|
|
#11824, "Evading after strip"
|
1016hp 470m 856mv 4806tnl (74.57%)> Avara wraps the tail of a drolem around your weapon, stripping it from your hand! A mattock of tundra evergreen flies right to Avara and she catches it! Avara is in perfect health.
<1016hp 470m 856mv 4806tnl (74.57%)> Avara skillfully positions her body so that your boneshatter cannot succeed. Avara is in perfect health.
still had the boneshatter lag as well.
|
|
|
|
By design.,
Valguarnera,
18-Aug-07 11:24 AM, #1
RE: By design.,
Jhyrbian,
21-Aug-07 03:19 PM, #2
Correct.,
Valguarnera,
21-Aug-07 03:21 PM, #3
Hrm,
Mek (Guest),
22-Aug-07 10:52 AM, #4
RE: Hrm,
Daevryn,
22-Aug-07 10:52 AM, #5
Addenda:,
Daevryn,
22-Aug-07 10:54 AM, #6
| |
  |
Jhyrbian | Mon 20-Aug-07 11:21 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
919 posts
| |
|
#11852, "RE: By design."
In response to Reply #1
|
I think his problem is that he was stripped so he's no longer wielding that mace in his mainhand and he shouldn't have been able to boneshatter. Right?
Cheers, Jhyrb
|
|
|
|
      |
|
#11860, "Hrm"
In response to Reply #3
|
I understand that's the traditional way that all evade/mongoose-dodge type abilities have worked forever...but I cannot help but think that it's a bit nutty.
To elaborate on that, the abilities in question are basically making a "mechanics abuse" bug upon the person they are evading/dodging. In this case, Awk's character cannot even begin to try "stripping" hit opponent, since he has no whip, and yet the system is knocking him for it. He should probably get the "You must wield a whip or flail to strip your opponent" message.
I mean, its what I'd call an excessive punishment. The guy already got stripped, so chances are he's going to get his ass beat until he can re-arm, and then that just tacks on two rounds of lag too.
I just don't see how it helps the game, that's all.
|
|
|
|
        |
Daevryn | Wed 22-Aug-07 10:52 AM |
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
| |
|
#11866, "RE: Hrm"
In response to Reply #4
|
Long story short... the code is a lot easier that way.
I'm not saying it will never be changed, but I probably could write all the skills for a new class for a similar amount of work.
|
|
|
|
          |
Daevryn | Wed 22-Aug-07 10:54 AM |
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
| |
|
#11867, "Addenda:"
In response to Reply #5
|
I can imagine a couple possible abuses with the code as-is, but it's a more efficient management of my time to just deny anyone who sets out to exploit it.
|
|
|
|
|