Valguarnera | Mon 29-Sep-08 08:39 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
6904 posts
| |
|
#34803, "Screwing over other players first, sloth second."
|
If we're going to include all rules violations, the #1 motivator by a wide margin is an attempt to screw over one or more other players.
Ganking permas, dropping link to avoid PK, OOC tirades including spam, bug exploitation, the annual jerk who tries to make the whole MUD (WANTED), that one jackass who serially follows heroes around and tries to take and sac their stuff, etc.
If there is enough cheating by seemingly unrelated parties, aimed at a particular goal, do you guys ever think, "Hmmm, maybe this is a tad too difficult if this many people will cheat to accomplish it."
The #2 motivator is ego. It's the same reason people cheat at pickup basketball by grabbing shirts, or why people on online games go bonkers if you beat them and screw up their 'rating'. They want to 'win' however they define winning, whether or not they're good enough to do it.
Multi-ing gear is an example here-- and a lot of gear movement is for fairly mundane stuff. Ditto people who try to arrange cabal inductions OOC, etc.
I think you're proposing the answers you want to hear, and not anything based on the experiences of the staff who handle these cases.
valguarnera@carrionfields.com
|
|
|
The Party Analogy.
[View all] , Valguarnera, Wed 01-Oct-08 07:46 AM
Bumping an old-ass thread.,
Valguarnera,
24-Sep-08 07:57 PM, #70
Okay this was just funny (to me),
Bajula,
26-Sep-08 11:16 AM, #20
While I'm generally ok,
Dwoggurd,
26-Sep-08 01:13 PM, #21
RE: While I'm generally ok,
Bajula,
26-Sep-08 05:20 PM, #22
RE: While I'm generally ok,
Isildur,
26-Sep-08 05:33 PM, #23
This analogy has flaws,
Dwoggurd,
26-Sep-08 06:19 PM, #24
RE: This analogy has flaws,
Isildur,
26-Sep-08 06:30 PM, #25
Re,
Dwoggurd,
26-Sep-08 06:42 PM, #26
RE: Re,
Isildur,
26-Sep-08 08:47 PM, #27
Thanks for dropping by! n/t,
Stunna,
27-Sep-08 12:59 PM, #31
RE: Re,
Daevryn,
27-Sep-08 02:51 PM, #32
RE: Re,
Xanthrailles,
27-Sep-08 02:55 PM, #33
Heh Heh. Good one. n/t,
Stunna,
27-Sep-08 04:21 PM, #34
RE: Testing.,
Valguarnera,
27-Sep-08 05:58 PM, #35
Heh Heh. Good one. n/t,
Stunna,
27-Sep-08 10:09 PM, #37
RE: This analogy has flaws,
Bajula,
27-Sep-08 03:24 AM, #28
This situation has flaws.,
Lyristeon,
27-Sep-08 07:17 PM, #36
I don't understand,
Dwoggurd,
27-Sep-08 10:11 PM, #38
I don't understand why this is being argued.,
Java,
27-Sep-08 11:09 PM, #40
I think because there is no party without us.,
TheLastMohican,
28-Sep-08 02:06 PM, #48
Umm.. yeah. Thus proving the party analogy once again. ...,
Java,
28-Sep-08 02:38 PM, #49
RE: I don't understand,
Isildur,
27-Sep-08 11:10 PM, #41
So,
Dwoggurd,
27-Sep-08 11:56 PM, #42
RE: So,
Isildur,
28-Sep-08 12:20 AM, #43
Re,
