? Be more specific.
|
|
|
|
          | |
            |
Daevryn | Fri 22-Jan-10 02:31 PM |
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
| |
|
#30239, "RE: Yeah I didn't word that too well."
In response to Reply #6
|
If I had to guess for that scenario (which I do since I'm not looking up the math right now) I'd say somewhere in the 20-25 pound range.
The tricky thing, of course, is often there's one or more pretty good maces you want to use that don't weigh all that much.
Generally I think it's better for trapping to have one really heavy weapon and one lighter weapon, than two medium weight weapons; this is especially true if you're going to be using some spec moves that key off your primary mace, such as boneshatter or cranial. I haven't tried to crunch all the numbers on that either but I'm pretty sure that checks out.
|
|
|
|
              |
|
#30271, "Jives with my experience."
In response to Reply #11
|
|
|
                | |
                  |
|
#30299, "Untamed Forest has a close reasonable fascimile."
In response to Reply #22
|
But seriously. With the hefty battle axe from the Weald + spider axe, I would be hitting DEMO's pretty consistantly (no other gear).
|
|
|
|
          |
|
#30234, "Chilling Embrace idea."
In response to Reply #5
|
I may have already proposed this, who knows...
what if chilling was straight up +dam and completely ignored damage reduction?
That would make the legacy very, very neat.
|
|
|
|
            | |
              |
|
#30250, "Sounds like a big change to me"
In response to Reply #8
|
|
|
            |
Daevryn | Fri 22-Jan-10 02:19 PM |
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
| |
|
#30237, "RE: Chilling Embrace idea."
In response to Reply #7
|
In that case it would probably be like +2 dam.
I'm just saying.
|
|
|
|
              |
|
#30241, "See below in case you mistook me. Thanks. nt"
In response to Reply #9
|
|
|
                |
Daevryn | Fri 22-Jan-10 02:58 PM |
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
| |
|
#30243, "I understood you. (n/t)"
In response to Reply #13
|
|
|
                  |
|
#30244, "2? 2?!?! sigh nt"
In response to Reply #14
|
|
|
                    |
Daevryn | Fri 22-Jan-10 04:35 PM |
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
| |
|
#30246, "Maybe 3 or 4. Definitely not 8. (n/t)"
In response to Reply #15
|
|
|
            |
|
#30238, "I think this needs explained better."
In response to Reply #7
|
What do you mean, completely ignore damage reduction?
|
|
|
|
              |
|
#30240, "I mean"
In response to Reply #10
|
that only the +8 dam bypasses dam reduction.
For simplicity sake, let's say I hit for 100 damage each hit. You have damage reduction of 50% so I now hit for 50 dam. As is, if I take chilling my 100 is now 108 and my final output in this scenario is 54 dam. I'd like for chilling to be tacked on at the end of that so I do 100 dam, halved by 50% to output 50 dam due to opponent dam redux, and then chilling is applied for an output of 58.
This would be very useful for fighting things like liches and abs'd invokers. Even if you had 100% dam redux (I know, impossible), chilling would give me 8 dam output regardless.
Does that make sense?
|
|
|
|
                |
Dervish | Sat 23-Jan-10 07:06 AM |
Member since 11th Oct 2003
617 posts
|
|
|
#30283, "It would make the legacy worthy instead of complete cra..."
In response to Reply #12
|
|
|
                  |
Daevryn | Sat 23-Jan-10 07:48 AM |
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
| |
|
#30284, "It's reasonably popular as-is, FYI"
In response to Reply #19
|
It's boring, but damage is pretty much always useful.
|
|
|
|
                    |
Splntrd | Sat 23-Jan-10 09:04 AM |
Member since 08th Feb 2004
1096 posts
| |
|
#30286, "That's my thought, as well."
In response to Reply #20
|
+8 Dam is 8 dam I don't have to gear for, freeing up slots I can then use for something I need more, like saves or hp.
It's just plain good utility. Splntrd
|
|
|
|
|