Subject: "Has Calming the Tempest been changed in the last year o..." Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #30205
Show all folders

DervishThu 21-Jan-10 09:17 PM
Member since 11th Oct 2003
617 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to send message via ICQ
#30205, "Has Calming the Tempest been changed in the last year or two? nt"


          

nt

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Reply No (n/t), Daevryn, 21-Jan-10 11:03 PM, #1
     Reply Ok, now question about Trapping please, Dervish, 22-Jan-10 01:30 AM, #2
          Reply RE: Ok, now question about Trapping please, Daevryn, 22-Jan-10 01:46 AM, #3
               Reply If that is the case..., Guilo, 22-Jan-10 12:57 PM, #4
                    Reply RE: If that is the case..., Daevryn, 22-Jan-10 01:26 PM, #5
                         Reply Yeah I didn't word that too well., Guilo, 22-Jan-10 01:49 PM, #6
                         Reply RE: Yeah I didn't word that too well., Daevryn, 22-Jan-10 02:31 PM, #11
                              Reply Jives with my experience., TMNS_lazy (Guest), 22-Jan-10 10:40 PM, #18
                                   Reply Hunh. Don't you hate finding out after the fact?, Straklaw, 23-Jan-10 03:57 PM, #22
                                        Reply Untamed Forest has a close reasonable fascimile., TMNS_lazy (Guest), 23-Jan-10 08:27 PM, #23
                         Reply Chilling Embrace idea., Forsakenz (Guest), 22-Jan-10 01:55 PM, #7
                              Reply Hmmmm, Guilo, 22-Jan-10 02:11 PM, #8
                              Reply Sounds like a big change to me, Daurwyn2 (Guest), 22-Jan-10 05:07 PM, #17
                              Reply RE: Chilling Embrace idea., Daevryn, 22-Jan-10 02:19 PM, #9
                              Reply See below in case you mistook me. Thanks. nt, Forsakenz (Guest), 22-Jan-10 02:50 PM, #13
                                   Reply I understood you. (n/t), Daevryn, 22-Jan-10 02:58 PM, #14
                                        Reply 2? 2?!?! sigh nt, Forsakenz (Guest), 22-Jan-10 03:23 PM, #15
                                             Reply Maybe 3 or 4. Definitely not 8. (n/t), Daevryn, 22-Jan-10 04:35 PM, #16
                              Reply I think this needs explained better., _Magus_2 (Guest), 22-Jan-10 02:26 PM, #10
                                   Reply I mean, Forsakenz (Guest), 22-Jan-10 02:49 PM, #12
                                        Reply It would make the legacy worthy instead of complete cra..., Dervish, 23-Jan-10 07:06 AM, #19
                                             Reply It's reasonably popular as-is, FYI, Daevryn, 23-Jan-10 07:48 AM, #20
                                                  Reply That's my thought, as well., Splntrd, 23-Jan-10 09:04 AM, #21

DaevrynThu 21-Jan-10 11:03 PM
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#30209, "No (n/t)"
In response to Reply #0


          

.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
DervishFri 22-Jan-10 01:30 AM
Member since 11th Oct 2003
617 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to send message via ICQ
#30212, "Ok, now question about Trapping please"
In response to Reply #1


          

Does it depends from weapon type, so to 'activate' it and notice damage difference with axes you have to wield 35lb axe, but with daggers 10lb is enough and with swords - 20 lb? Is it so, or it the weapon type does not matter and with any weapon you need same certain weight?

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
DaevrynFri 22-Jan-10 01:45 AM
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#30213, "RE: Ok, now question about Trapping please"
In response to Reply #2
Edited on Fri 22-Jan-10 01:46 AM

          

This:

> it the weapon type does not matter and with any weapon
>you need same certain weight?

Well, I'll qualify that. It's not an on or off thing, it's a non-linear sliding scale. At something like 10 pounds, the legacy does SOMEthing, but probably you should have picked something else.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
GuiloFri 22-Jan-10 12:57 PM
Member since 09th May 2008
367 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to send message via AOL IM
#30230, "If that is the case..."
In response to Reply #3


          

SOMETHING.. must mean at least a marginal effect, let's say two damroll for only 10 pounds?

Considering Chilling is only +8 now... would trapping almost always trump that extra damage if you have a spec that uses 30+lb weapons?

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
DaevrynFri 22-Jan-10 01:26 PM
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#30231, "RE: If that is the case..."
In response to Reply #4


          

It's not an apples to apples comparison, since chilling is just damage and trapping also makes you harder to parry.

Are we talking, you're dual wielding weapons that are each over 30 pounds? Or what? Be more specific.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                    
GuiloFri 22-Jan-10 01:48 PM
Member since 09th May 2008
367 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to send message via AOL IM
#30232, "Yeah I didn't word that too well."
In response to Reply #5
Edited on Fri 22-Jan-10 01:49 PM

          

I'm mainly wondering where the borderline lies between Chilling and Trapping as far as pure damage goes, bringing the "harder to parry" into consideration.

I think with as good as you are with numbers, commenting on a situation would give the best answer.

Let's say a warrior is at level 44.
40 dam suit, 25 hit and he's getting ready to fight an outer.
Let's use maces as the example since there's no riposte type auto attacks.
He is only using normal combat round damage to kill it.
Chilling will kill the outer faster than trapping with two 10 pound maces.

