Devil's Advocate,
Jormyr,
02-Jan-20 01:26 AM, #9
In the words of Nililah,
robdarken_,
01-Jan-20 04:41 PM, #8
Seconded.,
Aithiar,
01-Jan-20 08:13 AM, #3
We should be grateful,
incognito,
01-Jan-20 08:19 AM, #4
I doubt it.,
Aithiar,
01-Jan-20 08:52 AM, #5
RE: I doubt it.,
incognito,
01-Jan-20 09:51 AM, #6
Another solution might be,
incognito,
01-Jan-20 09:57 AM, #7
I actually really like this idea.,
Cointreau,
01-Jan-20 05:05 AM, #2
I'd support this,
incognito,
01-Jan-20 03:20 AM, #1
| |
|
Jormyr | Thu 02-Jan-20 01:26 AM |
Member since 31st Dec 2014
423 posts
| |
|
#73759, "Devil's Advocate"
In response to Reply #0
|
While this sounds good in theory, my major concerns would be accusations of favoritism and judgment. We are hardly infallible, and both past history of Immortal objectivity and thoughts of how even I might feel as a player on the bandwagon side if I were to die because of someone actively receiving Immortal help.
That said, I certainly agree with the root idea and some benefit of a form of automation is the removal of possible accusations of unfair bias.
Also, the underdog that does put up the good fight HAS traditionally been the sort to be rewarded, haven't they?
|
|
|
|
  |
incognito | Wed 01-Jan-20 08:19 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
4495 posts
| |
|
#73741, "We should be grateful"
In response to Reply #3
|
These guys never got to pile into Scion. At least, not in recent years.
A pile of scions or scarabs would be worse than a pile of imperials. Particularly if they arrange the mix of classes.
|
|
|
|
      |
incognito | Wed 01-Jan-20 09:50 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
4495 posts
| |
|
#73743, "RE: I doubt it."
In response to Reply #5
Edited on Wed 01-Jan-20 09:51 AM
|
Scarab doesn't particularly promote conflict between members. Pretty sure there's even an internal script that says betrayal of scarabs will be punished.
And in theory, Empire sects aren't meant to be particularly cooperative. People seem to have left behind true intersect infighting.
|
|
|
|
  |
incognito | Wed 01-Jan-20 09:57 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
4495 posts
| |
|
#73744, "Another solution might be"
In response to Reply #3
|
To cut back on the mix of classes empire permits. And make them hunt those that don't have a sect they can rise to lead.
The typical sign of the ooc group in empire is when the classes that can only be citizens appear, to augment the rest.
I'd consider removing healers and bards, and making them, together with muters and shifters, hunted.
You still have arguably the best warrior powers, good ap and necro powers, and decent shadow powers. Necro can do a fair bit in terms of buffing others.
|
|
|
|
|
incognito | Wed 01-Jan-20 03:16 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
4495 posts
| |
|
#73737, "I'd support this"
In response to Reply #0
Edited on Wed 01-Jan-20 03:20 AM
|
Based on what the Twitter feed shows of empire.
It does already happen sometimes though.
When Astina got inducted I hadn't had a chance to refresh myself on the syntax of canal powers when I got raided by a nasty combo, and Panmorne forced me to use the powers, then slapped a couple of field dressings on me himself because of the beating I took while getting the syntax wrong.
|
|
|
|
|