Subject: "I like this change" This topic is locked.
Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #15543
Show all folders

ValkenarThu 14-Dec-06 11:35 AM
Member since 04th Mar 2003
1203 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#15591, "I like this change"


          

My experience is pretty much the opposite. With my current character I've teleported away from a losing pk probably a hundred times, usually pretty low on hp and I'm pretty sure I've only died once as a result. I've gotten bad teleports, but a second teleport has always saved me. The way teleport worked before, combined with the size CF is now, meant that carrying two potions virtually guaranteed safety. Your odds of two bad teleports in a row is pretty tiny.

I never even use recall potions anymore because of the drawbacks. Going to a predictable location where people can set traps or enemies can just randomly happen to be is way worse than being in some random spot nobody goes to. And the fact is that most rooms in CF are out of the way. Having a healer at recall helps, but I still find it riskier to recall than teleport.

And I think it's silly that teleport is a better escape than word, since it's clearly meant to be the other way (word is higher level when people get it, more expensive in potion form and halves moves).

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy

HOT Locked TopicTeleportation [View all] , Nivek1, Wed 13-Dec-06 07:57 PM
Reply Locked on account of dogpiling. (n/t), Valguarnera, 18-Dec-06 09:59 AM, #73
Reply Nonsense., Eskelian, 15-Dec-06 01:19 AM, #58
Reply I demand Kaubris's teleport in replacement, Tac, 14-Dec-06 04:17 PM, #46
Reply I think you missed the point of this change., Scrimbul, 14-Dec-06 04:52 PM, #47
     Reply Oh I don't actually care..., Tac, 14-Dec-06 05:13 PM, #48
          Reply People have had them, Valkenar, 14-Dec-06 06:30 PM, #52
Reply I like this change, Valkenar, 14-Dec-06 11:35 AM #32
Reply Additional suggestion, Marcus_, 14-Dec-06 07:19 AM, #23
Reply This is semi-true:, Daevryn, 14-Dec-06 08:27 AM, #24
     Reply I am! :) nt, Astillian, 14-Dec-06 02:00 PM, #38
          Reply Heh.. me too. Hollar!, Sebeok, 14-Dec-06 02:06 PM, #39
               Reply RE: Heh.. me too. Hollar!, terinth, 17-Dec-06 03:22 AM, #70
Reply RE: Teleportation, NNNick, 14-Dec-06 06:12 AM, #22
Reply I am now faced with walk and get assassinated or port a..., Abernyte, 14-Dec-06 06:04 AM, #21
Reply Heh, don't know about Nivek's minority...., Straklaw, 14-Dec-06 04:50 AM, #20
Reply There are no attractors., Valguarnera, 14-Dec-06 10:47 AM, #28
Reply I need a forum trigger., Valguarnera, 13-Dec-06 10:47 PM, #9
Reply You know..., Daevryn, 13-Dec-06 11:03 PM, #10
Reply RE: You know..., (NOT Pro), 14-Dec-06 01:29 AM, #14
Reply I wouldn't necessarily say that., TheLastMohican, 13-Dec-06 11:11 PM, #11
Reply Re: Time constraints:, Valguarnera, 13-Dec-06 11:36 PM, #13
Reply RE: I need a forum trigger., Nivek1, 13-Dec-06 11:20 PM, #12
Reply Well, well, well, TheDude, 13-Dec-06 08:53 PM, #1
     Reply RE: Well, well, well, Daevryn, 13-Dec-06 10:23 PM, #2
     Reply God for bid if you teleport into water!, (NOT Pro), 13-Dec-06 10:23 PM, #3
     Reply 99% sure you still can't. :P (n/t), Daevryn, 13-Dec-06 10:25 PM, #5
     Reply RE: Well, well, well, nebel, 13-Dec-06 10:24 PM, #4
     Reply What was wrong with having a spell, (NOT Pro), 13-Dec-06 10:33 PM, #6
          Reply RE: What was wrong with having a spell, Daevryn, 13-Dec-06 10:35 PM, #7
          Reply For what it's worth., (NOT Pro), 14-Dec-06 01:35 AM, #15
               Reply RE: For what it's worth., Daevryn, 14-Dec-06 01:53 AM, #17
               Reply Well then.., Sebeok, 14-Dec-06 10:41 AM, #26
               Reply RE: For what it's worth., (NOT Pro), 14-Dec-06 10:44 AM, #27
                    Reply RE: For what it's worth., Daevryn, 14-Dec-06 10:53 AM, #29
                    Reply And, hell, I'll elaborate on that., Daevryn, 14-Dec-06 11:01 AM, #31
