Tac | Wed 06-Sep-06 04:56 PM |
Member since 15th Nov 2005
2050 posts
| |
|
#202, "RE: devil's advocate question for the peanut gallery. txt"
|
>Let me suggest the following extremely generous >summary of what Odrirg posted: > >"Political correctness prevents government entities from >utilizing profiling techniques that would serve to reduce the >likelihood of future terrorist actions against the United >States."
I'd say this is a summary of a part of the essay.
>Now, for all those who dismissed Odrirg's post (myself >included): > >1. Are you against profiling?
No. I, infact think that profiling should be allowed. There would need to be a lot of oversight, however, because the line between profiling and racial discrimination is pretty slim. I also think that it is ridiculous for an 80 year old lady to be selected for random searches. If you are a young arabic man however, you should expect, and accept that you may face tougher scrutiny than the old lady. I could go on about my reasons here, but I don't have the time right now.
>2. If so, is it because you don't think it would be effective, >or because it's "wrong" regardless of how effective it may >be?
It *might* be effective... I don't think we should turn a blind eye to the problem. Some security measures are neccessary. The problem is that no security can be 100% effective (bet mouse trap etc.) so some risk has to be acceptable. I wish I had the time and desire to look up statistics, but I'd bet being injured (or worse) by a terrorist action (for an American) is right up there with getting struck by lightning, or eaten by a shark. Just above getting kill by a sting ray barb to the heart. It's an overblow issue. Step up security slightly to plug some of the obvious holes, then ignore it. Terrorism only works when it insights fear. So far 9/11 has been extraordinarily effective because people who (like me) have zero chance of ever even seeing a terrorist are afraid of terrorism (unlike me).
|
|
|
Obligatory. Politics. Discuss. n/t
[View all] , Eskelian, Thu 31-Aug-06 02:30 AM
Thread locked on account of sprawl.,
Valguarnera,
13-Sep-06 09:12 AM, #123
This essey pretty much sums up my current world view.,
Odrirg,
03-Sep-06 01:27 AM, #16
RE: Vitriol:,
Valguarnera,
05-Sep-06 03:26 PM, #17
RE: Vitriol:,
DurNominator,
05-Sep-06 04:06 PM, #19
Wow... just wow....,
Tac,
05-Sep-06 03:57 PM, #18
RE: Wow... just wow....,
Valguarnera,
05-Sep-06 04:32 PM, #20
Heh...,
Tac,
05-Sep-06 04:37 PM, #21
This is a Fallacious argument.,
(NOT Pro),
06-Sep-06 06:25 PM, #30
RE: "Mexican invasion",
Valguarnera,
07-Sep-06 02:58 PM, #47
Why won't they legalize it?,
Tac,
07-Sep-06 03:02 PM, #48
My take:,
Valguarnera,
07-Sep-06 03:18 PM, #49
RE: Why won't they legalize it?,
nepenthe,
07-Sep-06 03:27 PM, #50
RE: Why won't they legalize it?,
Eskelian,
07-Sep-06 10:24 PM, #77
RE: Why won't they legalize it?,
Eskelian,
07-Sep-06 10:33 PM, #78
We'll probably have to kill them all. nt,
Aodh,
08-Sep-06 12:26 AM, #80
RE: Why won't they legalize it?,
Isildur,
07-Sep-06 03:41 PM, #52
You pointed out the danger.,
(NOT Pro),
07-Sep-06 04:32 PM, #55
RE: You pointed out the danger.,
nepenthe,
07-Sep-06 05:47 PM, #64
Uhm.. Geography.,
(NOT Pro),
07-Sep-06 06:28 PM, #71
Don't marginalize the harm of it however.,
Eskelian,
07-Sep-06 10:18 PM, #76
