>Grogim: You were always willing to speak, and never hesitated
>to give advice, but never tried to interfere. I liked that a
>lot.
>
>Thats the way I like to try and do things. Sometimes cryptic,
>sometimes very straightforward advice. I have been on the end,
>as a mortal, of interference and I even deleted a character
>over it so I police myself strongly on what advice I give and
>what actions I try to stir up within the village.
>
>I could echo Gherian's sentiments entirely by remarking on
>your great heart for the battle. It is the singley most
>important quality for a villager and major egos need not
>apply. You will fight great, you will win battle but you WILL
>get ganked by gangs and left nothing and it's the way you deal
>with that aspect, which makes you a good villager in my book.
> I have played three rangers in my time in battle, one was
>when rangers still had bears and bloodthirst made you hit them
>and the last two were cloud giants, one berserker and one
>scout. It is very tough to keep your time in the wilderness
>high and do all the raiding and defending, which often
>detracts from your abilities so your right in thinking a rager
>ranger is very tough to play and keep control of, telling
>yourself over and over, 'stay in the woods!'
>Anyway, very well done on a fine villager and I hope your
>reincarnate soon if you have not done so already.
>
>-----Grogim
>
>

Yeah I will probably play another ranger again, and he will not be in battle, though another character probably will since I love battle. But the next ranger will be easy to stay in the woods with. I think you are a good imm and hope you stick it out and go higher places.