Subject: "Continued" Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #19760
Show all folders

elmeri_Tue 27-Nov-07 10:06 AM
Member since 13th Dec 2004
252 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#19819, "Continued"


          

Ok then, now that I have established that I really dislike how raiding undefended cabals is encouraged, I will explain the benefits of changing this.

- Less pendulum, if you log on alone, it's nice to have your item
- No need for mid-low level characters to endlessly retrieve while a
huge enemy hero group just rolls over the inner in 2 rounds. It gets
old really quick.
- Risk taking encouraged more (awesome!!)

So, what would I wish to see done? I previously mentioned that small boons (like minor imm exp gains, whatever), or at least positive acknowledgment of characters who take the raid where it's rough. Also, cut slack in the why aren't all the cabals raided already department (also Empire).

Other hardcoded changes could also be made. Specifically in cabal guardian mechanics. Right now, cabal guardians are fairly weak in the hp department, and geared to have a high damage output. They are kind of like an extra boost in damage output. What I would like to see happen, is make their offense weaker, defense higher. Destructor's flurry will rip apart most level 30-40s. Nova from archmage. Divine retribution could outright kill a level 40 duergar, if he does not have lots of preps. So, what you would see is cabal inners with mayby half or even 30% the damage output, double the hp. The skills they would use, would be tactical advantages designed to help a defender. Blindness, dirt kick, eyejab, rescue (perhaps some form of distract or whatever mongoose or dillo has), dispel, various lagging skills etc. etc, basicly anything that makes it easier for the defenders to fight, instead of just lowering the attackers hp by a set amount.

Benefits of this would be to allow lower level raiders to actually participate in taking the item, since they would not be torn apart by the inner. Ofcourse it would take level 35 character longer than a level 51 to kill the inner, but it would still be conceivable, even with defenders involved. It would also imo make taking on large raids easier, things like 5 on 2 raids usually turn into a huge cluster#### really quick, since by the time defenders have prepped and get there, the inner is writhing and unless the defenders are already grouped and at 100% hp, it turns into two quick 5 on 1 spankdowns. After the change, perhaps people would get blinded to make directing harder, the inner might intercept/rescue and ease off the damage the defenders are taking, and in general give the defender more leeway to use tactics against the raiders, but without outright beefing the inner into some super monster of certain death.

This same could be applied to outer guards. They should do more tactical skills like lag, dirt kick etc., and less straight up melee damage. Face it, the outer's melee damage is what kills any possibilites to retrieve for low level characters. To make it a more viable feat for even characters in their teens, also make the out guards tank worse. I am kind of torn on whether it is a good idea, but outer guards could also have damage reduction that goes up based on level. Level 20 people would see 20% reduction, and heroes would see 51%.

As an additional thing for inners, perhaps give them prog more firepower when there is no one who can defend against the raider. Ghosts would have to count here. If there is no one in the range of the raider in question, the inner will be progging nasty stuff, making it a bitch to kill. This would take care of lame tactics, like sending the unopposed level 37 dude to grind down the inner, just to force the solo hero to try and retrieve from 5 enemies. And to cut down the keen interest in taking items from undefended cabals.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