                         Reply Wich still has nothing to do with my opinion, (NOT Pro), 14-Dec-06 12:58 PM, #34
                              Reply I think you're missing his point, Sebeok, 14-Dec-06 01:12 PM, #36
                              Reply You can be as angry as you like of course., (NOT Pro), 14-Dec-06 03:26 PM, #42
                                   Reply RE: You can be as angry as you like of course., Daevryn, 14-Dec-06 03:53 PM, #44
                                        Reply Why do you guys even bother arguing with Pro?, _Magus_, 14-Dec-06 06:12 PM, #51
                                        Reply RE: Why do you guys even bother arguing with Pro?, (NOT Pro), 15-Dec-06 01:18 AM, #57
                                        Reply I don't think you even know what I was saying originall..., (NOT Pro), 15-Dec-06 01:16 AM, #56
                                             Reply RE: I don't think you even know what I was saying origi..., Sebeok, 15-Dec-06 10:38 AM, #65
                                             Reply RE: I don't think you even know what I was saying origi..., Valkenar, 15-Dec-06 11:29 AM, #66
                                                  Reply Exactly., Daevryn, 15-Dec-06 11:54 AM, #67
                              Reply RE: Wich still has nothing to do with my opinion, BigJ, 14-Dec-06 06:41 PM, #53
                    Reply RE: For what it's worth., Valguarnera, 14-Dec-06 11:01 AM, #30
                         Reply WHAT?!?!, (NOT Graatch), 14-Dec-06 12:03 PM, #33
                         Reply I think you're a good counterexample., Valguarnera, 14-Dec-06 01:51 PM, #37
                              Reply Stop it, you're making me blush., (NOT Graatch), 14-Dec-06 02:22 PM, #40
                              Reply What I'm confussed about., (NOT Pro), 14-Dec-06 03:31 PM, #43
                              Reply It isn't anti-Pro, it's anti-####tard, Tac, 14-Dec-06 04:15 PM, #45
                                   Reply This post rules too, _Magus_, 14-Dec-06 05:48 PM, #50
                                   Reply RE: This post rules too, (NOT Pro), 15-Dec-06 01:26 AM, #61
                                        Reply Emboldened?, _Magus_, 15-Dec-06 05:29 PM, #68
                                        Reply Pro: Please Help Yourself, vargal, 16-Dec-06 02:57 AM, #69
                                   Reply RE: It isn't anti-Pro, it's anti-####tard, (NOT Pro), 15-Dec-06 01:24 AM, #60
                              Reply This post rules. The Imm staff has always been on my A-..., _Magus_, 14-Dec-06 05:42 PM, #49
                         Reply Anonymous., (NOT Pro), 14-Dec-06 01:01 PM, #35
                              Reply RE: Anonymous., Valkenar, 14-Dec-06 07:00 PM, #54
                              Reply RE: Anonymous., (NOT Pro), 15-Dec-06 01:23 AM, #59
                              Reply RE: Anonymous., Rogue, 18-Dec-06 09:41 AM, #72
               Reply RE: For what it's worth., Mayaletha, 14-Dec-06 03:16 PM, #41
               Reply I'm not complaining about the changes to teleport., (NOT Pro), 15-Dec-06 01:30 AM, #62
                    Reply Like Nep said.., DurNominator, 15-Dec-06 09:38 AM, #64
               Reply This is a fine corner you've painted yourself into..., Wilhath, 14-Dec-06 07:07 PM, #55
               Reply RE: For what it's worth., DurNominator, 15-Dec-06 09:30 AM, #63
          Reply You don't read before you post do you?, Rogue, 18-Dec-06 09:26 AM, #71
     Reply Something in this I missed on the first pass..., Daevryn, 13-Dec-06 10:46 PM, #8
          Reply Ya mighta saved some heart ache, (NOT Pro), 14-Dec-06 01:36 AM, #16
          Reply Or you could figure it out?, GinGa, 14-Dec-06 03:15 AM, #18
               Reply RE: Or you could figure it out?, Daevryn, 14-Dec-06 08:30 AM, #25
          Reply Thanks for addressing our concerns a bit man, TheDude, 14-Dec-06 03:26 AM, #19
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #15543 Previous topic | Next topic