RE: Don't marginalize the harm of it however.,
Muuloc,
08-Sep-06 01:40 AM, #83
Quick note on that:,
Valguarnera,
08-Sep-06 08:55 AM, #84
RE: Quick note on that:,
Eskelian,
08-Sep-06 09:01 AM, #86
Whoops.,
Valguarnera,
08-Sep-06 09:38 AM, #89
According to Darwyn,
(NOT Pro),
08-Sep-06 10:16 AM, #94
Thats absurd.,
Eskelian,
08-Sep-06 08:55 AM, #85
RE: Don't marginalize the harm of it however.,
Isildur,
08-Sep-06 09:45 AM, #91
Completely rational.,
(NOT Pro),
08-Sep-06 10:17 AM, #95
3.4% of our GNP goes to the military.,
(NOT Pro),
08-Sep-06 10:13 AM, #93
Do you even know what a GNP is?,
Valguarnera,
08-Sep-06 12:43 PM, #102
Military R&D is 72B I think.,
(NOT Pro),
08-Sep-06 07:12 PM, #104
Eventually, we'll be able to kill everyone! ~,
Aodh,
08-Sep-06 09:18 PM, #107
RE: This is a Fallacious argument.,
Muuloc,
08-Sep-06 01:34 AM, #82
Why?,
(NOT Pro),
08-Sep-06 10:18 AM, #96
As a 17 year Veteran....,
(NOT Pro),
06-Sep-06 06:04 PM, #29
RE: As a 17 year Veteran....,
nepenthe,
06-Sep-06 11:07 PM, #34
RE: As a 17 year Veteran....,
(NOT Pro),
07-Sep-06 01:38 AM, #35
RE: As a 17 year Veteran....,
nepenthe,
07-Sep-06 08:53 AM, #37
It's worth noting that:,
Valguarnera,
07-Sep-06 11:04 AM, #40
RE: It's worth noting that:,
nepenthe,
07-Sep-06 01:28 PM, #41
Question:,
Tac,
07-Sep-06 02:02 PM, #42
To me this is the equivilant of saying.,
(NOT Pro),
07-Sep-06 02:09 PM, #44
RE: To me this is the equivilant of saying.,
A2,
07-Sep-06 02:30 PM, #45
Who once said it needed to be in a bubble? Anyone?,
(NOT Pro),
07-Sep-06 04:35 PM, #56
RE: To me this is the equivilant of saying.,
Tac,
07-Sep-06 02:59 PM, #46
RE: To me this is the equivilant of saying.,
Isildur,
07-Sep-06 03:34 PM, #51
RE: To me this is the equivilant of saying.,
Tac,
07-Sep-06 03:58 PM, #53
The fair tax is a Great idea.,
(NOT Pro),
07-Sep-06 04:40 PM, #59
RE: The fair tax is a Great idea.,
Isildur,
07-Sep-06 04:58 PM, #62
Heh. nt,
Wilhath,
07-Sep-06 06:11 PM, #69
RE: To me this is the equivilant of saying.,
Isildur,
07-Sep-06 04:49 PM, #60
One dose of insanity....,
Tac,
07-Sep-06 05:49 PM, #65
30 Million Illegals in 10 years.,
(NOT Pro),
07-Sep-06 04:39 PM, #58
RE: 30 Million Illegals in 10 years.,
Isildur,
07-Sep-06 05:08 PM, #63
It grew.,
(NOT Pro),
07-Sep-06 08:06 PM, #72
I think we should stop ALL immigration,
(NOT Pro),
07-Sep-06 04:37 PM, #57
So can we deport you?,
Tac,
07-Sep-06 05:51 PM, #67
RE: I think we should stop ALL immigration,
Eskelian,
07-Sep-06 10:00 PM, #75
Where I think a lot of you misunderstand me is here....,
(NOT Pro),
08-Sep-06 10:09 AM, #92
RE: To me this is the equivilant of saying.,
Eskelian,
07-Sep-06 09:58 PM, #74
RE: To me this is the equivilant of saying.,
Eshval,
13-Sep-06 12:55 AM, #118
RE: To me this is the equivilant of saying.,
Valkenar,
13-Sep-06 08:39 AM, #120
It's worth noting also that I got seriously ####ed up o...,
(NOT Pro),
07-Sep-06 02:05 PM, #43
Wait till they slash your benefits. ~ (Blackbird),
Aodh,
07-Sep-06 06:26 PM, #70
They keep increasing mine.,
(NOT Pro),
08-Sep-06 10:19 AM, #97
A quote...,
Barduin,
07-Sep-06 04:02 PM, #54
Patriotism is hilarious,
Valkenar,
05-Sep-06 05:29 PM, #22
RE: This essey pretty much sums up my current world vie...,
nepenthe,
05-Sep-06 05:59 PM, #23
Losing would be allowing OUR government to become like ...,
TheLastMohican,
