Zulghinlour | Sun 28-Sep-08 02:55 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
9792 posts
| |
|
#34797, "You just don't get it..."
|
I think the party analogy works perfectly, and you just can't seem to get it. If I throw a party, I'm providing the location & some basic ground rules (stay out of my sisters bedroom, don't touch my parents liquor cabinet, etc). I invite a bunch of guests over. The combination of my location, my groundrules, and the guests make a party.
Me offering my house = The Immortals, the Game and the Rules Guests = The Players
You need both to have a successful party (and in our case a successful game). Nobody is arguing that but you, because we all know that it takes both of us for this to be successful.
If my guests start breaking my rules (like breaking into my parents liquor cabinet) you sure as #### I'm kicking them out of the party, even if they are my best friend on the whole world, because it's going to be my ass that gets busted by my parents.
If players start breaking rules (and consistently, repeatedly break rules), they are getting the boot. Period. So long, and thanks for all the fish!
|
|
|
The Party Analogy.
[View all] , Valguarnera, Wed 01-Oct-08 07:46 AM
Bumping an old-ass thread.,
Valguarnera,
24-Sep-08 07:57 PM, #70
Okay this was just funny (to me),
Bajula,
26-Sep-08 11:16 AM, #20
While I'm generally ok,
Dwoggurd,
26-Sep-08 01:13 PM, #21
RE: While I'm generally ok,
Bajula,
26-Sep-08 05:20 PM, #22
RE: While I'm generally ok,
Isildur,
26-Sep-08 05:33 PM, #23
This analogy has flaws,
Dwoggurd,
26-Sep-08 06:19 PM, #24
RE: This analogy has flaws,
Isildur,
26-Sep-08 06:30 PM, #25
Re,
Dwoggurd,
26-Sep-08 06:42 PM, #26
RE: Re,
Isildur,
26-Sep-08 08:47 PM, #27
Thanks for dropping by! n/t,
Stunna,
27-Sep-08 12:59 PM, #31
RE: Re,
Daevryn,
27-Sep-08 02:51 PM, #32
RE: Re,
Xanthrailles,
27-Sep-08 02:55 PM, #33
Heh Heh. Good one. n/t,
Stunna,
27-Sep-08 04:21 PM, #34
RE: Testing.,
Valguarnera,
27-Sep-08 05:58 PM, #35
Heh Heh. Good one. n/t,
Stunna,
27-Sep-08 10:09 PM, #37
RE: This analogy has flaws,
Bajula,
27-Sep-08 03:24 AM, #28
This situation has flaws.,
Lyristeon,
27-Sep-08 07:17 PM, #36
I don't understand,
Dwoggurd,
27-Sep-08 10:11 PM, #38
I don't understand why this is being argued.,
Java,
27-Sep-08 11:09 PM, #40
I think because there is no party without us.,
TheLastMohican,
28-Sep-08 02:06 PM, #48
Umm.. yeah. Thus proving the party analogy once again. ...,
Java,
28-Sep-08 02:38 PM, #49
RE: I don't understand,
Isildur,
27-Sep-08 11:10 PM, #41
So,
Dwoggurd,
27-Sep-08 11:56 PM, #42
RE: So,
Isildur,
28-Sep-08 12:20 AM, #43
Re,
Dwoggurd,
28-Sep-08 12:48 AM, #44
RE: Re,
Isildur,
28-Sep-08 09:14 AM, #45
Isildur is nailing it on the head.,
Lyristeon,
28-Sep-08 09:27 AM, #46
I dig the party analogy; although, it does have players...,
Boon,
30-Sep-08 01:21 AM, #62
RE: I dig the party analogy; although, it does have pla...,
Java,
30-Sep-08 08:25 AM, #65
RE: I dig the party analogy; although, it does have pla...,
Lyristeon,
30-Sep-08 04:57 PM, #69
You can't have a party without guests, chief. n/t,
Stunna,
27-Sep-08 10:14 PM, #39
I can accept that.,
Lyristeon,
28-Sep-08 09:33 AM, #47
HOLY analOGY, BATMAN!!,
Mekantos,
28-Sep-08 04:04 PM, #51
There are significant differences to any common party,
Kanjiro,
27-Sep-08 09:12 AM, #29
You just don't get it...,
Zulghinlour,
28-Sep-08 02:55 PM #50
Question,
Mekantos,
28-Sep-08 04:11 PM, #52
RE: Question,
Zulghinlour,
28-Sep-08 05:29 PM, #53
RE: Question,
Daevryn,
28-Sep-08 06:48 PM, #54
Lol go for it! -nt-,
Mekantos,
28-Sep-08 11:24 PM, #56
RE: Question,
Isildur,
28-Sep-08 08:55 PM, #55
Screwing over other players first, sloth second.,
Valguarnera,
29-Sep-08 08:39 PM, #57
Ego vs hassle,
Dwoggurd,
29-Sep-08 09:19 PM, #58
Typically,
Daevryn,
29-Sep-08 09:43 PM, #59
I grant you my permission,
Dwoggurd,
29-Sep-08 11:17 PM, #60
Sadly....,
Torak,
30-Sep-08 02:20 AM, #63
RE: Sadly....,
Daevryn,
30-Sep-08 09:41 AM, #66
Well...,
Torak,
30-Sep-08 11:12 AM, #67
He does have a site..,
Elerosse,
30-Sep-08 11:30 AM, #68
Easy there lockjaw,
Mekantos,
30-Sep-08 01:20 AM, #61
The sporting analogy is debatable,
incognito,
30-Sep-08 02:51 AM, #64
Did my thread get deleted?,
Eskelian,
02-Oct-08 07:56 AM, #71
Heh.,
Rooqweaz,
03-Oct-03 07:06 AM, #18
RE: Heh.,
Rogardian,
03-Oct-03 08:44 AM, #1
Maybe it's the drugs.,
Jhyrbian,
03-Oct-03 08:51 AM, #2
P.S,
Jhyrbian,
03-Oct-03 08:52 AM, #3
Tell you what: (quasi-tongue in cheek),
nepenthe,
03-Oct-03 09:53 AM, #5
the country isn't even a democracy,
incognito,
03-Oct-03 01:10 PM, #10
I disagree,
Yanoreth,
03-Oct-03 10:05 AM, #6
That was a waste of your time Yanoreth...Roq's,
Xaannix,
05-Oct-03 01:33 AM, #19
RE: Heh.,
Valguarnera,
03-Oct-03 11:57 AM, #8
One remark,
Rooqweaz,
04-Oct-03 07:06 AM, #11
Are you...,
Zepachu,
04-Oct-03 10:24 AM, #12
I can quit any time I want!,
Quislet,
06-Oct-03 09:17 AM, #15
Heh, this reminds me of the old " *addict* " social. -n...,
Kanjiro,
27-Sep-08 08:48 AM, #30
Re: Accountability.,
Valguarnera,
04-Oct-03 12:30 PM, #13
Better yet, think of a football game.,
Stunna,
03-Oct-03 12:42 PM, #9
I agree with Zulg on his post and,
Xaannix,
05-Oct-03 01:29 AM, #14
CF isn't a government,
Zulghinlour,
03-Oct-03 12:44 PM, #17
What do imm's owe us?,
kellog (Anonymous),
06-Oct-03 02:46 PM, #16
As I started the thread in question....,
Laearrist,
03-Oct-03 10:49 AM, #7
Amen (n/t),
Yanoreth,
03-Oct-03 09:53 AM, #4
| |
|