|
Dwoggurd | Tue 20-Mar-07 03:35 AM |
Member since 20th Jan 2004
668 posts
|    |
|
#17174, "You may notice"
|
That not a single of your posts in this thread is constructive.
The problem is already complicated enough without your flames. Additional garbage is simply doesn't needed.
|
|
|
 How do you want wield to react?
[View all] , Zulghinlour, Wed 14-Mar-07 10:41 PM
  Dual wield helpfile looks outdated,
DurNominator,
21-Mar-07 06:46 AM, #31
Has this gone live?,
Tac,
20-Mar-07 08:13 AM, #24
  No, it has not.,
Zulghinlour,
20-Mar-07 10:39 AM, #25
FNCR,
Zulghinlour,
20-Mar-07 08:43 PM, #26
Cool thanks! nt,
Tac,
20-Mar-07 09:01 PM, #27
RE: FNCR,
Isildur,
20-Mar-07 11:52 PM, #29
Wield command ANSI standard,
Dwoggurd,
17-Mar-07 02:59 PM, #11
RE: Wield command ANSI standard,
Gabe,
19-Mar-07 10:13 AM, #12
Heh,
Dwoggurd,
19-Mar-07 12:15 PM, #13
RE: Heh,
Gabe,
19-Mar-07 12:20 PM, #14
Problem is,
Dwoggurd,
19-Mar-07 03:30 PM, #17
RE: Problem is,
Gabe,
19-Mar-07 08:43 PM, #19
You may notice,
Dwoggurd,
20-Mar-07 03:35 AM #22
RE: Heh,
Valguarnera ,
19-Mar-07 01:07 PM, #15
Actually,
Dwoggurd,
19-Mar-07 03:21 PM, #16
Some implementaion notes,
Dwoggurd,
19-Mar-07 03:39 PM, #18
Nice idea, however it needs one more additional command...,
DurNominator,
20-Mar-07 01:31 AM, #20
Answers,
Dwoggurd,
20-Mar-07 03:33 AM, #21
Clarification,
Dwoggurd,
20-Mar-07 04:26 AM, #23
RE: Clarification,
Zulghinlour,
20-Mar-07 09:35 PM, #28
Re,
Dwoggurd,
21-Mar-07 05:05 AM, #30
I would prefer,
Dwoggurd,
15-Mar-07 11:30 AM, #3
RE: I would prefer,
Zulghinlour,
15-Mar-07 05:08 PM, #4
Re,
Dwoggurd,
16-Mar-07 05:34 AM, #5
While a stochastic dual wield function would be fun,,
Marcus_,
16-Mar-07 07:19 AM, #6
RE: Re,
Isildur,
16-Mar-07 10:34 AM, #7
Say no to AI,
Dwoggurd,
16-Mar-07 11:51 AM, #8
RE: Say no to AI,
Isildur,
16-Mar-07 01:17 PM, #9
yes,
Dwoggurd,
16-Mar-07 01:42 PM, #10
RE: How do you want wield to react?,
Isildur,
14-Mar-07 11:56 PM, #1
I don't care either way,
Zulghinlour,
15-Mar-07 10:27 AM, #2
| |
|
