RE: (CON LOSS) [FORTRESS] Tahel Xyn'tavl the Pure of He...,
Bogba (Guest),
30-Mar-07 02:27 PM, #9
RE: (CON LOSS) [FORTRESS] Tahel Xyn'tavl the Pure of He...,
Dark Priest,
30-Mar-07 11:15 PM, #11
Awww...,
Sedd (Guest),
29-Mar-07 10:50 PM, #4
Had a blast!,
Dark Priest,
29-Mar-07 10:11 PM, #3
familiar release ;-) nt,
Sekhuroth (Guest),
30-Mar-07 01:45 AM, #5
Doesnt apply when one hit kills it. nt,
Dark Priest,
30-Mar-07 07:54 AM, #6
Don't even have it around during those times. nt,
Sekhuroth (Guest),
30-Mar-07 11:16 AM, #7
RE: Don't even have it around during those times. nt,
Dark Priest,
30-Mar-07 11:12 PM, #10
RE: (CON LOSS) [FORTRESS] Tahel Xyn'tavl the Pure of He...,
Waserax (Guest),
29-Mar-07 01:53 PM, #1
RE: (CON LOSS) [FORTRESS] Tahel Xyn'tavl the Pure of He...,
Dark Priest,
29-Mar-07 10:09 PM, #2
RE: (CON LOSS) [FORTRESS] Tahel Xyn'tavl the Pure of He...,
Trebilco (Guest),
30-Mar-07 11:54 AM, #8
| |
|
|
#56912, "RE: (CON LOSS) [FORTRESS] Tahel Xyn'tavl the Pure of He..."
In response to Reply #0
|
The RP of a dumb cloud giant berserker can be limited when it comes to long interactions, but your character was well played. I believed my characer was fighting a Maran, completely, down to how you reacted to frustrations and setbacks.
PK-wise, slippery and skilled, the times I should have won you managed a draw, and the times you should have won you, well..., spanked me
See you in the fields!
|
|
|
|
  |
Dark Priest | Fri 30-Mar-07 11:15 PM |
Member since 19th Dec 2003
205 posts
| |
|
#56935, "RE: (CON LOSS) [FORTRESS] Tahel Xyn'tavl the Pure of He..."
In response to Reply #9
|
Thank you very much, I'm glad I played a good Maran in your eyes. I enjoyed our (limited to fighting and a few words) interactions as well.
Best of luck!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#56887, "Awww..."
In response to Reply #0
|
Who am I going to find to do experiments with? With an archon healing you, we could go on for hours.
Always nice seeing you in the land and thinking, har, where did he run off to!
|
|
|
|
|
Dark Priest | Thu 29-Mar-07 10:11 PM |
Member since 19th Dec 2003
205 posts
| |
|
#56886, "Had a blast!"
In response to Reply #0
|
I had a blast. I really enjoyed this guy. In my 3-4 years at CF, it was my first conjurer over lvl 20 and my first maran. Both great experiences.
I'll keep goodbyes brief, but I'll reply to anyone that posts. I had a blast with the current Fortress folks, seems we have more Maran's recently which is a really good thing. I hope it starts a trend with Maraning people more often.
Well, time to think of my next to roll.
Good luck!
|
|
|
|
  |
|
#56893, "familiar release ;-) nt"
In response to Reply #3
|
|
|
    |
Dark Priest | Fri 30-Mar-07 07:54 AM |
Member since 19th Dec 2003
205 posts
| |
|
#56895, "Doesnt apply when one hit kills it. nt"
In response to Reply #5
|
|
|
      |
|
#56906, "Don't even have it around during those times. nt"
In response to Reply #6
|
|
|
        |
Dark Priest | Fri 30-Mar-07 11:12 PM |
Member since 19th Dec 2003
205 posts
| |
|
#56934, "RE: Don't even have it around during those times. nt"
In response to Reply #7
|
|
|
|
|
#56855, "RE: (CON LOSS) [FORTRESS] Tahel Xyn'tavl the Pure of He..."
In response to Reply #0
|
Gah. Had no idea you were so close to con death. That thing last night with Seriistian was just icky, then the followup at the Vanquisher must have smarted as well. Hope I wasn't the straw that broke the camel's back or anything. That certainly wasn't my intent.
|
|
|
|
  |
Dark Priest | Thu 29-Mar-07 10:09 PM |
Member since 19th Dec 2003
205 posts
| |
|
#56885, "RE: (CON LOSS) [FORTRESS] Tahel Xyn'tavl the Pure of He..."
In response to Reply #1
|
Not at all, I enjoyed our fights. I like to think that they may have gone a little different had I heroed. Just no groups around during my hours and when there were, I was either defending, fighting, or raiding.
|
|
|
|
    |
|
#56907, "RE: (CON LOSS) [FORTRESS] Tahel Xyn'tavl the Pure of He..."
In response to Reply #2
|
Damn that was quick, I remember you killing me when I was at 2% in the grove once. Damn I hated you
|
|
|
|
|