RE: (DELETED) [None] Oliveer Olicarina the Planewalker,
Jormyr,
15-Jul-17 02:32 PM, #1
RE: (DELETED) [None] Oliveer Olicarina the Planewalker,
Jhyrbian,
15-Jul-17 03:27 PM, #2
Who cares?,
FlatEarthIsReal,
15-Jul-17 04:07 PM, #3
word nt,
Mcbeth,
15-Jul-17 10:11 PM, #10
Less for his sake, more the community as a whole.,
Jormyr,
16-Jul-17 11:28 AM, #11
I think the majority of people..,
Lhydia,
16-Jul-17 11:57 AM, #12
Totally.,
FlatEarthIsReal,
16-Jul-17 04:49 PM, #13
In Soviet America, CF moves on from you! NT,
TMNS,
15-Jul-17 05:22 PM, #5
RE: (DELETED) [None] Oliveer Olicarina the Planewalker,
Bemused,
15-Jul-17 04:11 PM, #4
We could, but people would ignore it anyways,
Destuvius,
15-Jul-17 06:37 PM, #6
RE: We could, but people would ignore it anyways,
Bemused,
15-Jul-17 07:04 PM, #7
Your obsession with me is weird,
Destuvius,
15-Jul-17 07:16 PM, #8
Is he saying you were Gwildruidguy? n/t,
Lhydia,
15-Jul-17 07:26 PM, #9
Just send a note to culprit,
Kstatida,
17-Jul-17 09:55 AM, #15
What the hell??!,
TJHuron,
16-Jul-17 10:36 PM, #14
| |
|
Jormyr | Sat 15-Jul-17 02:32 PM |
Member since 31st Dec 2014
422 posts
| |
|
#131815, "RE: (DELETED) [None] Oliveer Olicarina the Planewalker"
In response to Reply #0
|
Short version: this character was designated a storage character, which comes with reduction in gear-searching abilities. In practice, this does very little beside remove the very top-end from convenient searching. Logically, if you weren't using it "that much", it wouldn't have been particularly impactful.
For reference, this character was nearly two years old. In the ENTIRE span of a year (roughly 2016), this character logged a total of six hours at one point. They also had the most login/logouts of any character I am currently aware of, which is also a common practice of gear lockers. Login, locate, get something cool if it's in, otherwise logout. Before his being hit by the hoard code, he was sitting around with nearly every unique piece of conjurer gear.
I do apologize that you never received response regarding your inquiry. I remember the note, but at the time was uncertain whether it was within my place to detail what happened, given I was not involved in that decision. It's typically somewhat rare to be applied, and seems to consistently end up being the same few players that end up logging in just long enough to look at their shinies. However, communication is something we could occasionally be better at.
Per HELP HOARDING
If you log on only very sparingly, you may forfeit some of Carrion Fields' most limited and coveted gear. This is done to make sure that these objects appear in the game with some regularity, thus allowing all players to have a fair chance at acquiring them. The rarity of the item will matter - a unique artifact will be lost more easily than a more common limited object.
All of the rules regarding login frequency are kept very 'loose' - we understand that players vary considerably in their ability and desire to play often, and we have set them this way to be inclusive of both casual and serious players. If you do lose an item to this mechanism, no reimbursements can or will be given, as it means you have not been playing your character enough to justify keeping those items out of circulation.
You were holding onto limited, rare, and multiple unique items while playing only an hour or two a week. No-one made special effort to remove your gear, you merely weren't playing. Beyond the designation as storage character (which this clearly was), nothing detrimental was done to this character, and it's design is exactly for situations where a character is clearly doing so, but also seeking to avoid both the hoard code and actually playing. I'm sorry you feel this makes the game unplayable, but players are welcome to play as much or little as they like. The hoarding code and storage character designation merely serve to encourage highly limited gear to remain in circulation and use. If you're only playing an hour or two a week, it's not going to break your experience not to have every unique piece of top-end gear for your class.
|
|
|
|
  |
Jhyrbian | Sat 15-Jul-17 03:27 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
917 posts
| |
|
#131816, "RE: (DELETED) [None] Oliveer Olicarina the Planewalker"
In response to Reply #1
|
cool but the player doesn't care, he's moved on from CF.
|
|
|
|
    |
|
#131817, "Who cares?"
In response to Reply #2
|
Why is this mud so obsessed with keeping detrimental players?
http://www.qhcf.net/phorum/search.php?5,author=2115,match_type=USER_ID,match_dates=0,match_threads=0
A quick glance at his post history shows just how detrimental. For one, he has quite "forever" before it seems. Also seems to do things specifically just to "spite immortals." Finally, not the first time apparently he has been in hot water for gear hoarding.
It's curious to me how obsessed players of this game get. Either play the game if you like it, or don't play it. It's just a game.
|
|
|
|
      |
Mcbeth | Sat 15-Jul-17 10:11 PM |
Member since 21st Jul 2015
257 posts
| |
|
#131824, "word nt"
In response to Reply #3
|
|
|
      |
Jormyr | Sun 16-Jul-17 11:28 AM |
Member since 31st Dec 2014
422 posts
| |
|
#131826, "Less for his sake, more the community as a whole."
In response to Reply #3
|
There were some accusations, and some misconceptions. Also, the lack of communication regarding his note to us was our fault.
Primarily, I wanted to be clear what he encountered, that no-one took special pains to force his gear to go away, and apologize where it was due. This is more for clarity, particularly in the case of a third party.
|
|
|
|
        |
|
#131828, "Totally."
In response to Reply #11
|
Appreciate the run down from you. "Who cares" was meant for the other guy as in "Who cares if he has moved on? It's good stuff to know."
|
|
|
|
    |
TMNS | Sat 15-Jul-17 05:22 PM |
Member since 10th Jun 2009
2670 posts
| |
|
#131819, "In Soviet America, CF moves on from you! NT"
In response to Reply #2
|
|
|
  |
Bemused | Sat 15-Jul-17 04:10 PM |
Member since 15th Oct 2013
665 posts
| |
|
#131818, "RE: (DELETED) [None] Oliveer Olicarina the Planewalker"
In response to Reply #1
Edited on Sat 15-Jul-17 04:11 PM
|
In future you will need to be more clear on how you want us to play our characters and spend our time lest some other unfortunate soul gets nerfed without warning. Perhaps add a room in the Academy outlining exactly what Umiron wants.
|
|
|
|
      |
Bemused | Sat 15-Jul-17 07:04 PM |
Member since 15th Oct 2013
665 posts
| |
|
#131821, "RE: We could, but people would ignore it anyways"
In response to Reply #6
|
If you can't see the issue with punishing people for them playing within the rules then I am lost for words.
You keep informing imms of various cabals that you will be creating ultra rare combinations within their cabal and then act all surprised when you are showered with gifts. We'll all act like you were deserving with your elite RP.
|
|
|
|
          |
Lhydia | Sat 15-Jul-17 07:26 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
2390 posts
| |
|
#131823, "Is he saying you were Gwildruidguy? n/t"
In response to Reply #8
|
|
|
      |
Kstatida | Mon 17-Jul-17 09:55 AM |
Member since 12th Feb 2015
2214 posts
| |
|
#131831, "Just send a note to culprit"
In response to Reply #6
|
|
|
  |
TJHuron | Sun 16-Jul-17 10:36 PM |
Member since 28th Nov 2007
1132 posts
| |
|
#131829, "What the hell??!"
In response to Reply #1
|
Am I misunderstanding you?
You knew this dude was a ####ty gear locker #### off character for a whole YEAR and nothing was done about it?
Pssht.
|
|
|
|
|