You are viewing a read-only archive of the Carrion Fields discussion forums built from a snapshot of the forum database on 2026-08-25. The search page works, though it is not as sophisticated as the old forum search. This archive encompasses approximately 25 years of CF discussion. Today, that discussion continues on Discord (see the main website for a link).

Some of the special-purpose forums are listed below along with their replacements (as of writing):


Subject: "Fiend vs Gaunts" Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top Ask An Immortal Dalteric Topic #18
Show all folders

GranaakWed 23-Nov-05 12:43 PM
Member since 31st Jan 2005
89 posts 		Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to send message via AOL IM
#18, "Fiend vs Gaunts"


          

Gaunt:
The target is either in a protected city when the gaunt arrives or words to one while still under attack. The conjurer is usually warranted I believe?

Fiend:
The target is out of a city when he is fiended and words and then continues to be attacked by the fiend. Is the bard warranted?

Assume the Magistrates on duty have 100% evidence to prove who the attacker was in both cases.


If any of these instances can result in a warrant, is it possible that if the target was a Magistrate they could just recall and warrant the attacker once he is struck again by the gaunt or fiend?


Hope that was clear, just a question I though of while reading some logs.

{SCION} the Archmage of Eternal Night: Say it.

  
Top

DaltericMon 28-Nov-05 10:04 AM
Member since 26th Jun 2005
82 posts 		Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list
#21, "RE: Fiend vs Gaunts"
In response to Reply #0

          

As I've touched on in other places, I generally like to leave most things open to the interpretation of the current mortals in place. That being said, I think the consensus stated, of only illegal if it began within a protected city is probably the most likely/more expected rule of law.

  
Top

OdrirgWed 23-Nov-05 09:18 PM
Member since 16th Oct 2004
431 posts 		Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#20, "Historically..."
In response to Reply #0

          

I've seen a small handful of law characters demoted by the imms of the cabal for flagging in either of these cases (where the original even happened out of a city)

I have no idea what it is now, but in the past it has not been a crime if your target brings the fiend/gaunt into a city by his own actions.

  
Top

TheerklaWed 23-Nov-05 01:21 PM
Member since 04th Mar 2003
1055 posts 		Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#19, "I think that has always been grey area"
In response to Reply #0

          

But I believe, according to the the generally accepted interpretation, you should not get wanted if the initial fiending or gaunting occurred out of a protected area.

  
Top

Top Ask An Immortal Dalteric Topic #18 Previous topic | Next topic