|
|
Minyar | Mon 15-Dec-08 12:08 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
504 posts
| |
|
#563, "Make Feral Growl not stop warcry or anything else. nt"
|
|
|
 That is very intentional (n/t),
Zulghinlour,
15-Dec-08 03:01 PM, #1
 ok....Then how about this?,
Minyar,
18-Dec-08 12:11 PM, #2
  Don't think this is necessary,
Zulghinlour,
18-Dec-08 12:13 PM, #6
 I'm not sure I understand.,
Minyar,
18-Dec-08 01:00 PM, #8
 RE: I'm not sure I understand.,
Zulghinlour,
18-Dec-08 01:02 PM, #9
 Also...could you please explain why this is intentional...,
Minyar,
17-Dec-08 04:30 PM, #3
 Sure:,
Daevryn,
17-Dec-08 04:32 PM, #4
 Also there's an edge that gives you something like this...,
Dylan,
18-Dec-08 12:11 PM, #5
 You got it (n/t),
Zulghinlour,
18-Dec-08 12:13 PM, #7
| |
|
|
Zulghinlour | Mon 15-Dec-08 03:01 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
9792 posts
| |
|
#564, "That is very intentional (n/t)"
In response to Reply #0
|
n/t So long, and thanks for all the fish!
|
|
|
|
|   |
|
Minyar | Mon 15-Dec-08 03:18 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
504 posts
| |
|
#565, "ok....Then how about this?"
In response to Reply #1
|
Then make an auto or a trust feature that allos someone not to be blessed by a cabal healer, or frenzied by some random person or thing. Those things are sometimes very annoying to a warrior or other class that can call their warcry or berserk or whatever.
|
|
|
|
|     |
|
Zulghinlour | Thu 18-Dec-08 12:13 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
9792 posts
| |
|
#566, "Don't think this is necessary"
In response to Reply #2
|
You can control the cabal healer thing, and I really doubt that there are tons of people running around randomly frenzying folks so they can't warcry/berserk. So long, and thanks for all the fish!
|
|
|
|
|       |
|
Minyar | Thu 18-Dec-08 12:55 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
504 posts
| |
|
#567, "I'm not sure I understand."
In response to Reply #6
|
Do you mean the cabal healer thing controlled by using trust cabal? If you shut that off then you are asking for a world of hurt I would assume. Maybe I just don't know about some command that is out there.
|
|
|
|
|         |
|
Zulghinlour | Thu 18-Dec-08 01:02 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
9792 posts
| |
|
#568, "RE: I'm not sure I understand."
In response to Reply #8
|
>Do you mean the cabal healer thing controlled by using trust >cabal? If you shut that off then you are asking for a world >of hurt I would assume. Maybe I just don't know about some >command that is out there.
A much simpler solution...I mean you don't have to walk into the room, especially if you are not currently affected by warcry. So long, and thanks for all the fish!
|
|
|
|
|   |
|
Minyar | Mon 15-Dec-08 03:19 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
504 posts
| |
|
#569, "Also...could you please explain why this is intentional..."
In response to Reply #1
|
|
|
|     |
|
Daevryn | Wed 17-Dec-08 04:32 PM |
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
| |
|
#570, "Sure:"
In response to Reply #3
|
You're meant to pick one or the other, not be able to have the benefits of both simultaneously.
Presumably, it was also felt that the classes that felar can be that don't have warcry needed a little help more than the classes that do have warcry.
Zulg has a better handle on this than I do in this specific case and may well comment as well.
|
|
|
|
|       |
|
Dylan | Wed 17-Dec-08 06:50 PM |
Member since 17th Dec 2008
14 posts
| |
|
#571, "Also there's an edge that gives you something like this..."
In response to Reply #4
|
|
|
|       |
|
Zulghinlour | Thu 18-Dec-08 12:13 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
9792 posts
| |
|
#572, "You got it (n/t)"
In response to Reply #4
|
n/t So long, and thanks for all the fish!
|
|
|
|
|