|
|
Aiekooso | Thu 18-May-06 03:45 PM |
Member since 18th Dec 2003
305 posts
|    |
|
#13173, "Just curious if this is a gameplay or bug issue."
|
From logs I've seen the rings of regeneration healing isn't affected by protections. Am I wrong or are they supposed to be that way?
|
|
|
|
  This is more a Scarabaeus question,
nepenthe ,
18-May-06 08:21 PM, #1
 I'll be the bitter complainer.,
Eclipse (Anonymous),
18-May-06 08:58 PM, #2
Why not an across the board change?,
Aiekooso,
19-May-06 09:06 PM, #3
Screw that.,
Eclipse (Anonymous),
20-May-06 01:30 PM, #4
This won't be changing. (n/t),
Valguarnera,
20-May-06 06:24 PM, #5
Thanks for the response. (n/t),
Eclipse (Anonymous),
20-May-06 09:09 PM, #6
His change, my change or both?,
Aiekooso,
20-May-06 09:40 PM, #7
| |
|
|
nepenthe | Thu 18-May-06 08:21 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
3430 posts
|  |
|
#13177, "This is more a Scarabaeus question"
In response to Reply #0
|
If I had to guess, they're supposed to be that way.
They used to be written in a way that protections would cut down, and someone (presumably Scarabaeus) changed that.
On the other hand, they used to heal roughly 4-5x as much, as a combination of firing much more often and healing more each time.
|
|
|
|
| | |
|
#13181, "I'll be the bitter complainer."
In response to Reply #1
|
How come an object heals through protections, but a creature (archon) who acts like a pc or npc healer (which are not burdened by protections) does not?
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Aiekooso | Fri 19-May-06 09:06 PM |
Member since 18th Dec 2003
305 posts
| |
|
#13200, "Why not an across the board change?"
In response to Reply #1
|
Healing items are rare enough that I wouldn't mind none of them being affected by protections. Off the top of my head I can only think of about 10-15 items that heal in combat. Could we please get these changed back?
|
|
|
|
| | |
|
#13211, "Screw that."
In response to Reply #3
|
How about making archons not object-like in their healing. I can accept the rings being better then other healing items, they are from an area explore. From a gameplay standpoint there is no logical reason archons should be burdened by protections.
Balance maybe yes, game logic no way.
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Valguarnera | Sat 20-May-06 06:24 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
6904 posts
| |
|
#13212, "This won't be changing. (n/t)"
In response to Reply #4
|
|
|
| | |
|
#13216, "Thanks for the response. (n/t)"
In response to Reply #5
|
|
|
| |
|
Aiekooso | Sat 20-May-06 09:40 PM |
Member since 18th Dec 2003
305 posts
| |
|
#13218, "His change, my change or both?"
In response to Reply #5
|
|
|
|
