Subject: "Screwing over other players first, sloth second." This topic is locked.
Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #34742
Show all folders

ValguarneraMon 29-Sep-08 08:39 PM
Member since 04th Mar 2003
6904 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list
#34803, "Screwing over other players first, sloth second."


          

If we're going to include all rules violations, the #1 motivator by a wide margin is an attempt to screw over one or more other players.

Ganking permas, dropping link to avoid PK, OOC tirades including spam, bug exploitation, the annual jerk who tries to make the whole MUD (WANTED), that one jackass who serially follows heroes around and tries to take and sac their stuff, etc.

If there is enough cheating by seemingly unrelated parties, aimed at a particular goal, do you guys ever think, "Hmmm, maybe this is a tad too difficult if this many people will cheat to accomplish it."


The #2 motivator is ego. It's the same reason people cheat at pickup basketball by grabbing shirts, or why people on online games go bonkers if you beat them and screw up their 'rating'. They want to 'win' however they define winning, whether or not they're good enough to do it.

Multi-ing gear is an example here-- and a lot of gear movement is for fairly mundane stuff. Ditto people who try to arrange cabal inductions OOC, etc.

I think you're proposing the answers you want to hear, and not anything based on the experiences of the staff who handle these cases.

valguarnera@carrionfields.com

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy

HOT Locked TopicThe Party Analogy. [View all] , Valguarnera, Wed 01-Oct-08 07:46 AM
Reply Bumping an old-ass thread., Valguarnera, 24-Sep-08 07:57 PM, #70
Reply Okay this was just funny (to me), Bajula, 26-Sep-08 11:16 AM, #20
Reply While I'm generally ok, Dwoggurd, 26-Sep-08 01:13 PM, #21
Reply RE: While I'm generally ok, Bajula, 26-Sep-08 05:20 PM, #22
Reply RE: While I'm generally ok, Isildur, 26-Sep-08 05:33 PM, #23
Reply This analogy has flaws, Dwoggurd, 26-Sep-08 06:19 PM, #24
Reply RE: This analogy has flaws, Isildur, 26-Sep-08 06:30 PM, #25
Reply Re, Dwoggurd, 26-Sep-08 06:42 PM, #26
     Reply RE: Re, Isildur, 26-Sep-08 08:47 PM, #27
     Reply Thanks for dropping by! n/t, Stunna, 27-Sep-08 12:59 PM, #31
     Reply RE: Re, Daevryn, 27-Sep-08 02:51 PM, #32
          Reply RE: Re, Xanthrailles, 27-Sep-08 02:55 PM, #33
          Reply Heh Heh. Good one. n/t, Stunna, 27-Sep-08 04:21 PM, #34
          Reply RE: Testing., Valguarnera, 27-Sep-08 05:58 PM, #35
               Reply Heh Heh. Good one. n/t, Stunna, 27-Sep-08 10:09 PM, #37
Reply RE: This analogy has flaws, Bajula, 27-Sep-08 03:24 AM, #28
Reply This situation has flaws., Lyristeon, 27-Sep-08 07:17 PM, #36
     Reply I don't understand, Dwoggurd, 27-Sep-08 10:11 PM, #38
     Reply I don't understand why this is being argued., Java, 27-Sep-08 11:09 PM, #40
     Reply I think because there is no party without us., TheLastMohican, 28-Sep-08 02:06 PM, #48
          Reply Umm.. yeah. Thus proving the party analogy once again. ..., Java, 28-Sep-08 02:38 PM, #49
     Reply RE: I don't understand, Isildur, 27-Sep-08 11:10 PM, #41
          Reply So, Dwoggurd, 27-Sep-08 11:56 PM, #42
               Reply RE: So, Isildur, 28-Sep-08 12:20 AM, #43
                    Reply Re, Dwoggurd, 28-Sep-08 12:48 AM, #44
                         Reply RE: Re, Isildur, 28-Sep-08 09:14 AM, #45
