Subject: "RE: The best analogy" Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions New Player Q&A Topic #1024
Show all folders

nepentheFri 18-Nov-05 07:07 PM
Member since 04th Mar 2003
3430 posts
Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#1032, "RE: The best analogy"


          

This is pretty true.

If you're going to pay attention to shifting (i.e., you're going to be actively using your dedicate moves), two-hander is better.

If you're not (i.e. you're going to spend more time healing, using attack communes, or bashed into next week), shielder is better.

Neither is really a better choice overall; it depends on your style of play and the specifics of your character. If you want to play more like a warrior with sanc/heal, two hand looks good, and if you want to play more like a healer or mage, shield looks good, and so on.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

TopicPaladins [View all] , SandMan, Thu 17-Nov-05 04:53 PM
Reply RE: The Dedicate Command:, Valguarnera, 18-Nov-05 09:51 AM, #2
Reply RE: Paladins, Aarn, 17-Nov-05 07:36 PM, #1
     Reply While both still get four skills.., SPN, 18-Nov-05 11:39 AM, #3
          Reply The best analogy, Theerkla, 18-Nov-05 12:50 PM, #4
               Reply This analogy makes me think of a versatile two-hander p..., DurNominator, 18-Nov-05 02:41 PM, #5
               Reply This might be the funniest thing I have heard in awhile..., SPN, 18-Nov-05 02:43 PM, #6
               Reply RE: The best analogy, nepenthe, 18-Nov-05 07:07 PM #7
Top General Discussions New Player Q&A Topic #1024 Previous topic | Next topic