Dwoggurd,
28-Sep-08 12:48 AM, #44
RE: Re,
Isildur,
28-Sep-08 09:14 AM, #45
Isildur is nailing it on the head.,
Lyristeon,
28-Sep-08 09:27 AM, #46
I dig the party analogy; although, it does have players...,
Boon,
30-Sep-08 01:21 AM, #62
RE: I dig the party analogy; although, it does have pla...,
Java,
30-Sep-08 08:25 AM, #65
RE: I dig the party analogy; although, it does have pla...,
Lyristeon,
30-Sep-08 04:57 PM, #69
You can't have a party without guests, chief. n/t,
Stunna,
27-Sep-08 10:14 PM, #39
I can accept that.,
Lyristeon,
28-Sep-08 09:33 AM, #47
HOLY analOGY, BATMAN!!,
Mekantos,
28-Sep-08 04:04 PM, #51
There are significant differences to any common party,
Kanjiro,
27-Sep-08 09:12 AM, #29
You just don't get it...,
Zulghinlour,
28-Sep-08 02:55 PM, #50
Question,
Mekantos,
28-Sep-08 04:11 PM, #52
RE: Question,
Zulghinlour,
28-Sep-08 05:29 PM, #53
RE: Question,
Daevryn,
28-Sep-08 06:48 PM, #54
Lol go for it! -nt-,
Mekantos,
28-Sep-08 11:24 PM, #56
RE: Question,
Isildur,
28-Sep-08 08:55 PM, #55
Screwing over other players first, sloth second.,
Valguarnera,
29-Sep-08 08:39 PM #57
Ego vs hassle,
Dwoggurd,
29-Sep-08 09:19 PM, #58
Typically,
Daevryn,
29-Sep-08 09:43 PM, #59
I grant you my permission,
Dwoggurd,
29-Sep-08 11:17 PM, #60
Sadly....,
Torak,
30-Sep-08 02:20 AM, #63
RE: Sadly....,
Daevryn,
30-Sep-08 09:41 AM, #66
Well...,
Torak,
30-Sep-08 11:12 AM, #67
He does have a site..,
Elerosse,
30-Sep-08 11:30 AM, #68
Easy there lockjaw,
Mekantos,
30-Sep-08 01:20 AM, #61
The sporting analogy is debatable,
incognito,
30-Sep-08 02:51 AM, #64
Did my thread get deleted?,
Eskelian,
02-Oct-08 07:56 AM, #71
Heh.,
Rooqweaz,
03-Oct-03 07:06 AM, #18
RE: Heh.,
Rogardian,
03-Oct-03 08:44 AM, #1
Maybe it's the drugs.,
Jhyrbian,
03-Oct-03 08:51 AM, #2
P.S,
Jhyrbian,
03-Oct-03 08:52 AM, #3
Tell you what: (quasi-tongue in cheek),
nepenthe,
03-Oct-03 09:53 AM, #5
the country isn't even a democracy,
incognito,
03-Oct-03 01:10 PM, #10
I disagree,
Yanoreth,
03-Oct-03 10:05 AM, #6
That was a waste of your time Yanoreth...Roq's,
Xaannix,
05-Oct-03 01:33 AM, #19
RE: Heh.,
Valguarnera,
03-Oct-03 11:57 AM, #8
One remark,
Rooqweaz,
04-Oct-03 07:06 AM, #11
Are you...,
Zepachu,
04-Oct-03 10:24 AM, #12
I can quit any time I want!,
Quislet,
06-Oct-03 09:17 AM, #15
Heh, this reminds me of the old " *addict* " social. -n...,
Kanjiro,
27-Sep-08 08:48 AM, #30
Re: Accountability.,
Valguarnera,
04-Oct-03 12:30 PM, #13
Better yet, think of a football game.,
Stunna,
03-Oct-03 12:42 PM, #9
I agree with Zulg on his post and,
Xaannix,
05-Oct-03 01:29 AM, #14
CF isn't a government,
Zulghinlour,
03-Oct-03 12:44 PM, #17
What do imm's owe us?,
kellog (Anonymous),
06-Oct-03 02:46 PM, #16
As I started the thread in question....,
Laearrist,
03-Oct-03 10:49 AM, #7
Amen (n/t),
Yanoreth,
03-Oct-03 09:53 AM, #4
| |
|