                              Reply Isildur is nailing it on the head., Lyristeon, 28-Sep-08 09:27 AM, #46
                                   Reply I dig the party analogy; although, it does have players..., Boon, 30-Sep-08 01:21 AM, #62
                                        Reply RE: I dig the party analogy; although, it does have pla..., Java, 30-Sep-08 08:25 AM, #65
                                        Reply RE: I dig the party analogy; although, it does have pla..., Lyristeon, 30-Sep-08 04:57 PM, #69
     Reply You can't have a party without guests, chief. n/t, Stunna, 27-Sep-08 10:14 PM, #39
          Reply I can accept that., Lyristeon, 28-Sep-08 09:33 AM, #47
               Reply HOLY analOGY, BATMAN!!, Mekantos, 28-Sep-08 04:04 PM, #51
Reply There are significant differences to any common party, Kanjiro, 27-Sep-08 09:12 AM, #29
Reply You just don't get it..., Zulghinlour, 28-Sep-08 02:55 PM, #50
     Reply Question, Mekantos, 28-Sep-08 04:11 PM, #52
          Reply RE: Question, Zulghinlour, 28-Sep-08 05:29 PM, #53
          Reply RE: Question, Daevryn, 28-Sep-08 06:48 PM, #54
          Reply Lol go for it! -nt-, Mekantos, 28-Sep-08 11:24 PM, #56
          Reply RE: Question, Isildur, 28-Sep-08 08:55 PM, #55
          Reply Screwing over other players first, sloth second., Valguarnera, 29-Sep-08 08:39 PM #57
               Reply Ego vs hassle, Dwoggurd, 29-Sep-08 09:19 PM, #58
               Reply Typically, Daevryn, 29-Sep-08 09:43 PM, #59
               Reply I grant you my permission, Dwoggurd, 29-Sep-08 11:17 PM, #60
               Reply Sadly...., Torak, 30-Sep-08 02:20 AM, #63
                    Reply RE: Sadly...., Daevryn, 30-Sep-08 09:41 AM, #66
                         Reply Well..., Torak, 30-Sep-08 11:12 AM, #67
                              Reply He does have a site.., Elerosse, 30-Sep-08 11:30 AM, #68
               Reply Easy there lockjaw, Mekantos, 30-Sep-08 01:20 AM, #61
               Reply The sporting analogy is debatable, incognito, 30-Sep-08 02:51 AM, #64
Reply Did my thread get deleted?, Eskelian, 02-Oct-08 07:56 AM, #71
Reply Heh., Rooqweaz, 03-Oct-03 07:06 AM, #18
Reply RE: Heh., Rogardian, 03-Oct-03 08:44 AM, #1
Reply Maybe it's the drugs., Jhyrbian, 03-Oct-03 08:51 AM, #2
     Reply P.S, Jhyrbian, 03-Oct-03 08:52 AM, #3
Reply Tell you what: (quasi-tongue in cheek), nepenthe, 03-Oct-03 09:53 AM, #5
Reply the country isn't even a democracy, incognito, 03-Oct-03 01:10 PM, #10
Reply I disagree, Yanoreth, 03-Oct-03 10:05 AM, #6
Reply That was a waste of your time Yanoreth...Roq's, Xaannix, 05-Oct-03 01:33 AM, #19
Reply RE: Heh., Valguarnera, 03-Oct-03 11:57 AM, #8
Reply One remark, Rooqweaz, 04-Oct-03 07:06 AM, #11
     Reply Are you..., Zepachu, 04-Oct-03 10:24 AM, #12
     Reply I can quit any time I want!, Quislet, 06-Oct-03 09:17 AM, #15
     Reply Heh, this reminds me of the old " *addict* " social. -n..., Kanjiro, 27-Sep-08 08:48 AM, #30
     Reply Re: Accountability., Valguarnera, 04-Oct-03 12:30 PM, #13
Reply Better yet, think of a football game., Stunna, 03-Oct-03 12:42 PM, #9
Reply I agree with Zulg on his post and, Xaannix, 05-Oct-03 01:29 AM, #14
Reply CF isn't a government, Zulghinlour, 03-Oct-03 12:44 PM, #17
Reply What do imm's owe us?, kellog (Anonymous), 06-Oct-03 02:46 PM, #16
Reply As I started the thread in question...., Laearrist, 03-Oct-03 10:49 AM, #7
Reply Amen (n/t), Yanoreth, 03-Oct-03 09:53 AM, #4
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #34742 Previous topic | Next topic