Odrirg | Fri 23-Sep-05 10:23 AM |
Member since 16th Oct 2004
431 posts
| |
|
#755, "Without any specifics...an idea"
|
I am, generally, in favor of less gangs. But I can't say anything about this change specifically, because no specifics were given (and I sorta understand why).
However. There are logs of certain very powered characters, facing these large gangs solo...and not only surviving, but kicking ass.
Logs of Paladins, and Liches, mostly. If a 4 on one against a paladin with ubber gear and some nice virtues not only gets 2 of the attackers dead, but leaves the paladin nearly untouched, why should that paladin get a boost from this new anti-ganging code?
Maybe some people die to massive gangs, because bringing anything less than a massive gang is insufficient and will most likely result in the death of the attackers?
Maybe there can be something in the code that allows any anti-ganging code to be relaxed for those characters who are acknowledged as UBBER.
I'm not necessarilly saying use pk stats, because often those who kill the most also die alot, I'm saying about those characters who have found a magic combination of race/class/skill/eq/imm benefite that make them near impossible to take down completely without a numbers advantage (unless they do something stupid).
|
|
|
new anti-ganging code
[View all] , Sebeok, Thu 22-Sep-05 08:02 PM
I like!,
Xaannix,
03-Sep-07 03:31 PM, #38
Ahem,
Xaannix,
06-Sep-07 04:31 PM, #39
Well-pleased. Thank you to all who made it possible ~,
Abernyte,
09-Apr-07 07:12 PM, #37
RE: new anti-ganging code,
valrow22,
07-Apr-07 02:19 PM, #35
A few thoughts for you,
Terwin05,
08-Apr-07 01:07 PM, #36
Anti-Gang Code Empowered!,
nepenthe,
10-Dec-05 12:50 AM, #30
Orcs,
Wilhath,
10-Dec-05 03:24 PM, #31
I have a plan! (n/t),
nepenthe,
10-Dec-05 03:24 PM, #32
Moooore Anti-gang Empowerment!,
Daevryn,
03-Apr-07 02:01 AM, #33
RE: Moooore Anti-gang Empowerment!,
Marcus_,
03-Apr-07 02:50 AM, #34
Thanks Sebeok, I think a comeback is in the works now. ...,
Minyar,
15-Nov-05 12:15 AM, #29
Very nice Seb, Good work.,
Oddjob,
19-Oct-05 07:09 PM, #27
I <3 U. 'Nuff said nt,
shamanman,
24-Sep-05 10:14 AM, #25
Nice job Sebeok. Appreciate your work in this. n/t,
Lightmage,
24-Sep-05 09:10 AM, #23
Do people really do that?,
(NOT Pro),
23-Sep-05 03:16 PM, #17
Sadly, yes.,
Sebeok,
23-Sep-05 03:19 PM, #21
Without any specifics...an idea,
Odrirg,
23-Sep-05 10:24 AM #11
RE: Without any specifics...an idea,
Sebeok,
23-Sep-05 10:26 AM, #12
RE: Without any specifics...an idea,
Rastorenn (Anonymous),
23-Sep-05 10:29 AM, #13
RE: Without any specifics...an idea,
Aarn,
23-Sep-05 01:37 PM, #16
Speaking from experience with Dorn lately,
jasmin,
23-Sep-05 03:16 PM, #20
Sounds quite promising.,
appelsien,
23-Sep-05 10:22 AM, #9
Fan-bloody-tastic! Three cheers for Sebeok! ~,
Abernyte,
23-Sep-05 09:46 AM, #5
Why don't you attack the root of the problem instead of...,
laxman,
23-Sep-05 09:46 AM, #4
RE: Why don't you attack the root of the problem instea...,
Sebeok,
23-Sep-05 10:10 AM, #6
If gangs get worse add "battle-chaos" code,
Theerkla,
23-Sep-05 10:22 AM, #8
I like that a lot.,
(NOT Pro),
23-Sep-05 03:16 PM, #19
your missing the point,
laxman,
23-Sep-05 12:39 PM, #14
I understood the point.,
Sebeok,
23-Sep-05 12:41 PM, #15
Why must people die? Seriously?,
(NOT Pro),
23-Sep-05 03:16 PM, #18
RE: your missing the point,
Eskelian,
23-Sep-05 07:29 PM, #22
RE: Why don't you attack the root of the problem instea...,
Evil Genius (Anonymous),
23-Sep-05 10:22 AM, #7
I believe his argument is,
incognito,
24-Sep-05 09:10 AM, #24
RE: Why don't you attack the root of the problem instea...,
Rastorenn (Anonymous),
23-Sep-05 10:24 AM, #10
I think that,
Xaannix,
19-Oct-05 07:21 PM, #26
That already happens.,
Sebeok,
19-Oct-05 07:43 PM, #28
RE: new anti-ganging code,
Evil Genius (Anonymous),
23-Sep-05 06:57 AM, #3
Good idea,
Nivek1,
22-Sep-05 09:47 PM, #2
RE: new anti-ganging code,
Larcat,
22-Sep-05 09:10 PM, #1
| |
|