>This wield seems wrong. I would like to see it so that no
>matter what you wield, it will go into that wield spot and
>remove whatever is in your dual wield if it's not compatable.
>Realistically if you want to wield an axe that's lighter why
>hold on to that heavier sword in the offhand.
>
>Is this something that was overlooked? Purposely kept in? Or
>just not possible to do? Or none of the above?

It wasn't overlooked, it was a conscious decision, since it seemed for every person who wants it this way, there is someone who wants it the way it is. There isn't a way to get the best of both worlds.

So long, and thanks for all the fish!