>This is interesting timing, as a staff member just asked me
>about this as well (and pulled the trigger, so Brayan is
>gone).

http://forums.carrionfields.com/dc/dcboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=6&topic_id=66979&mesg_id=66979&listing_type=search

I asked about this. Recently. And was given a different answer. Specifically this one: http://forums.carrionfields.com/dc/dcboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=6&topic_id=66979&mesg_id=66983&page=

While I don't believe giving Glikhardiz the same treatment will be done, that was... I believe fairly obviously... the point of my initial post.

>Outing yourself is never a good idea (though it's typically
>done in farewell posts), as it conflicts with our first two
>rules. (Though some may say that such a character is not
>creating ANY advantage for himself.) I'm less inclined to
>judge intent, but the "Characters created strictly to annoy
>others will be removed" rule does seem to be in play here as
>well.

This character was not created with any intent to strictly annoy others. At least any further than any pickpocket thief who hates magic would be. I'm not arguing against the ban, as I believe outting a character should get you banned, but judging the character to be strictly to annoy others should be based on more than a couple of logs.

>Our (sometimes deplorable) CF culture has undergone some
>strange changes in recent years. While I don't oppose full
>looting by itself, targeting new players does not do anything
>to enhance this game.

To target a new player, one would have to know they were a new player. I have no way to know if a character is new. I was also not the aggressor in latest log. If a mage comes to the village and picks a fight, what is a village character supposed to do?