|
|
#13853, "Ethos Change."
|
If a chaotic evil were to take the bloodoath, would he/she lose spec skills/legacies? I know the align changes you take blows, but what about ethos?
|
|
|
|
RE: Ethos Change.,
Karel,
13-Jul-06 03:16 AM, #1
This is correct as best I remember,
nepenthe,
13-Jul-06 10:39 AM, #2
RE: This is correct as best I remember,
crackednotbroke,
14-Jul-06 03:11 AM, #3
RE: This is correct as best I remember,
Karel,
14-Jul-06 10:35 AM, #4
RE: This is correct as best I remember,
Eskelian,
16-Jul-06 03:36 AM, #5
Some start with a Role, and then interactions guide...,
Cassman,
16-Jul-06 07:53 PM, #6
RE: Some start with a Role, and then interactions guide...,
Eskelian,
17-Jul-06 08:22 AM, #7
| |
|
Karel | Thu 13-Jul-06 03:16 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
569 posts
| |
|
#13854, "RE: Ethos Change."
In response to Reply #0
|
I'm not sure if this is the case anymore, but the only classes really hurt by an ethos change are empowerment ones. Otherwise all good. Unless you happen to be a Lyristeon follower, at which point getting changed to orderly may well result in a tiny foot in your ass. "Knowledge speaks, but wisdom listens." - Jimi Hendrix
|
|
|
|
  |
nepenthe | Thu 13-Jul-06 10:39 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
3430 posts
| |
|
#13857, "This is correct as best I remember"
In response to Reply #1
|
Our thought was, if you're a communer, it might be ok with your god that you're becoming orderly and swearing fealty to the Empire, and it might not. Thus, we kick your communing in the junk by default, and if your god is in fact totally cool with it, they can just turn the juice back on.
For best results, consult with your empowering deity first, which really RP should dictate you'd do anyway in almost all cases.
|
|
|
|
    |
|
#13864, "RE: This is correct as best I remember"
In response to Reply #2
|
What if it's a non-empowerment class- a warrior who is sphere chaotic and ethos chaotic. But a change in the role flow takes me to taking the bloodoath. So long as its valid with my role, will I be penalized? I'm sphere chaotic, but I worship a made-up God, not a Lyrist follower. Thoughts?
|
|
|
|
      |
Karel | Fri 14-Jul-06 10:35 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
569 posts
| |
|
#13867, "RE: This is correct as best I remember"
In response to Reply #3
|
Sure it'd be just fine. As far as the code goes you don't get penalized. As far as the imms go you have a role, whether or not it's spectacular (or craptacular). "Knowledge speaks, but wisdom listens." - Jimi Hendrix
|
|
|
|
      |
Eskelian | Sun 16-Jul-06 03:36 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
2023 posts
| |
|
#13871, "RE: This is correct as best I remember"
In response to Reply #3
|
Why would you do that?
Pick an ethos you want to play and stick with it. If you're going to mangle your char's RP, you're going to ruin the only part of the char that will matter in the end.
|
|
|
|
          |
Eskelian | Mon 17-Jul-06 08:22 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
2023 posts
| |
|
#13881, "RE: Some start with a Role, and then interactions guide..."
In response to Reply #6
|
In those rare situations, where its an act of good RP, the penalty isn't much of a deterrent since it would just get removed eventually. Rather, I find, flimsy enforcement of align/ethos only leads to flimsy execution of RP regarding align/ethos. Sorta like why align changes hurt so bad.
|
|
|
|
|