|
#3507, "RE: Do we need more specs for warriors?"
|
>2) I don't get why you think they're "one of the most linear >classes" before legacies. First, specialization is a >major choice that adds a lot of variety. Second, warriors >play very differently from one race to another, and that's >less true of other classes.
As a shifter, whatever your race is, you'll never know what forms you'll get in a certain focus unless you have an imm source or something. As a conjie, you'll never know what fam you'll get bla bla.. But as a warrior, spin will still be spin, chop will still be chop and cranial will bla bla. You'll know that spin is a rocking skill, you'll know exactly when you'll get it, and you'll know your giant will dodge like ####, spin or not. That's pretty linear in my book.
Any thoughts on how to break the monotony other than doing something like a felar sword spec or elven axe spec that address people with 'dude'?
|
|
|
Do we need more specs for warriors?
[View all] , Circuits Edge (inactive user), Fri 16-Jan-04 08:48 AM
I think specs are fine just as they are.,
Vladamir,
16-Jan-04 08:45 PM, #6
RE: Do we need more specs for warriors?,
Valguarnera,
16-Jan-04 01:40 PM, #1
RE: Do we need more specs for warriors?,
Circuits Edge (Anonymous),
16-Jan-04 02:15 PM #2
RE: Do we need more specs for warriors?,
Zulghinlour,
16-Jan-04 02:33 PM, #3
RE: Do we need more specs for warriors?,
incognito,
16-Jan-04 04:31 PM, #4
RE: Possible fix for you,
Mekantos,
16-Jan-04 07:02 PM, #5
| |
|