  Well...,
Zulghinlour,
14-Nov-09 02:51 AM, #5
RE: feature to make zulg's life easier,
Splntrd,
14-Nov-09 02:33 AM, #3
  Uhm....,
Zulghinlour,
14-Nov-09 02:49 AM, #4
RE: Uhm....,
Splntrd,
14-Nov-09 04:15 AM, #6
RE: Uhm....,
Grobbak,
14-Nov-09 10:12 AM, #7
RE: Uhm....,
Daevryn,
14-Nov-09 12:45 PM, #8
I second this idea -NT-,
WarMage,
13-Nov-09 04:15 PM, #1
I suggest automated beer delivery for Zulg. (N/T),
Straklaw,
13-Nov-09 04:33 PM, #2
| |
|
|
Zulghinlour | Sat 14-Nov-09 02:51 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
9792 posts
|     |
|
#27659, "Well..."
In response to Reply #0
|
>Possible to automate PBF posting based on character
>destruction?
>
>Basically allow someone to "pre-pay" for their character's
>PBF. Then, when that character dies/deletes it automagically
>gets posted along w/ the normal death_angel post on the
>Battlefield.
>
>Or are PBFs something that must necessarily be done manually?
I could probably wire up something that would allow you to pay while a character is still alive and publish on death, however setting that bit on the character would still have to be done manually. Ultimately, we have to make sure that the payment through paypal clears, and that part is manual. So long, and thanks for all the fish!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Splntrd | Sat 14-Nov-09 02:33 AM |
Member since 08th Feb 2004
1096 posts
| |
|
#27657, "RE: feature to make zulg's life easier"
In response to Reply #0
|
Screening roles and immortal comments for sensitive information is something that must be done manually. Splntrd
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Zulghinlour | Sat 14-Nov-09 02:49 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
9792 posts
| |
|
#27658, "Uhm...."
In response to Reply #3
|
>Screening roles and immortal comments for sensitive
>information is something that must be done manually.
This rarely (if ever) actually happens. Especially for Immortal comments. So long, and thanks for all the fish!
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Splntrd | Sat 14-Nov-09 04:15 AM |
Member since 08th Feb 2004
1096 posts
| |
|
#28319, "RE: Uhm...."
In response to Reply #4
|
If it was automated the way he suggested, you wouldn't be able to do that (before it went public) at all, if you wanted to (for any reason). Splntrd
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Grobbak | Sat 14-Nov-09 10:12 AM |
Member since 13th Jul 2009
174 posts
| |
|
#28329, "RE: Uhm...."
In response to Reply #6
|
I think Z's point is that the things that we as IMM's put in as comments almost never need to be screened. Least not enough that it would impede any kind of autoondeathPBFposting.
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Daevryn | Sat 14-Nov-09 12:45 PM |
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
| |
|
#28333, "RE: Uhm...."
In response to Reply #6
|
I honestly can't remember having ever done it.
There are some things that aren't meant for public consumption (cheating, etc.) and those things ahead of time go someplace you won't see.
|
|
|
|
|
|
WarMage | Fri 13-Nov-09 04:15 PM |
Member since 03rd Oct 2007
93 posts
| |
|
#27655, "I second this idea -NT-"
In response to Reply #0
Edited on Fri 13-Nov-09 04:15 PM
|
NT News flash, everybody on this ####ing MUD wants to be Rambo. We should have called it RamboMUD. ~Daevryn~
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Straklaw | Fri 13-Nov-09 04:33 PM |
Member since 10th Mar 2003
1014 posts
|  |
|
#27656, "I suggest automated beer delivery for Zulg. (N/T)"
In response to Reply #1
|
|
|
|
