Subject: "Regarding wither - Move longevity?" Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #74009
Show all folders

AdrigonThu 20-Feb-20 01:26 PM
Member since 04th Mar 2003
158 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#74009, "Regarding wither - Move longevity?"


          

Hello,

After playing Antaluvion and loosing some 100+ hours due to failing the save against one (1) wither, I have pondered if there are any creative ways of altering this.

I know there are several voices for change of the commune itself, but I propose that we simply move the elixir of longevity from the area which it is in now, which cannot be accessed by anyone, to a place that is reachable. Say to Tiamat. Or we open up something else that is in character and try to make this an opportunity to further improve upon the game.

Here Daevryn writes that the elixir undoes the aging of wither (if he recalls correctly) http://forums.carrionfields.com/dc/dcboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=6&topic_id=49351

Since it is created by someone who, to my knowledge, is absent from the game I understand it can be hard to get their approval.

But perhaps we can do that or altogether remove that age loss?

Looking forward to your thoughts!

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

IshuliThu 20-Feb-20 01:46 PM
Member since 13th Feb 2017
2146 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#74010, "RE: Regarding wither - Move longevity?"
In response to Reply #0


          

You didn't lose that many hours.

I'm not familiar with the elixir and it's likely meant to be that way.

I'm fine with wither having age penalty consequences.

But I'm always game to read others' thoughts too.

-Ish

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
JavaMon 24-Feb-20 04:18 PM
Member since 07th Apr 2003
1055 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to send message via AOL IM
#74015, "I don't understand the upside of the age penalty."
In response to Reply #1


          

I agree that obstacles and challenges are good for the game. If permanent con-loss wasn't a thing, dying (especially to mobs) would lose pretty much all meaning, and the challenge of trying to stay alive would be meaningless and boring. So that's where I'm coming from. Challenges are good. Obstacles and disincentives to risky behavior are very much necessary.

But the age-loss of wither doesn't actually do that, because its so rare to actually land, and even rarer for that to truly impact a character (since age-deaths are so very rare). It's a non-obstacle, because no one is concerned that it will land. Nor should they be, because the chances of it actually mattering are so close to zero it isn't worth it. Just do the math.. how many times is the wither commune used, and how often does someone age-die prematurely because of it? It isn't even worth considering.

So if it doesn't provide that feeling of "risk" and make the game more fun by introducing a different challenge, what DOES it provide to the game?

All it really does is make it possible that a long-lived and established character will disappear somewhat earlier than normal. Typically, I think we all WANT these long-lived and established characters around. We celebrate characters like Gilversplitz that lived for years, don't we? Wouldn't we have done the same for a well-respected character like Andaluvion? So I don't see how that character disappearing earlier (even if it isn't as dramatic difference as we think) can be seen as a positive.

In short.. the only actual result of the current aging aspect of wither is a negative for the game and for the players. So why keep it as-is?

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
incognitoTue 25-Feb-20 04:03 AM
Member since 04th Mar 2003
4495 posts
Click to add this author to your buddy list
#74025, "RE: I don't understand the upside of the age penalty."
In response to Reply #2


          

Think age loss is quite common if your saves suck.

But the main reason for not changing it is probably a lack of coding resource.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #74009 Previous topic | Next topic