Subject: "I agree that the maran is the weakest inner guardian but.." Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #4954
Show all folders

PhaistusSat 26-Jun-04 12:40 AM
Member since 27th Aug 2003
186 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#4973, "I agree that the maran is the weakest inner guardian but.."


          

The configuration of the inner part of the fortress is easily the deadliest of all the cabals when you have people there to help defend. The "pronged" defense I think more than makes up for the fact that it is the weakest guardian.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

TopicFortress Inner, transplant from Shok's Forum [View all] , Graatch (inactive user), Fri 25-Jun-04 01:52 PM
Reply I agree that the maran is the weakest inner guardian bu..., Phaistus, 26-Jun-04 12:40 AM #10
Reply RE: I agree that the maran is the weakest inner guardia..., (NOT Graatch), 26-Jun-04 01:20 AM, #11
Reply uhm., shokai, 25-Jun-04 09:41 PM, #5
Reply RE: uhm., (NOT Graatch), 25-Jun-04 11:30 PM, #7
Reply RE: Fortress Inner, transplant from Shok's Forum, Valkenar, 25-Jun-04 02:29 PM, #2
Reply RE: Fortress Inner, transplant from Shok's Forum, Straklaw, 25-Jun-04 02:41 PM, #3
Reply I like the idea, permanewbie, 25-Jun-04 02:08 PM, #1
     Reply Agreed., General_Malaise, 25-Jun-04 05:01 PM, #4
          Reply RE: Agreed., Nhiala, 25-Jun-04 10:11 PM, #6
          Reply Understood., General_Malaise, 25-Jun-04 11:35 PM, #8
               Reply Hmmm, Phaelim (Anonymous), 26-Jun-04 12:01 AM, #9
                    Reply I think the comment was made because of this ...txt ins..., Bajula, 26-Jun-04 11:01 AM, #12
                    Reply My train of thought, General_Malaise, 30-Jun-04 09:19 AM, #14
          Reply With Yanaceck, Drag0nSt0rm, 28-Jun-04 03:34 PM, #13
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #4954 Previous topic | Next topic