Isildur | Tue 24-Feb-09 02:42 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
5969 posts
| |
|
#23907, "RE: Please allow for the fact"
|
Instead of using "hours as squire" as a metric (not the only metric, but one you're using) you might try to come up with ballpark "achievement" metrics based on each class, and maybe level range.
Like, if you squire a shield paladin at 25 and then he ranks to 40, what sort of PK record should he have accumulated in order to get Maran? What about a felar assassin? Human thief? Etc.
You'd need to take into account specializations like thief paths, paladin dedications, warrior specs, etc. Also the character's gank-o-meter. The PKs aren't as impressive if they're just the result of the guy being ganky. Also special cases where a person might get inducted as a hero (where it's harder to amass PKs).
So then, if a character kicks butt and meets your requirement in less time than normal, maybe he makes Maran early. (Assuming his RP is also up to snuff).
On the other hand if after some "reasonable" amount of time, a character still hasn't met the PK requirement, maybe he has to keep chugging along as a Squire until he does.
(I realize this doesn't work for Acolytes, since PK isn't one of their priorities.)
|
|
|
Maran
[View all] , Tac, Mon 23-Feb-09 02:07 PM
RE: Maran,
Daevryn,
23-Feb-09 08:43 PM, #21
Because you totally didn't bring that on yourself. nt,
Scrimbul,
23-Feb-09 09:44 PM, #22
It's true.,
Daevryn,
23-Feb-09 10:19 PM, #23
RE: It's true.,
Dark Priest,
24-Feb-09 12:18 PM, #35
Next time I have the time....,
Tac,
24-Feb-09 09:23 AM, #27
RE: Next time I have the time....,
Isildur,
24-Feb-09 10:04 AM, #28
that's exactly what I was thinking.,
Aodh,
24-Feb-09 10:06 AM, #29
So in a world where people have less time on their hand...,
Scrimbul,
24-Feb-09 12:25 PM, #36
This whole thread is silly,
Baerinika,
24-Feb-09 12:38 PM, #38
Please allow for the fact,
incognito,
24-Feb-09 01:54 PM, #40
More importantly,
incognito,
24-Feb-09 01:56 PM, #41
I hate ap's and necros nt,
Baerinika,
24-Feb-09 02:00 PM, #43
RE: Please allow for the fact,
Baerinika,
24-Feb-09 01:59 PM, #42
RE: Please allow for the fact,
Isildur,
24-Feb-09 02:42 PM #44
I think I do that already,
Baerinika,
24-Feb-09 02:59 PM, #45
Arguing aside,
BaronMySoul (Anonymous),
24-Feb-09 04:47 PM, #48
RE: Arguing aside,
Isildur,
24-Feb-09 05:09 PM, #49
Members,
Baerinika,
24-Feb-09 05:16 PM, #52
RE: Members,
Sarien,
25-Feb-09 11:34 AM, #67
Evil Outlanders and picking off squires,
Twist,
24-Feb-09 05:12 PM, #51
Problem with player promotions:,
Aodh,
24-Feb-09 05:24 PM, #53
because they have an ulterior motive?,
incognito,
24-Feb-09 05:27 PM, #55
RE: because they have an ulterior motive?,
Zulghinlour,
24-Feb-09 06:49 PM, #60
If you've seen the Fortress members command...,
Zulghinlour,
24-Feb-09 03:17 PM, #46
That's a very good point,
incognito,
24-Feb-09 05:26 PM, #54
RE: So in a world where people have less time on their ...,
Isildur,
24-Feb-09 12:43 PM, #39
You are wasting the effort Isildur put into compiling t...,
Adhelard,
24-Feb-09 03:24 PM, #47
RE: You are wasting the effort Isildur put into compili...,
Isildur,
24-Feb-09 05:10 PM, #50
You're lucky I'm a sucker for statistics. txt,
Isildur,
24-Feb-09 06:46 PM, #59
I think we're all lucky,
Adhelard,
24-Feb-09 07:47 PM, #65
RE: I think we're all lucky,
Isildur,
24-Feb-09 08:31 PM, #66
=P,
Lhydia,
24-Feb-09 07:05 PM, #62
Well... Then you should try Scion as it is.,
Amberion,
23-Feb-09 06:21 PM, #14
RE: Well... Then you should try Scion as it is.,
Isildur,
23-Feb-09 06:27 PM, #17
Battle sucks sometimes....,
Tac,
23-Feb-09 06:31 PM, #19
Well...,
Vortex Magus,
24-Feb-09 10:57 AM, #31
That would be a chancellor's decision, not immortal one,
Tac,
23-Feb-09 06:28 PM, #18
Agreed, as Cedek I got in after 2 easy interveiws....,
Amberion,
23-Feb-09 07:52 PM, #20
I think it sort of stems from the origination of the ca...,
Theerkla,
23-Feb-09 06:04 PM, #12
RE: Maran,
Isildur,
23-Feb-09 02:52 PM, #3
Also consider,
Baerinika,
23-Feb-09 02:56 PM, #4
RE: Also consider,
Isildur,
23-Feb-09 03:49 PM, #5
I was intrigued,
Mekantos,
23-Feb-09 04:39 PM, #8
Consider this from my side, then.,
Dallevian,
23-Feb-09 05:35 PM, #10
RE: Consider this from my side, then.,
Isildur,
23-Feb-09 06:01 PM, #11
I'm lazy....,
Tac,
23-Feb-09 06:27 PM, #16
From Endalion's PBF,
DurNominator,
23-Feb-09 05:16 PM, #9
RE: Maran,
Adhelard,
23-Feb-09 03:58 PM, #6
RE: Maran,
Isildur,
23-Feb-09 04:12 PM, #7
Speaking only for myself, not Baerinika...,
Twist,
23-Feb-09 02:23 PM, #2
Well....,
Tac,
23-Feb-09 06:23 PM, #15
So, Maraning is just PK-based?,
BaronMySoul (Anonymous),
24-Feb-09 08:45 AM, #24
RE: So, Maraning is just PK-based?,
Daevryn,
24-Feb-09 08:53 AM, #26
You won't be playing Empire either then...,
Zulghinlour,
23-Feb-09 02:20 PM, #1
Getting Maran = Becoming Sect Leader?,
Tac,
23-Feb-09 06:15 PM, #13
Have you crunched the numbers?,
BaronMySoul (Anonymous),
24-Feb-09 08:50 AM, #25
RE: Have you crunched the numbers?,
Zulghinlour,
24-Feb-09 11:09 AM, #32
RE: Have you crunched the numbers?,
Isildur,
24-Feb-09 12:01 PM, #34
Do you want to take a stab at time to Elite?,
Adhelard,
24-Feb-09 12:38 PM, #37
RE: Do you want to take a stab at time to Elite?,
Isildur,
24-Feb-09 06:53 PM, #61
I don't know about you.,
Vortex Magus,
24-Feb-09 10:51 AM, #30
RE: I don't know about you.,
Zulghinlour,
24-Feb-09 11:11 AM, #33
re: backstabbing,
Aodh,
24-Feb-09 05:37 PM, #56
RE: re: backstabbing,
Daevryn,
24-Feb-09 06:28 PM, #57
RE: re: backstabbing,
Isildur,
24-Feb-09 07:22 PM, #63
Backstabbing is only part of it,
Twist,
24-Feb-09 07:46 PM, #64
RE: I don't know about you.,
Daevryn,
24-Feb-09 06:32 PM, #58
| |
|