Subject: "RE: Isn't this just a TAD overpowered? (Read)" Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #2340
Show all folders

BeastMon 22-Sep-03 11:04 AM
Member since 04th Jul 2003
34 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#2348, "RE: Isn't this just a TAD overpowered? (Read)"


  

          

Alright, give wand users bashing. And give warriors aura/barrier/shield/wither/crushinghand....oh wait, let's not spread the ability among the classes - it'll water it down. That has gotta be the dumbest reason I've ever heard. Give mages a fighting chance? What, necromancers, invokers, anti-paladins, transmuters are all at the bottom of the food chain? They just suck? What was frosted on your flakes this morning, crack?

Beast

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

TopicIsn't this just a TAD overpowered? (Read) [View all] , Beast, Mon 22-Sep-03 03:36 AM
Reply RE: Isn't this just a TAD overpowered? (Read), Valguarnera, 22-Sep-03 12:14 PM, #11
Reply random thoughts, incognito, 22-Sep-03 12:12 PM, #10
Reply Or..., Shadowmaster, 22-Sep-03 11:30 AM, #9
Reply RE: Isn't this just a TAD overpowered? (Read), nepenthe, 22-Sep-03 10:50 AM, #3
Reply RE: Isn't this just a TAD overpowered? (Read), Beast, 22-Sep-03 11:02 AM, #5
     Reply RE: Isn't this just a TAD overpowered? (Read), nepenthe, 22-Sep-03 11:17 AM, #7
Reply RE: Isn't this just a TAD overpowered? (Read), fleshofchaos, 22-Sep-03 07:15 AM, #2
Reply RE: Isn't this just a TAD overpowered? (Read), Beast, 22-Sep-03 11:04 AM #6
     Reply RE: Isn't this just a TAD overpowered? (Read), fleshofchaos, 22-Sep-03 11:17 AM, #8
Reply RE: Isn't this just a TAD overpowered? (Read), Circuits Edge (Anonymous), 22-Sep-03 04:20 AM, #1
     Reply RE: Isn't this just a TAD overpowered? (Read), Beast, 22-Sep-03 11:00 AM, #4
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #2340 Previous topic | Next topic