Subject: "RE: So" This topic is locked.
Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #34742
Show all folders

IsildurSun 28-Sep-08 12:20 AM
Member since 04th Mar 2003
5969 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#34786, "RE: So"


          

>They contribute but have no rights. So if you throw them away,
>they may be disappointed.

If they're "thrown away", odds are the staff doesn't want them to come back anyway. So there's no issue there.

>Some of them may contribute for many
>years. They part this project, not just
>as random guests, but let's say, if you prefer a party
>analogy, as core guests.

Seniority doesn't confer special rights. You puke on the couch, you get thrown out of my party. I don't care whether you've been coming to my parties for years. Maybe if you've always been a good guest in the past, I let you come to the next one. But when you demonstrate on a regular basis that you can't hold your liquor and are the sort of person who's likely to ruin my furniture, I stop inviting you altogether.

>They also sometimes contribute as staff (but not gain any
>staff rights). For example, if you find a bug and describe it,
>you've contributed to the project in a way the staff should
>do.

I report bugs for my own benefit because I dislike playing a buggy game.

I run cabals (on occasion) because it's in keeping with my character's role-play, and because there are concrete in-game advantages.

>And they do that for free. Don't confuse it with the job staff
>does. While imms also do great job, they don't actually do
>that for "free". They aren't paid in money, but they are
>"paid" through different means.

Dude. What the staff does *so* doesn't compare to what a player does. Even if they're just sitting in the Gathering Room doing nothing, that means they're *not playing a mortal and doing fun stuff like killing people*. All that so they can answer people's assy prayers and empower people just to see them delete the next day.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy

