lasentia | Mon 27-Jun-11 11:20 AM |
Member since 27th Apr 2010
987 posts
| |
|
#38661, "I like pretty much all of these ideas."
|
Kept within the bounds of what is permissible information, this would be a good resource for newer players and older ones alike. So long as the explore items and stuff that's not supposed to be there is not kept there, it has a lot of potential to be good for CF.
I like the idea of being able to store char info too. Sort of like a database of players and people they've played, completely voluntary of course, with links to their pbfs and maybe their death thread if possible if they exist. I would say this would encourage more pbf purchases, not deter them, since I think I would be more inclined to get my pbfs if it were becoming part of my CF char resume (which sucks but still). Lots of times you always see on battlefield threads the question who did you play before and it's sometimes nice to attribute a player with more than just their most recent char. Then I could just update my CF login profile with a link so you could click my name, and there you go, a list of my past chars with pbf links where applicable.
|
|
|
It's time to give back....say hello to CarrionDashboard
[View all] , Torak, Sun 26-Jun-11 11:52 PM
Why did the immortals let you come back, but not krilco...,
wikataw,
04-Jul-11 04:41 PM, #57
RE: Why did the immortals let you come back, but not kr...,
Rayihn,
04-Jul-11 05:54 PM, #58
I apologize.,
wikataw,
04-Jul-11 07:12 PM, #59
Complained about it and then did some more of it yourse...,
Vortex Magus,
04-Jul-11 09:30 PM, #60
DID HE SERIOUSLY SAY PILLAGE YOUR WOMB?,
Stevers,
04-Jul-11 10:08 PM, #61
Give me feedback! [Searching],
Torak,
29-Jun-11 06:27 PM, #52
RE: Give me feedback! [Searching],
Rayihn,
29-Jun-11 07:05 PM, #53
There is a fairly simple solution to this....,
Tac,
30-Jun-11 08:04 AM, #54
Well at that point,
Dallevian,
30-Jun-11 09:05 AM, #55
You misunderstand.,
Splntrd,
01-Jul-11 10:56 AM, #56
Hey,
Mek,
28-Jun-11 02:02 AM, #43
My Advice,
Splntrd,
27-Jun-11 05:31 PM, #39
Looks pretty good, I'd make use of this. ,
Elerosse,
27-Jun-11 12:29 PM, #31
I like pretty much all of these ideas.,
lasentia,
27-Jun-11 11:20 AM #25
I've always thought that feature would be better implem...,
Stevers,
27-Jun-11 11:32 AM, #27
NECK.,
Dallevian,
27-Jun-11 09:33 AM, #12
Agreed,
Valkenar,
27-Jun-11 10:34 AM, #15
Well, there's a problem with that,
Torak,
27-Jun-11 10:59 AM, #19
Better yet, give it a feature to add a tab rather than ...,
Stevers,
27-Jun-11 11:06 AM, #24
I like this.,
Stevers,
27-Jun-11 08:10 AM, #6
Well here's a question,
Torak,
27-Jun-11 10:44 AM, #18
RE: Well here's a question,
Stevers,
27-Jun-11 11:01 AM, #22
like the idea, hate the thought of giving a player with...,
laxman,
27-Jun-11 06:33 AM, #5
Oh come on,
Torak,
27-Jun-11 10:43 AM, #17
hey TLB you lost the right to say come on,
laxman,
27-Jun-11 11:03 AM, #23
I was wondering how long it'd take someone to say TLB,
Torak,
27-Jun-11 11:26 AM, #26
that fact is very pertinent to this thread,
laxman,
27-Jun-11 11:44 AM, #28
Yeah, hand them off to someone credible. Someone like ...,
Stevers,
27-Jun-11 11:48 AM, #29
More than the TLB nt,
laxman,
27-Jun-11 01:52 PM, #32
Scorched Earth,
Homard,
27-Jun-11 11:58 AM, #30
RE: Scorched Earth,
Splntrd,
27-Jun-11 02:21 PM, #34
yeah this is spot on,
laxman,
27-Jun-11 04:32 PM, #36
uhhh,
Artificial,
27-Jun-11 04:44 PM, #37
RE: uhhh,
Stevers,
28-Jun-11 07:57 AM, #48
RE: yeah this is spot on,
Splntrd,
27-Jun-11 04:59 PM, #38
Some food for thought,
Mek,
27-Jun-11 05:49 PM, #40
RE: Some food for thought,
TheDude,
27-Jun-11 06:22 PM, #41
RE: Some food for thought,
Mek,
28-Jun-11 02:07 AM, #44
because obviously his questionable behavior is not in t...,
laxman,
28-Jun-11 08:19 AM, #49
RE: because obviously his questionable behavior is not ...,
Mek,
28-Jun-11 03:42 PM, #51
Given Torak's previous history,
Vortex Magus,
27-Jun-11 09:47 PM, #42
Explorers were just CF vets,
BaronMySoul (Anonymous),
28-Jun-11 07:43 AM, #47
Except Lewis and Clark did that for the advancement of ...,
Stevers,
28-Jun-11 10:00 AM, #50
Don't be stupid.,
Splntrd,
27-Jun-11 02:15 PM, #33
I like this.,
Nnaeshuk,
27-Jun-11 05:29 AM, #4
It could be set up so that you have to add items in man...,
Stevers,
27-Jun-11 08:12 AM, #7
Even if I did pure local,
Torak,
27-Jun-11 10:49 AM, #20
I dont see a problem with that. If it's on Diku, then ...,
Stevers,
27-Jun-11 10:57 AM, #21
Seems like the way to go, to me. Props. nt,
Splntrd,
27-Jun-11 02:22 PM, #35
RE: I like this.,
ORB,
27-Jun-11 08:59 AM, #9
Thanks,
Torak,
27-Jun-11 10:37 AM, #16
Why should only imms be allowed?,
Chris Royse (Anonymous),
28-Jun-11 06:15 AM, #45
Oi,
Mek,
27-Jun-11 01:17 AM, #2
Couple of questions,
BaronMySoul (Anonymous),
27-Jun-11 12:43 AM, #1
Couple of answers,
Torak,
27-Jun-11 01:55 AM, #3
No mass import. That encourages cheating.,
Stevers,
27-Jun-11 08:17 AM, #8
RE: No mass import. That encourages cheating.,
ORB,
27-Jun-11 09:00 AM, #10
Because this wouldn't have to be monitored by Imms.,
Stevers,
27-Jun-11 09:04 AM, #11
RE: Couple of answers,
BaronMySoul (Anonymous),
27-Jun-11 09:52 AM, #13
I'll think about CMUD integration,
Torak,
27-Jun-11 10:21 AM, #14
RE: I'll think about CMUD integration,
BaronMySoul (Anonymous),
28-Jun-11 07:30 AM, #46
| |
|