Subject: "Not Kanaev." Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions The Battlefield Topic #57255
Show all folders

Ilden (Guest)Tue 10-Apr-07 09:27 AM

  
#57263, "Not Kanaev."


          

But I think you'd find evil conjurers a bit more interesting than you give them credit.

It takes a certain amount of panache to survive servitors at times and its probably not as tacticless and simple as it would seem from an enemy's perspective.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

Topic(RAGE DELETE) [BATTLE] Fhaen Drusan the Legend of the B... [View all] , Death_Angel, Mon 09-Apr-07 06:48 PM
Reply RE: (RAGE DELETE) [BATTLE] Fhaen Drusan the Legend of t..., Fhaen (Guest), 09-Apr-07 09:18 PM, #1
     Reply What?, Shooloo (Guest), 10-Apr-07 01:57 AM, #2
     Reply The Real Truth, Theroc (Guest), 10-Apr-07 09:12 AM, #3
     Reply Not Kanaev., Ilden (Guest), 10-Apr-07 09:27 AM #4
     Reply Hmph, Nuloh (Guest), 10-Apr-07 10:28 AM, #5
     Reply RE: Hmph, Fhaen (Guest), 10-Apr-07 11:44 AM, #6
     Reply RE: (RAGE DELETE) [BATTLE] Fhaen Drusan the Legend of t..., Brinkmun (Guest), 10-Apr-07 07:03 PM, #7
     Reply RE: (RAGE DELETE) [BATTLE] Fhaen Drusan the Legend of t..., Eulinda (Guest), 10-Apr-07 08:53 PM, #8
     Reply regarding a pbf comment, Chuntogian (Guest), 14-Apr-07 12:56 PM, #9
          Reply Isn't it obvious?, Otherside (Guest), 14-Apr-07 02:13 PM, #10
               Reply Not really, Chuntogian (Guest), 14-Apr-07 02:27 PM, #11
                    Reply Just to point out as well, bored (Guest), 14-Apr-07 02:42 PM, #12
                    Reply RE: Not really, Daevryn, 14-Apr-07 03:53 PM, #13
                         Reply Hours of Fhaen!! Answer to you all within., Fhaen (Guest), 14-Apr-07 04:58 PM, #14
                         Reply RE: Not really, Chuntogian (Guest), 14-Apr-07 05:17 PM, #15
                              Reply RE: Not really, Daevryn, 14-Apr-07 08:50 PM, #16
Top General Discussions The Battlefield Topic #57255 Previous topic | Next topic