>I think we both knew this was coming. You were a good
>warder, and it made me laugh when people said that you never
>logged in (albeit this was over a month ago) because I knew
>you were on pretty much daily, just opposite hours of most
>of the sylvans.

Yep I was around every single day actually but being a Chef tends to lend some rather odd hours to my day. MOrnings often and late night.


We had some good times and bad, bad
>generally was just us needing to learn from a mistake or
>two, and good being...good. I enjoyed the interactions we
>had, but I know what you mean to an extent about knowing who
>plays who..the problem is, this doesn't stop at aim. Some
>players are transparent, and the chatrings out there don't
>make things better, however interesting they actually are.

I can think of maybe 3 players who are transparent, at least to me. But knowing everyone ooc was difficult and more troubel then it was worth. I would try to interact with people in a IC way a little off the cuff and could almost feel them staring at their monitor like "What then hell is he doing?". Also it tends to bleed over and when you look at a character you just see Billyjo478 (example) from aim, and not a storm giant warrior with an eye patch, poor temperament, and a love of juniper berries. (also example)

>Good luck with what you're on.


>
>"What you need is a good lowbie ranger to learn pk with.
>When he distents too far, delete and do it again. After the
>second or third one, some people will hate you, but you'll
>know how people react in pk situations."

I think I do as well as I want to in pk situations. Pk isnt to important to me. I am rather surprised my ratio was that good. As Faelmort posted once, Shamans are now one of the hardest classes to pk with as people know how to handle them. I had a lot of trouble with it.

POSTER'S DISCLAIMER: "Of course....I don't play anymore, but its just my 2 cents."