05-Sep-06 08:04 PM, #24
devil's advocate question for the peanut gallery. txt,
Isildur,
06-Sep-06 04:08 PM, #25
RE: devil's advocate question for the peanut gallery. t...,
Tac,
06-Sep-06 04:56 PM #26
I wrote out this whole long thing that the forum ate...,
Wilhath,
06-Sep-06 05:36 PM, #28
RE: devil's advocate,
Valguarnera,
06-Sep-06 05:25 PM, #27
RE: devil's advocate,
(NOT Pro),
06-Sep-06 09:48 PM, #31
No offense Valg, but Pro will never learn.,
TheLastMohican,
06-Sep-06 10:36 PM, #32
Sure he will....,
Tac,
06-Sep-06 10:43 PM, #33
It is a bad topic for this board.,
(NOT Pro),
07-Sep-06 01:54 AM, #36
RE: It is a bad topic for this board.,
Isildur,
07-Sep-06 10:25 AM, #39
RE: It is a bad topic for this board.,
Valkenar,
07-Sep-06 04:53 PM, #61
LAUGH!,
(NOT Pro),
08-Sep-06 07:20 PM, #105
Seek counseling.,
Valguarnera,
07-Sep-06 05:50 PM, #66
*edit*,
Wilhath,
07-Sep-06 06:05 PM, #68
RE: devil's advocate,
Isildur,
07-Sep-06 10:20 AM, #38
RE: This essey pretty much sums up my current world vie...,
Muuloc,
08-Sep-06 01:30 AM, #81
Vague Topic,
Amaranthe,
31-Aug-06 03:39 PM, #3
RE: Vague Topic,
Grurk Muouk,
31-Aug-06 03:53 PM, #4
RE: Vague Topic,
nepenthe,
31-Aug-06 05:50 PM, #5
RE: Vague Topic,
Amaranthe,
31-Aug-06 06:52 PM, #6
RE: Vague Topic,
Eskelian,
31-Aug-06 08:08 PM, #8
RE: Vague Topic,
Isildur,
01-Sep-06 10:56 AM, #9
RE: Vague Topic,
Eskelian,
01-Sep-06 05:11 PM, #10
RE: Vague Topic,
Isildur,
01-Sep-06 11:54 PM, #11
RE: Vague Topic,
Eskelian,
07-Sep-06 09:50 PM, #73
RE: Vague Topic,
nepenthe,
07-Sep-06 11:04 PM, #79
Bingo. n/t,
Eskelian,
08-Sep-06 09:04 AM, #87
RE: Vague Topic,
Tac,
08-Sep-06 09:15 AM, #88
RE: Vague Topic,
nepenthe,
08-Sep-06 10:49 AM, #99
They *are* seperate issues,
Tac,
08-Sep-06 11:42 AM, #100
RE: They *are* seperate issues,
nepenthe,
08-Sep-06 07:28 PM, #106
I gotta ask,
Minyar,
12-Sep-06 01:37 PM, #108
I've been meaning to respond to this.... (Nepenthe's),
Tac,
12-Sep-06 02:43 PM, #109
RE: I've been meaning to respond to this.... (Nepenthe'...,
nepenthe,
12-Sep-06 03:48 PM, #111
RE: I've been meaning to respond to this.... (Nepenthe'...,
Tac,
12-Sep-06 04:30 PM, #112
RE: I've been meaning to respond to this.... (Nepenthe'...,
nepenthe,
12-Sep-06 05:41 PM, #113
Come on now Nep,
Minyar,
12-Sep-06 05:58 PM, #114
Except:,
Valguarnera,
12-Sep-06 08:59 PM, #115
Two words: Turing Test,
Tac,
12-Sep-06 09:19 PM, #116
RE: Two words: Turing Test,
Valguarnera,
12-Sep-06 11:37 PM, #117
RE: Two words: Turing Test,
Tac,
13-Sep-06 08:47 AM, #121
RE: Two words: Turing Test,
Valkenar,
13-Sep-06 09:05 AM, #122
RE: I gotta ask,
nepenthe,
12-Sep-06 03:22 PM, #110
The problem is Choice, Nepenthe,
wretchedmongrel,
13-Sep-06 02:43 AM, #119
RE: Vague Topic,
Isildur,
08-Sep-06 09:38 AM, #90
RE: Vague Topic,
nepenthe,
08-Sep-06 10:40 AM, #98
According to wikipedia....,
Tac,
08-Sep-06 11:46 AM, #101
RE: Vague Topic,
Isildur,
08-Sep-06 12:42 PM, #103
RE: Vague Topic,
Amaranthe,
02-Sep-06 11:20 AM, #12
RE: Vague Topic,
Isildur,
02-Sep-06 11:45 AM, #13
RE: Vague Topic,
Amaranthe,
02-Sep-06 02:45 PM, #14
RE: Vague Topic,
Eskelian,
31-Aug-06 08:07 PM, #7
From my blog eariler this month:,
Grurk Muouk,
31-Aug-06 08:17 AM, #1
RE: From my blog eariler this month:,
Isildur,
31-Aug-06 02:32 PM, #2
RE: From my blog eariler this month:,
Isildur,
02-Sep-06 04:15 PM, #15
| |
|