|
Gryshilniar | Mon 20-Mar-06 06:53 PM |
Member since 31st Jan 2006
85 posts
| |
|
#12619, "Whoop"
In response to Reply #0
|
I've played many a Maran and no Forties are allowed to use Nightgaunts period. I remember with Grysh a certain squire used a smoke mephit and he was harsly scolded (yeah I'm teh harsh) because those little bastards are evil! And so nightgaunts is even worse.. I can't imagine any conjie getting away with it without being uninducted. So chances are he's not a fortie!
|
|
|
|
|
nepenthe | Mon 20-Mar-06 04:26 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
3430 posts
| |
|
#12618, "FYI:"
In response to Reply #0
|
I have not seen a squire/maran use nightgaunts recently, and I tend to keep a bit of an eye on that.
I suspect you're dealing with characters that you think are squires/maran but aren't.
|
|
|
|
|
jasmin | Mon 20-Mar-06 03:37 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
237 posts
| |
|
#12617, "Most of what you said is incorrect."
In response to Reply #0
|
Gulloth is the only conjurer in the fortress right now to my knowledge, and he was forbidden to use a nightgaunt to even help a person out of a trap room. Some goodie conjurers use them, but there has never been one in the fortress using them for any reason, because they would get booted. Uncaballed goodies take their chances calling them at times, but on Remoldezaire's battlefield, one of the imms said they came close to making him neutral. People do get alignment changes sometimes for doing those things, but yes role does come heavily into play. One instance I can think of, is the "use a diamond to cut a diamond" philosophy. Why beat your goodly servitors to death on foes, when you can have a gaunt beat itself to death on your foes? I don't always endorse this angle, but I have at least once with an uncaballed conjie. As for fort conjies using them, this is incorrect now, and incorrect in recent past. I can't speak to way back, because I didn't enter it til later.
|
|
|
|
|
Theerkla | Mon 20-Mar-06 03:32 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
1055 posts
| |
|
#12616, "If the imms didn't want them to use it"
In response to Reply #0
|
It would be alignment based. The paladin code would be strictly against it "11. Do not associate with the taint of evil, in any way." but I can't recall if the Maran code has something similar.
Smoke mephits are just as evil as nightgaunts, so merely from that perspective, they should be proscribed as well.
|
|
|
|
|