Splntrd | Mon 27-Jun-11 02:21 PM |
Member since 08th Feb 2004
1096 posts
| |
|
#38672, "RE: Scorched Earth"
|
>However, what I see is a guy who has tried time and time again >to make up for his past behaviors in ways that add positively >to the game. As such, I have no problem with this project.
What you DON'T see is that there's a lot of good reasons to believe these aren't past behaviors, but continuing. The logs that got passed around after his orc went to hell last year are pretty good evidence of that.
>Granted, I'd like to see most of this information kept locally >by players, but if someone has to keep an eye on the database, >I'd just as soon have it be Torak if it's not going to be an >IMM or a player like Isildur (none of whom have said they want >the responsibility.)
Local storage is by the far going to be the only option the staff will support, which was how they responded the last attempt at something similar (CFI). The problem is, how would they catch and punish anyone for using it if for some reason the creator rebels? It's not something that's going to be easily detectable.
Splntrd
|
|
|
It's time to give back....say hello to CarrionDashboard
[View all] , Torak, Sun 26-Jun-11 11:52 PM
Why did the immortals let you come back, but not krilco...,
wikataw,
04-Jul-11 04:41 PM, #57
RE: Why did the immortals let you come back, but not kr...,
Rayihn,
04-Jul-11 05:54 PM, #58
I apologize.,
wikataw,
04-Jul-11 07:12 PM, #59
Complained about it and then did some more of it yourse...,
Vortex Magus,
04-Jul-11 09:30 PM, #60
DID HE SERIOUSLY SAY PILLAGE YOUR WOMB?,
Stevers,
04-Jul-11 10:08 PM, #61
Give me feedback! [Searching],
Torak,
29-Jun-11 06:27 PM, #52
RE: Give me feedback! [Searching],
Rayihn,
29-Jun-11 07:05 PM, #53
There is a fairly simple solution to this....,
Tac,
30-Jun-11 08:04 AM, #54
Well at that point,
Dallevian,
30-Jun-11 09:05 AM, #55
You misunderstand.,
Splntrd,
01-Jul-11 10:56 AM, #56
Hey,
Mek,
28-Jun-11 02:02 AM, #43
My Advice,
Splntrd,
27-Jun-11 05:31 PM, #39
Looks pretty good, I'd make use of this. ,
Elerosse,
27-Jun-11 12:29 PM, #31
I like pretty much all of these ideas.,
lasentia,
27-Jun-11 11:20 AM, #25
I've always thought that feature would be better implem...,
Stevers,
27-Jun-11 11:32 AM, #27
NECK.,
Dallevian,
27-Jun-11 09:33 AM, #12
Agreed,
Valkenar,
27-Jun-11 10:34 AM, #15
Well, there's a problem with that,
Torak,
27-Jun-11 10:59 AM, #19
Better yet, give it a feature to add a tab rather than ...,
Stevers,
27-Jun-11 11:06 AM, #24
I like this.,
Stevers,
27-Jun-11 08:10 AM, #6
Well here's a question,
Torak,
27-Jun-11 10:44 AM, #18
RE: Well here's a question,
Stevers,
27-Jun-11 11:01 AM, #22
like the idea, hate the thought of giving a player with...,
laxman,
27-Jun-11 06:33 AM, #5
Oh come on,
Torak,
27-Jun-11 10:43 AM, #17
hey TLB you lost the right to say come on,
laxman,
27-Jun-11 11:03 AM, #23
I was wondering how long it'd take someone to say TLB,
Torak,
27-Jun-11 11:26 AM, #26
that fact is very pertinent to this thread,
laxman,
27-Jun-11 11:44 AM, #28
Yeah, hand them off to someone credible. Someone like ...,
Stevers,
27-Jun-11 11:48 AM, #29
More than the TLB nt,
laxman,
27-Jun-11 01:52 PM, #32
Scorched Earth,
Homard,
27-Jun-11 11:58 AM, #30
RE: Scorched Earth,
Splntrd,
27-Jun-11 02:21 PM #34
yeah this is spot on,
laxman,
27-Jun-11 04:32 PM, #36
uhhh,
Artificial,
27-Jun-11 04:44 PM, #37
RE: uhhh,
Stevers,
28-Jun-11 07:57 AM, #48
RE: yeah this is spot on,
Splntrd,
27-Jun-11 04:59 PM, #38
Some food for thought,
Mek,
27-Jun-11 05:49 PM, #40
RE: Some food for thought,
TheDude,
27-Jun-11 06:22 PM, #41
RE: Some food for thought,
Mek,
28-Jun-11 02:07 AM, #44
because obviously his questionable behavior is not in t...,
laxman,
28-Jun-11 08:19 AM, #49
RE: because obviously his questionable behavior is not ...,
Mek,
28-Jun-11 03:42 PM, #51
Given Torak's previous history,
Vortex Magus,
27-Jun-11 09:47 PM, #42
Explorers were just CF vets,
BaronMySoul (Anonymous),
28-Jun-11 07:43 AM, #47
Except Lewis and Clark did that for the advancement of ...,
Stevers,
28-Jun-11 10:00 AM, #50
Don't be stupid.,
Splntrd,
27-Jun-11 02:15 PM, #33
I like this.,
Nnaeshuk,
27-Jun-11 05:29 AM, #4
It could be set up so that you have to add items in man...,
Stevers,
27-Jun-11 08:12 AM, #7
Even if I did pure local,
Torak,
27-Jun-11 10:49 AM, #20
I dont see a problem with that. If it's on Diku, then ...,
Stevers,
27-Jun-11 10:57 AM, #21
Seems like the way to go, to me. Props. nt,
Splntrd,
27-Jun-11 02:22 PM, #35
RE: I like this.,
ORB,
27-Jun-11 08:59 AM, #9
Thanks,
Torak,
27-Jun-11 10:37 AM, #16
Why should only imms be allowed?,
Chris Royse (Anonymous),
28-Jun-11 06:15 AM, #45
Oi,
Mek,
27-Jun-11 01:17 AM, #2
Couple of questions,
BaronMySoul (Anonymous),
27-Jun-11 12:43 AM, #1
Couple of answers,
Torak,
27-Jun-11 01:55 AM, #3
No mass import. That encourages cheating.,
Stevers,
27-Jun-11 08:17 AM, #8
RE: No mass import. That encourages cheating.,
ORB,
27-Jun-11 09:00 AM, #10
Because this wouldn't have to be monitored by Imms.,
Stevers,
27-Jun-11 09:04 AM, #11
RE: Couple of answers,
BaronMySoul (Anonymous),
27-Jun-11 09:52 AM, #13
I'll think about CMUD integration,
Torak,
27-Jun-11 10:21 AM, #14
RE: I'll think about CMUD integration,
BaronMySoul (Anonymous),
28-Jun-11 07:30 AM, #46
| |
|