>Well, for the record, I'm not sure if this exists or not. But
>it would be cool if backstage somewhere there was a guideline
>as to what constitutes as "gear-whorey" and what does not. Or
>whether some rank sitting conjurer/druid should get a title,
>or whether they should not. It just seems sorta arbitrary. One
>person's actions get punished, another defended and it pretty
>much all boils down to which imm is observing and what their
>personal opinions on the subject are.

In this case the title was merited by a sequence of specific actions, including:

1) A bunch of complaining that single members of enemy cabals whose items were held wouldn't come and fight (despite one such character in range making constant, if not stupid enough to result in death, attempts).

2) Over-the-top ganging of a different such character who made an attempt, followed by looting 100% of that character's items. Food, stuff no one wanted, everything.

3) RP with other characters primarily involving what good gear other people had and how much we wanted it.

4) A mad dash (there's more here, but I don't really want to get into it) to loot the corpse of an out of range person who died to a bad teleport.

About half an hour later we noticed the title and prayed about it; unfortunately, at this time we were

5) Killing mobs people in our cabal (at the very least, of this alignment) shouldn't be killing in the quest for gear. (This also is slightly complicated and I don't want to get into it in greater depth.)

I don't know. How do you write guidelines for that?