|
|
Odrirg | Wed 12-Apr-06 04:41 PM |
Member since 16th Oct 2004
431 posts
|     |
|
#12887, "two questions, linked."
|
Let's say a warrior can somehow attack a camo ranger.
Let's say the ranger is waylaying the warrior, and the warrior dashes in to dirt the ranger.
First question to the Imms. What Wins, Dash? Or Waylay?
second question to imms and players. What SHOULD win in your opinion?
|
|
|
|
  Similar questions,
Kamuela_,
14-Apr-06 07:27 PM, #3
  RE: Similar questions,
Exit,
17-Apr-06 11:26 AM, #4
I believe dash beats thirst, but not orc berserk or eye...,
elmeri_,
21-Apr-06 12:27 PM, #5
RE: two questions, linked.,
nepenthe ,
12-Apr-06 05:46 PM, #2
RE: two questions, linked.,
DurNominator,
12-Apr-06 05:06 PM, #1
Not possible,
incognito,
21-Apr-06 06:01 PM, #6
Yes, there is.,
Odrirg,
21-Apr-06 06:15 PM, #7
I wouldn't call the inner a ranger,
incognito,
22-Apr-06 02:43 AM, #8
That's not his point,
Kamuela_,
23-Apr-06 11:47 AM, #9
Ok, I get the scenario,
incognito,
23-Apr-06 01:30 PM, #10
| |
| |
|
Exit | Mon 17-Apr-06 11:26 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
121 posts
| |
|
#12921, "RE: Similar questions"
In response to Reply #3
|
Answers:
1) Dash v. Thirst. Thirst wins.
2) Dash v. Berserker. Berserker wins.
3) Thirst + Dash v. Berserker. Berserker wins.
Thanks for playing.
-E.
|
|
|
|
| |
|
elmeri_ | Fri 21-Apr-06 12:27 PM |
Member since 13th Dec 2004
252 posts
| |
|
#12950, "I believe dash beats thirst, but not orc berserk or eye..."
In response to Reply #4
|
|
|
|
|
nepenthe | Wed 12-Apr-06 05:46 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
3430 posts
| |
|
#12891, "RE: two questions, linked."
In response to Reply #0
|
I'm not sure which wins. If I had to guess, I'd say waylay.
Probably waylay should win, but if it doesn't, I'm not sure that I'd care enough about this extremely rare case to change it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
DurNominator | Wed 12-Apr-06 05:06 PM |
Member since 08th Nov 2004
2018 posts
| |
|
#12889, "RE: two questions, linked."
In response to Reply #0
|
>Let's say a warrior can somehow attack a camo ranger.
So, our warrior has maelstrom and he knows that ranger is in other room.
>Let's say the ranger is waylaying the warrior, and the warrior
>dashes in to dirt the ranger.
>
>First question to the Imms. What Wins, Dash? Or Waylay?
>
>second question to imms and players. What SHOULD win in your
>opinion?
Waylay should win, because ranger was already there and warrior arrived to the ranger expecting him.
|
|
|
|
| |
|
incognito | Fri 21-Apr-06 06:01 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
4495 posts
| |
|
#12959, "Not possible"
In response to Reply #1
|
There is no way a warrior can "know" that a ranger is in the other room if the ranger is camo. That includes warriors with Maelstrom.
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Odrirg | Fri 21-Apr-06 06:15 PM |
Member since 16th Oct 2004
431 posts
| |
|
#12962, "Yes, there is."
In response to Reply #6
|
dashing into the outlander inner, for one.
|
|
|
|
| |
|
incognito | Sat 22-Apr-06 02:43 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
4495 posts
| |
|
#12964, "I wouldn't call the inner a ranger"
In response to Reply #7
|
Maybe it's just me, but I'd describe it as closest to a druid.
|
|
|
|
| |
|
incognito | Sun 23-Apr-06 01:30 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
4495 posts
| |
|
#12974, "Ok, I get the scenario"
In response to Reply #9
|
Just seems odd that a ranger would hide in a place where enemies would expect it if said enemies can see him.
Personally, I don't remember rangers ever doing that for me, and I raided the outlanders with Maelstrom a few times.
Normally the rangers camo'd in different places each time.
|
|
|
|
|