HOT Locked TopicThe Party Analogy. [View all] , Valguarnera, Wed 01-Oct-08 07:46 AM
Reply Bumping an old-ass thread., Valguarnera, 24-Sep-08 07:57 PM, #70
Reply Okay this was just funny (to me), Bajula, 26-Sep-08 11:16 AM, #20
Reply While I'm generally ok, Dwoggurd, 26-Sep-08 01:13 PM, #21
Reply RE: While I'm generally ok, Bajula, 26-Sep-08 05:20 PM, #22
Reply RE: While I'm generally ok, Isildur, 26-Sep-08 05:33 PM, #23
Reply This analogy has flaws, Dwoggurd, 26-Sep-08 06:19 PM, #24
Reply RE: This analogy has flaws, Isildur, 26-Sep-08 06:30 PM, #25
Reply Re, Dwoggurd, 26-Sep-08 06:42 PM, #26
     Reply RE: Re, Isildur, 26-Sep-08 08:47 PM, #27
     Reply Thanks for dropping by! n/t, Stunna, 27-Sep-08 12:59 PM, #31
     Reply RE: Re, Daevryn, 27-Sep-08 02:51 PM, #32
          Reply RE: Re, Xanthrailles, 27-Sep-08 02:55 PM, #33
          Reply Heh Heh. Good one. n/t, Stunna, 27-Sep-08 04:21 PM, #34
          Reply RE: Testing., Valguarnera, 27-Sep-08 05:58 PM, #35
               Reply Heh Heh. Good one. n/t, Stunna, 27-Sep-08 10:09 PM, #37
Reply RE: This analogy has flaws, Bajula, 27-Sep-08 03:24 AM, #28
Reply This situation has flaws., Lyristeon, 27-Sep-08 07:17 PM, #36
     Reply I don't understand, Dwoggurd, 27-Sep-08 10:11 PM, #38
     Reply I don't understand why this is being argued., Java, 27-Sep-08 11:09 PM, #40
     Reply I think because there is no party without us., TheLastMohican, 28-Sep-08 02:06 PM, #48
          Reply Umm.. yeah. Thus proving the party analogy once again. ..., Java, 28-Sep-08 02:38 PM, #49
     Reply RE: I don't understand, Isildur, 27-Sep-08 11:10 PM, #41
          Reply So, Dwoggurd, 27-Sep-08 11:56 PM, #42
               Reply RE: So, Isildur, 28-Sep-08 12:20 AM #43
                    Reply Re, Dwoggurd, 28-Sep-08 12:48 AM, #44
                         Reply RE: Re, Isildur, 28-Sep-08 09:14 AM, #45
                              Reply Isildur is nailing it on the head., Lyristeon, 28-Sep-08 09:27 AM, #46
                                   Reply I dig the party analogy; although, it does have players..., Boon, 30-Sep-08 01:21 AM, #62
                                        Reply RE: I dig the party analogy; although, it does have pla..., Java, 30-Sep-08 08:25 AM, #65
                                        Reply RE: I dig the party analogy; although, it does have pla..., Lyristeon, 30-Sep-08 04:57 PM, #69
     Reply You can't have a party without guests, chief. n/t, Stunna, 27-Sep-08 10:14 PM, #39
          Reply I can accept that., Lyristeon, 28-Sep-08 09:33 AM, #47
               Reply HOLY analOGY, BATMAN!!, Mekantos, 28-Sep-08 04:04 PM, #51
Reply There are significant differences to any common party, Kanjiro, 27-Sep-08 09:12 AM, #29
Reply You just don't get it..., Zulghinlour, 28-Sep-08 02:55 PM, #50
     Reply Question, Mekantos, 28-Sep-08 04:11 PM, #52
          Reply RE: Question, Zulghinlour, 28-Sep-08 05:29 PM, #53
          Reply RE: Question, Daevryn, 28-Sep-08 06:48 PM, #54
          Reply Lol go for it! -nt-, Mekantos, 28-Sep-08 11:24 PM, #56
          Reply RE: Question, Isildur, 28-Sep-08 08:55 PM, #55
          Reply Screwing over other players first, sloth second., Valguarnera, 29-Sep-08 08:39 PM, #57
               Reply Ego vs hassle, Dwoggurd, 29-Sep-08 09:19 PM, #58
               Reply Typically, Daevryn, 29-Sep-08 09:43 PM, #59
               Reply I grant you my permission, Dwoggurd, 29-Sep-08 11:17 PM, #60
               Reply Sadly...., Torak, 30-Sep-08 02:20 AM, #63
                    Reply RE: Sadly...., Daevryn, 30-Sep-08 09:41 AM, #66
                         Reply Well..., Torak, 30-Sep-08 11:12 AM, #67
                              Reply He does have a site.., Elerosse, 30-Sep-08 11:30 AM, #68
               Reply Easy there lockjaw, Mekantos, 30-Sep-08 01:20 AM, #61
               Reply The sporting analogy is debatable, incognito, 30-Sep-08 02:51 AM, #64
Reply Did my thread get deleted?, Eskelian, 02-Oct-08 07:56 AM, #71
Reply Heh., Rooqweaz, 03-Oct-03 07:06 AM, #18
Reply RE: Heh., Rogardian, 03-Oct-03 08:44 AM, #1
Reply Maybe it's the drugs., Jhyrbian, 03-Oct-03 08:51 AM, #2
     Reply P.S, Jhyrbian, 03-Oct-03 08:52 AM, #3
Reply Tell you what: (quasi-tongue in cheek), nepenthe, 03-Oct-03 09:53 AM, #5
Reply the country isn't even a democracy, incognito, 03-Oct-03 01:10 PM, #10
Reply I disagree, Yanoreth, 03-Oct-03 10:05 AM, #6
Reply That was a waste of your time Yanoreth...Roq's, Xaannix, 05-Oct-03 01:33 AM, #19
Reply RE: Heh., Valguarnera, 03-Oct-03 11:57 AM, #8
Reply One remark, Rooqweaz, 04-Oct-03 07:06 AM, #11
     Reply Are you..., Zepachu, 04-Oct-03 10:24 AM, #12
     Reply I can quit any time I want!, Quislet, 06-Oct-03 09:17 AM, #15
     Reply Heh, this reminds me of the old " *addict* " social. -n..., Kanjiro, 27-Sep-08 08:48 AM, #30
     Reply Re: Accountability., Valguarnera, 04-Oct-03 12:30 PM, #13
Reply Better yet, think of a football game., Stunna, 03-Oct-03 12:42 PM, #9
Reply I agree with Zulg on his post and, Xaannix, 05-Oct-03 01:29 AM, #14
Reply CF isn't a government, Zulghinlour, 03-Oct-03 12:44 PM, #17
Reply What do imm's owe us?, kellog (Anonymous), 06-Oct-03 02:46 PM, #16
Reply As I started the thread in question...., Laearrist, 03-Oct-03 10:49 AM, #7
Reply Amen (n/t), Yanoreth, 03-Oct-03 09:53 AM, #4
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #34742 Previous topic | Next topic