|
Kstatida | Wed 08-Feb-17 03:10 PM |
Member since 12th Feb 2015
2214 posts
|   |
|
#66895, "It's not about Zagaer"
|
Screw the guy who rolled solely for ganking, I'm sure if he's smart enough, he'll do his part of lowbie solo kills gathering next time.
I'm talking about general bard playability, which I think will be better with the proposed change.
|
|
|
 A bard anti-gank code suggestion
[View all] , Kstatida, Wed 08-Feb-17 09:07 AM
  RE: A bard anti-gank code suggestion,
Jormyr,
08-Feb-17 01:38 PM, #23
  I knew I was good,
Ganky bard (Anonymous),
08-Feb-17 02:47 PM, #24
RE: I knew I was good,
Jormyr,
08-Feb-17 03:00 PM, #25
It's not about Zagaer,
Kstatida,
08-Feb-17 03:10 PM #26
RE: It's not about Zagaer,
incognito,
09-Feb-17 02:05 AM, #30
Mind sharing your edge points with me?,
Ganky bard (Anonymous),
09-Feb-17 02:29 AM, #33
Yeah, Daurvryn, give him EP so he can gank,
Murphy,
09-Feb-17 02:36 AM, #34
Worry not, I'm gonna share some with you,
Ganky bard (Anonymous),
09-Feb-17 02:40 AM, #36
RE: Mind sharing your edge points with me?,
incognito,
09-Feb-17 09:52 AM, #38
See above,
Kstatida,
09-Feb-17 09:07 AM, #37
As implemented, code is counter-productive,
Saagkri,
08-Feb-17 12:48 PM, #19
I think it's based on current GoM,
Kstatida,
08-Feb-17 12:51 PM, #20
Songs never fail 1 v 1,
lasentia,
08-Feb-17 12:56 PM, #21
Correct,
Saagkri,
09-Feb-17 01:25 PM, #41
Kill 20 people solo and you're back on track,
Kstatida,
10-Feb-17 04:18 AM, #42
It looks to me like this is one thing (not that there a...,
TJHuron,
08-Feb-17 09:58 AM, #6
This isn't about the sole purpose ganking character,
Kstatida,
08-Feb-17 11:31 AM, #9
Been there since my first bard ,
lasentia,
08-Feb-17 12:05 PM, #14
My fiends were useless as a Elf Romantic.,
TMNS,
08-Feb-17 03:44 PM, #27
I agree but not re high int issue,
incognito,
09-Feb-17 02:08 AM, #31
the only edge we can afford these days,
Murphy,
09-Feb-17 02:39 AM, #35
I actually don't like this,
lasentia,
08-Feb-17 09:33 AM, #4
On the other hand,
Kstatida,
08-Feb-17 11:23 AM, #8
Well no,
lasentia,
08-Feb-17 11:51 AM, #10
Warriors don't have AOE attacks.,
Murphy,
08-Feb-17 12:03 PM, #12
That doesn't matter.,
lasentia,
08-Feb-17 12:09 PM, #15
RE: That doesn't matter.,
Kstatida,
08-Feb-17 12:45 PM, #18
I looked at it.,
Murphy,
08-Feb-17 10:15 PM, #29
RE: On the other hand,
Grembolin (Anonymous),
08-Feb-17 11:55 AM, #11
Nobody cares,
Murphy,
08-Feb-17 12:04 PM, #13
Butthurt?,
Grembolin (Anonymous),
08-Feb-17 12:12 PM, #16
About what?,
Murphy,
08-Feb-17 10:40 PM, #28
Haha,
Grembolin (Anonymous),
09-Feb-17 11:05 AM, #39
Your hatred for ragers is obvious,
Kstatida,
09-Feb-17 12:21 PM, #40
You've posted the log.,
Kstatida,
08-Feb-17 12:27 PM, #17
RE: You've posted the log.,
Grembolin (Anonymous),
08-Feb-17 01:21 PM, #22
I'd like to see them lower the anti-gank threshold acro...,
Sarien,
08-Feb-17 09:09 AM, #1
Knowing your bias,
Kstatida,
08-Feb-17 09:12 AM, #2
The current super-gank bunch isn't limited to only gank...,
Sarien,
08-Feb-17 09:14 AM, #3
And you address it how?,
Murphy,
08-Feb-17 09:42 AM, #5
How I'd address it? Probably wouldn't be popular,
Sarien,
08-Feb-17 10:18 AM, #7
RE: The current super-gank bunch isn't limited to only ...,
incognito,
09-Feb-17 02:14 AM, #32
| |
|