HOT TopicCabals [View all] , Daevryn, Sun 25-Nov-07 09:10 PM
Reply RE: Cabals, Eskelian, 03-Dec-07 02:49 AM, #100
Reply My thoughts..., trewyn, 27-Nov-07 11:03 PM, #72
Reply I agree that getting inducted should not be time consum..., elmeri_, 28-Nov-07 09:33 AM, #77
Reply RE: Cabals, Doge, 27-Nov-07 12:31 PM, #60
Reply Changes to cabal raiding I would like to see, elmeri_, 27-Nov-07 06:54 AM, #56
Reply Continued, elmeri_, 27-Nov-07 10:06 AM #59
     Reply I think this might have some merit, and is certainly ea..., Quixotic, 27-Nov-07 01:14 PM, #62
     Reply RE: Continued, _Magus_, 27-Nov-07 02:58 PM, #63
          Reply RE: Continued, Tac, 27-Nov-07 03:52 PM, #64
          Reply RE: Continued, Daevryn, 27-Nov-07 04:13 PM, #66
               Reply That's just the thing., elmeri_, 27-Nov-07 05:06 PM, #67
               Reply RE: That's just the thing., Daevryn, 27-Nov-07 05:14 PM, #68
                    Reply I'm not talking about scaled effects though, elmeri_, 27-Nov-07 07:09 PM, #69
                         Reply It's just... too complicated., Terwin05, 27-Nov-07 08:39 PM, #70
                              Reply Well, just ditch whatever I said about raiding empty ca..., elmeri_, 28-Nov-07 03:54 AM, #76
               Reply Show me your log of you solo'ing the Scion Archmage ple..., trewyn, 27-Nov-07 10:52 PM, #71
               Reply I was able to solo the Archmage rather easily..., _Magus_, 28-Nov-07 03:02 AM, #74
               Reply I've got to ask then...., Tac, 28-Nov-07 09:47 AM, #78
               Reply RE: I've got to ask then...., Daevryn, 28-Nov-07 10:20 AM, #79
                    Reply RE: I've got to ask then...., Tac, 28-Nov-07 10:53 AM, #80
                    Reply RE: I've got to ask then...., Daevryn, 28-Nov-07 02:01 PM, #87
                    Reply RE: I've got to ask then...., Tac, 28-Nov-07 02:49 PM, #91
                         Reply RE: I've got to ask then...., Daevryn, 28-Nov-07 03:35 PM, #96
                    Reply Not to get off on too much of a tangent, _Magus_, 28-Nov-07 02:20 PM, #88
                    Reply RE: Not to get off on too much of a tangent, Daevryn, 28-Nov-07 02:22 PM, #89
                    Reply Builds that will destroy inners., elmeri_, 28-Nov-07 02:49 PM, #90
                    Reply Ok, help. What am I missing?, Adhelard, 28-Nov-07 12:50 PM, #81
                         Reply try a ranger if you want real humility in raiding, Trouble, 28-Nov-07 01:13 PM, #82
                         Reply RE: try a ranger if you want real humility in raiding, Daevryn, 28-Nov-07 01:21 PM, #84
                         Reply RE: try a ranger if you want real humility in raiding, Adhelard, 28-Nov-07 03:05 PM, #93
                              Reply RE: try a ranger if you want real humility in raiding, Daevryn, 28-Nov-07 03:26 PM, #95
                         Reply RE: Ok, help. What am I missing?, Daevryn, 28-Nov-07 01:18 PM, #83
                              Reply RE: Ok, help. What am I missing?, Adhelard, 28-Nov-07 03:03 PM, #92
                                   Reply RE: Ok, help. What am I missing?, Daevryn, 28-Nov-07 03:23 PM, #94
                                        Reply Ok, thanks., Adhelard, 29-Nov-07 06:23 PM, #98
               Reply RE: Continued, TJHuron, 30-Nov-07 12:55 AM, #99
          Reply They would not be able to slay it at will, elmeri_, 27-Nov-07 04:06 PM, #65
Reply Generalizing the problem, Terwin05, 26-Nov-07 02:09 PM, #42
Reply RE: Generalizing the problem, Dervish, 26-Nov-07 02:16 PM, #45
Reply RE: Outposts, DurNominator, 26-Nov-07 03:58 PM, #49
Reply I like Magus and Boon's combined Ideas., Dragomir, 26-Nov-07 01:45 PM, #38
Reply RE: I like Magus and Boon's combined Ideas., _Magus_, 26-Nov-07 02:04 PM, #41
Reply RE: Cabals, Twist, 26-Nov-07 11:21 AM, #22
Reply Another cause is pb caution, Theerkla, 26-Nov-07 11:31 AM, #23
Reply RE: Another cause is pb caution, Daevryn, 26-Nov-07 11:40 AM, #24
     Reply RE: Another cause is pb caution, Torak, 26-Nov-07 01:05 PM, #30
