|
|
#3492, "Do we need more specs for warriors?"
|
Yes I know, warriors just got legacies recently, and that's all fine and dandy, but, the specs have remained the same for a number of years now, and really, unlike with some classes, shifters in particular, you're never really surprised.
Are there any plans to perhaps remove some spec skills and add new ones, or even add a new weapon to specialize in? You can mix the specs anyway you choose with races that they would never work with, but they're still the same old specs.
Warriors are pretty low on the priority list I wager, but they are still one of the most linear classes up till legacies.
|
|
|
|
I think specs are fine just as they are.,
Vladamir,
16-Jan-04 08:45 PM, #6
RE: Do we need more specs for warriors?,
Valguarnera,
16-Jan-04 01:40 PM, #1
RE: Do we need more specs for warriors?,
Circuits Edge (Anonymous),
16-Jan-04 02:15 PM, #2
RE: Do we need more specs for warriors?,
Zulghinlour,
16-Jan-04 02:33 PM, #3
RE: Do we need more specs for warriors?,
incognito,
16-Jan-04 04:31 PM, #4
RE: Possible fix for you,
Mekantos,
16-Jan-04 07:02 PM, #5
| |
  |
|
#3507, "RE: Do we need more specs for warriors?"
In response to Reply #1
|
>2) I don't get why you think they're "one of the most linear >classes" before legacies. First, specialization is a >major choice that adds a lot of variety. Second, warriors >play very differently from one race to another, and that's >less true of other classes.
As a shifter, whatever your race is, you'll never know what forms you'll get in a certain focus unless you have an imm source or something. As a conjie, you'll never know what fam you'll get bla bla.. But as a warrior, spin will still be spin, chop will still be chop and cranial will bla bla. You'll know that spin is a rocking skill, you'll know exactly when you'll get it, and you'll know your giant will dodge like ####, spin or not. That's pretty linear in my book.
Any thoughts on how to break the monotony other than doing something like a felar sword spec or elven axe spec that address people with 'dude'?
|
|
|
|
    |
Zulghinlour | Fri 16-Jan-04 02:33 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
9792 posts
| |
|
#3508, "RE: Do we need more specs for warriors?"
In response to Reply #2
|
>As a shifter, whatever your race is, you'll never know what >forms you'll get in a certain focus unless you have an imm >source or something. As a conjie, you'll never know what fam >you'll get bla bla..
So in your eyes, every class but shifter & conjurer are linear. So long, and thanks for all the fish!
|
|
|
|
    |
incognito | Fri 16-Jan-04 04:31 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
4495 posts
| |
|
#3510, "RE: Do we need more specs for warriors?"
In response to Reply #2
|
warriors are imho the most variable of classes, with the possible exception of thieves.
A drow axe spec does not play like a giant, and that's before you throw in legacies.
Being serious, no one has yet exhausted warrior options, so I don't see why new ones are needed.
|
|
|
|
    |
Mekantos | Fri 16-Jan-04 07:02 PM |
Member since 06th Dec 2003
796 posts
| |
|
#3513, "RE: Possible fix for you"
In response to Reply #2
|
Play less warriors if you are playing so many as to come to this conclusion. That class is, overall:
-Fun -Powerful -Interesting
...so I can't help but think that you, personally, may have just played too many warriors or something.
|
|
|
|
|