Subject: "I've always felt learning should be "primary" stat based" Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #57949
Show all folders

SarienMon 12-Jan-15 02:42 PM
Member since 14th Feb 2009
740 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#57956, "I've always felt learning should be "primary" stat based"
Edited on Mon 12-Jan-15 02:43 PM

          

Example:

Str based skills should check STR for skillups (parry/possibly weapons/etc)

INT based - int

dex based dex

etc/et al.

My rationale is, I was a nerd in highschool - I was not good at sports. I couldn't play defensive tackle even if I wanted to, sure with a LOT LOT LOT of practice I could overcome the fact that in H.S. I was a 130lb bean pole soaking wet, but it'd take me longer than someone with the "recommended" physical attributes.

Elves should not advance quickly in parrying, because they suck at it.

Giants should, as physical based fighting is 2nd nature.

I don't think that there should be 1 stat to rule them all when it comes to skill learning.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

Topic% Learned per practice [View all] , Tac, Sun 11-Jan-15 08:54 PM
Reply I had an idea recently, Artificial, 12-Jan-15 09:30 AM, #3
Reply I've always felt learning should be "primary" stat base..., Sarien, 12-Jan-15 02:43 PM #4
     Reply Except.., KaguMaru, 12-Jan-15 03:07 PM, #5
          Reply RE: Except.., Daevryn, 12-Jan-15 07:49 PM, #6
          Reply This kind of reinforces my point, Sarien, 13-Jan-15 02:28 PM, #7
               Reply I disagree slightly, lasentia, 13-Jan-15 03:08 PM, #8
Reply I don't think that's stock code?, KaguMaru, 12-Jan-15 04:43 AM, #1
     Reply What I posted is stock Rom 2.3, Tac, 12-Jan-15 08:37 AM, #2
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #57949 Previous topic | Next topic