Reply RE: Cabals, Daevryn, 26-Nov-07 12:01 PM, #25
Reply Well there you go..., Tac, 26-Nov-07 12:31 PM, #26
     Reply RE: Well there you go..., Daevryn, 26-Nov-07 12:41 PM, #27
     Reply You aren't the only one..., Tac, 26-Nov-07 12:57 PM, #28
     Reply RE: You aren't the only one..., Daevryn, 26-Nov-07 01:12 PM, #33
     Reply Almost been there, done that.., Trouble, 26-Nov-07 01:04 PM, #31
     Reply RE: Almost been there, done that.., Daevryn, 26-Nov-07 01:10 PM, #32
          Reply Hmm, wonder where I got that from., Trouble, 26-Nov-07 01:30 PM, #35
               Reply RE: Hmm, wonder where I got that from., Daevryn, 26-Nov-07 01:43 PM, #37
                    Reply Heh, you missed the important part..., Tac, 26-Nov-07 02:11 PM, #44
                         Reply How about more rewarding in general? -nt-, Mekantos, 26-Nov-07 04:08 PM, #51
                              Reply I think there's been less rewarding since the installme..., _Magus_, 28-Nov-07 03:35 AM, #75
     Reply Nope!!, trewyn, 27-Nov-07 11:36 PM, #73
     Reply Dont do it please and here is why, Dervish, 26-Nov-07 01:01 PM, #29
Reply Glass Houses + Brick = goofy idea on retrieval, UncleArzzra, 26-Nov-07 01:52 PM, #39
Reply RE: Cabals, Kalageadon, 28-Nov-07 05:15 PM, #97
Reply RE: Cabals, Chalupah, 12-Dec-07 04:16 PM, #102
Reply RE: Cabals, incognito, 26-Nov-07 03:48 AM, #15
Reply I concur, ORB, 26-Nov-07 04:42 AM, #16
Reply I may be mistaken but, Dervish, 26-Nov-07 05:21 AM, #17
Reply I'm talking most people in the cabal by lvl 15. not an ..., ORB, 27-Nov-07 08:31 AM, #57
Reply RE: Getting back to the good ole' days:, _Magus_, 26-Nov-07 08:17 PM, #55
Reply Eh:, Daevryn, 26-Nov-07 08:58 AM, #19
     Reply RE: Eh:, Dervish, 26-Nov-07 09:38 AM, #20
     Reply The Five Magics, Twist, 26-Nov-07 11:00 AM, #21
          Reply Nice story..., Dervish, 26-Nov-07 01:13 PM, #34
          Reply RE: Nice story..., Twist, 26-Nov-07 03:38 PM, #48
          Reply The *real* Five Magics, Trouble, 26-Nov-07 01:42 PM, #36
               Reply You were in charge of both..., Twist, 26-Nov-07 03:34 PM, #47
                    Reply Only if you use the phrase 'in charge' loosely., Trouble, 28-Nov-07 01:40 PM, #85
                         Reply Poofin..., Twist, 28-Nov-07 01:46 PM, #86
     Reply RE: Eh:, incognito, 26-Nov-07 02:38 PM, #46
Reply Some ideas for you, Mekantos, 26-Nov-07 01:39 AM, #13
Reply Is there any love for this idea? If yes, I will build o..., Mekantos, 26-Nov-07 04:03 PM, #50
     Reply I don't speak for everyone, but..., Twist, 27-Nov-07 09:06 AM, #58
Reply Suggestions, Torak, 25-Nov-07 11:24 PM, #9
Reply a few points and ideas, Quixotic, 25-Nov-07 10:43 PM, #6
Reply RE: a few points and ideas, Daevryn, 25-Nov-07 10:55 PM, #7
     Reply True., Quixotic, 25-Nov-07 11:05 PM, #8
Reply Two answers:, UncleArzzra, 25-Nov-07 10:25 PM, #4
Reply Re: Cabal Reputation, _Magus_, 25-Nov-07 10:32 PM, #5
Reply RE: Cabals, _Magus_, 25-Nov-07 09:52 PM, #1
     Reply RE: Cabals, Boon, 25-Nov-07 10:32 PM, #2
     Reply Cool. Thanks for expounding on the idea. ~, _Magus_, 25-Nov-07 10:16 PM, #3
     Reply Your idea deserves merit at the least., Derexal, 25-Nov-07 11:26 PM, #10
     Reply RE: Your idea deserves merit at the least., _Magus_, 26-Nov-07 02:09 PM, #43
     Reply RE: Cabals, silencedstatik, 26-Nov-07 12:37 AM, #11
     Reply RE: Skill ideas?, _Magus_, 26-Nov-07 01:01 AM, #12
     Reply I dont like it., Dervish, 26-Nov-07 03:31 AM, #14
     Reply RE: I dont like it., Daevryn, 26-Nov-07 08:56 AM, #18
     Reply RE: I dont like it., Amaranthe, 27-Nov-07 12:32 PM, #61
     Reply RE: I dont like it., Lyristeon, 26-Nov-07 04:26 PM, #52
          Reply Hey, said "A" say "B"?, Dervish, 26-Nov-07 04:57 PM, #53
               Reply RE: Unique bonuses, _Magus_, 26-Nov-07 08:12 PM, #54
     Reply An added thought:, _Magus_, 26-Nov-07 01:59 PM, #40
     Reply I don't like this..., Eskelian, 03-Dec-07 03:03 AM, #101
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #19760 Previous topic | Next topic