|
Abernyte | Mon 05-May-08 05:26 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
975 posts
| |
|
#21309, "Idea about emperor powers."
|
No other cabal leader gets all the other skills within their cabal so why does the Emperor?
What I thought was that if the Empire is low on numbers the Emperor should be a rally point and having all those pimp abilities should make him solid but here is the Twist. Instead of the Emperor always having those powers, make him have them when the sect leaders, who also have the respective power, are logged out. So that when you face an Imperial council the powers are all still available but there is not the gankage of double attempts at free disarm kick and trip. Twice the chance of healing curse, sigil etc and more than one of them being able to detect everyone?!
Just an idea that would make things a little more balance for the victims of an Imperial council gank.
-----Abernyte
P.S. Could also make the Emperor like a lich and unable to group. Then people can aid him or not aid him and take the risk of getting demoted or premoted.
|
|
|
|
Hunsobo would never have appointed a Shadow Lord.,
Twist,
05-May-08 08:05 PM, #2
Let's not forget...,
Mekantos,
05-May-08 10:26 PM, #3
If I could bash someone...,
Twist,
06-May-08 01:15 PM, #4
Then it would be the Emperors choice to 'weaken',
Abernyte,
07-May-08 05:14 AM, #5
too many russians play empire for this to work,
laxman,
07-May-08 10:03 AM, #6
Fair point -nt-,
Mekantos,
07-May-08 11:19 AM, #7
Cool idea,
Mekantos,
05-May-08 05:39 PM, #1
| |
  |
Mekantos | Mon 05-May-08 10:26 PM |
Member since 06th Dec 2003
796 posts
| |
|
#21314, "Let's not forget..."
In response to Reply #2
|
Healing curse? Dude, I had 300 mana. And there's a pretty damn easy save against it. I think I tried it like twice in his life.
You were using bash like it was going out of style (and it very well may have!)
|
|
|
|
  |
Abernyte | Wed 07-May-08 05:14 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
975 posts
| |
|
#21320, "Then it would be the Emperors choice to 'weaken'"
In response to Reply #2
|
his empire but not appointing so that on the off chance that his full council is present he cannot use the abilities? C'mon. Surely it would make sense to have some more power struggles going on.
Maybe make the Emperor able to use them all but the the lesser echelons, warmaster et al, cannot until the Emperor relinquishes it back to them. Makes for friction, makes for drama, makes for overthrowintg the Emperor.
This only applies when they are around together so is a dynamic equilibrium between the emperor and the council.
-----Abernyte
|
|
|
|
    |
laxman | Wed 07-May-08 10:03 AM |
Member since 18th Aug 2003
1867 posts
| |
|
#21321, "too many russians play empire for this to work"
In response to Reply #5
|
I just feel that making this change would increase the rate of perma that is found in empire.
|
|
|
|
      |
Mekantos | Wed 07-May-08 11:19 AM |
Member since 06th Dec 2003
796 posts
| |
|
#21322, "Fair point -nt-"
In response to Reply #6
|
|
|
|
Mekantos | Mon 05-May-08 05:39 PM |
Member since 06th Dec 2003
796 posts
| |
|
#21310, "Cool idea"
In response to Reply #0
|
It makes sense that a portion of that imperial power would be given from the Emperor to the Council, as a sort of checks and balances thing.
However, the Emperor would need a stand-alone power to compensate, I think. Potentially, he/she'd be more devastating when facing adversity...I'm alright with that.
|
|
|
|
|