Granted the RNG I think plays maybe too large of a factor to accurately give a exact poundage, but as far as 100 attempts and taking a median guess... how much would the maces need to weigh before it proved more damage than chilling? And we are just assuming both maces are identical and weigh the same amount

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                        
DaevrynFri 22-Jan-10 02:31 PM
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#30239, "RE: Yeah I didn't word that too well."
In response to Reply #6


          

If I had to guess for that scenario (which I do since I'm not looking up the math right now) I'd say somewhere in the 20-25 pound range.

The tricky thing, of course, is often there's one or more pretty good maces you want to use that don't weigh all that much.

Generally I think it's better for trapping to have one really heavy weapon and one lighter weapon, than two medium weight weapons; this is especially true if you're going to be using some spec moves that key off your primary mace, such as boneshatter or cranial. I haven't tried to crunch all the numbers on that either but I'm pretty sure that checks out.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                            
TMNS_lazy (Guest)Fri 22-Jan-10 10:40 PM

  
#30271, "Jives with my experience."
In response to Reply #11


          

Mmmmmm. Conquest.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                
StraklawSat 23-Jan-10 03:57 PM
Member since 10th Mar 2003
1014 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to send message via AOL IM
#30293, "Hunh. Don't you hate finding out after the fact?"
In response to Reply #18


          

I almost always ended up going with two of the exact same weapons, so same weight, usually around the 20-30 range. Of course, w/ a fire giant, you can at least get decent mileage out of that still. How I miss wicked battleaxes. Le sigh.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                    
TMNS_lazy (Guest)Sat 23-Jan-10 08:27 PM

  
#30299, "Untamed Forest has a close reasonable fascimile."
In response to Reply #22


          

But seriously. With the hefty battle axe from the Weald + spider axe, I would be hitting DEMO's pretty consistantly (no other gear).

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                    
Forsakenz (Guest)Fri 22-Jan-10 01:55 PM

  
#30234, "Chilling Embrace idea."
In response to Reply #5


          

I may have already proposed this, who knows...

what if chilling was straight up +dam and completely ignored damage reduction?

That would make the legacy very, very neat.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                        
GuiloFri 22-Jan-10 02:11 PM
Member since 09th May 2008
367 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to send message via AOL IM
#30235, "Hmmmm"
In response to Reply #7


          

It sounds like you only mean the +dam that comes from chilling to ignore damage reduction? It almost seems as that would be such a small change it wouldn't even be worth doing.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                            
Daurwyn2 (Guest)Fri 22-Jan-10 05:07 PM

  
#30250, "Sounds like a big change to me"
In response to Reply #8


          

Not small at all.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                        
DaevrynFri 22-Jan-10 02:19 PM
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#30237, "RE: Chilling Embrace idea."
In response to Reply #7


          

In that case it would probably be like +2 dam.

I'm just saying.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                            
Forsakenz (Guest)Fri 22-Jan-10 02:50 PM

  
#30241, "See below in case you mistook me. Thanks. nt"
In response to Reply #9


          

nt

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                
DaevrynFri 22-Jan-10 02:58 PM
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#30243, "I understood you. (n/t)"
In response to Reply #13


          

.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                    
Forsakenz (Guest)Fri 22-Jan-10 03:23 PM

  
#30244, "2? 2?!?! sigh nt"
In response to Reply #14


          

nt

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                        
DaevrynFri 22-Jan-10 04:35 PM
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#30246, "Maybe 3 or 4. Definitely not 8. (n/t)"
In response to Reply #15


          

.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                        
_Magus_2 (Guest)Fri 22-Jan-10 02:26 PM

  
#30238, "I think this needs explained better."
In response to Reply #7


          

What do you mean, completely ignore damage reduction?

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                            
Forsakenz (Guest)Fri 22-Jan-10 02:49 PM

  
#30240, "I mean"
In response to Reply #10


          

that only the +8 dam bypasses dam reduction.

For simplicity sake, let's say I hit for 100 damage each hit. You have damage reduction of 50% so I now hit for 50 dam. As is, if I take chilling my 100 is now 108 and my final output in this scenario is 54 dam. I'd like for chilling to be tacked on at the end of that so I do 100 dam, halved by 50% to output 50 dam due to opponent dam redux, and then chilling is applied for an output of 58.

This would be very useful for fighting things like liches and abs'd invokers. Even if you had 100% dam redux (I know, impossible), chilling would give me 8 dam output regardless.

Does that make sense?

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                
DervishSat 23-Jan-10 07:06 AM
Member since 11th Oct 2003
617 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to send message via ICQ
#30283, "It would make the legacy worthy instead of complete cra..."
In response to Reply #12


          

nt

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                    
DaevrynSat 23-Jan-10 07:48 AM
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#30284, "It's reasonably popular as-is, FYI"
In response to Reply #19


          

It's boring, but damage is pretty much always useful.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                        
SplntrdSat 23-Jan-10 09:04 AM
Member since 08th Feb 2004
1096 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list
#30286, "That's my thought, as well."
In response to Reply #20


          

+8 Dam is 8 dam I don't have to gear for, freeing up slots I can then use for something I need more, like saves or hp.

It's just plain good utility.

Splntrd

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #30205 Previous topic | Next topic