|
Jaegendar | Thu 27-Dec-18 02:48 PM |
Member since 30th May 2014
136 posts
| |
|
#72317, "Unrestrained.castigation of equines in goodie kills as Fortressite"
|
Story time with uncle J.
A month (couple?) I tried my first fortressite as an invoker. Everything was going awesome, I killed a decent chunk of darkies before getting into fortress at around level 16. I become a squire and everything is dandy.
But then, I group up with another mage and retarded assassin. Both of whom were applicants for the fortress, well we are killing trolls when a darkie-healer-pain-in-the-butt makes trouble and we chase each other about as a group, until the assassin decides to blindness dust and kill a freaking tiny guardian. The thing is one rounded, and I am left banging my forehead against my keyboard. I call off the group and the chase of the darkie and try to fix the screw up.
I: 1.- Sent a note to fortress about needing a spanking for being a bad goodie 2.- Sent a pray requesting that my bottom be smitten for being naughty 3.- Speak to a nice elf warrior who seems to have messed up as well and get told to castigate some forest burners so the tiny guardian feels better about himself while planting seeds with Ergush in the afterlife.
Did all that, nobody said anything to me. And I remembered a post here from the fortress imms, saying that the first one is on the house. But I can't stop feeling that the axe will eventually drop, aka. I can feel the heartbeat under the floorboards. So I basically deleted, because I can't help feeling that my char is now tainted.
I really, don't know what I would be asking for. Getting punished for killing goodies as a fortress is entirely reasonable, feeling that my char is tainted because of some moron is also not cool. So I am lost, and this ends up being just "Story time with uncle J".
Maybe being a goodie is too anathema to my being, that or I should only try chars that can solo level if I want to go goodie.
Thank you for listening, and please do tune in for my next rant/story infront of the fireplace with a nice cup of coffee.
Cheers.
|
|
|
|
RE: Unrestrained.castigation of equines in goodie kills...,
Thaedan (Anonymous),
28-Dec-18 04:20 PM, #18
Add it to your role and deal with it IC?,
Marcus_,
28-Dec-18 08:30 AM, #8
You're a Korsgaard follower,
Kstatida,
28-Dec-18 08:18 AM, #7
RE: Unrestrained.castigation of equines in goodie kills...,
Jhyrbian,
27-Dec-18 03:38 PM, #3
This is a terrible story,
Java,
27-Dec-18 03:00 PM, #1
Define terrible.,
Jaegendar,
27-Dec-18 03:26 PM, #2
Because..,
Java,
27-Dec-18 03:40 PM, #4
RE: Because..,
Jaegendar,
27-Dec-18 03:43 PM, #5
Sorry, I lied. I actually do know the fix.,
Java,
27-Dec-18 04:04 PM, #6
There is the threat of being delayed from Maran for a c...,
JohnEveryMan,
28-Dec-18 09:02 AM, #9
You're still making stuff up,
Java,
28-Dec-18 09:32 AM, #10
Oh right meant to post this from my Jaegandaer acc,
JohnEveryMan,
28-Dec-18 11:31 AM, #11
Having done it at least once..,
Java,
28-Dec-18 11:47 AM, #12
Emo is clearly the most effective and expedient route,
JohnEveryMan,
28-Dec-18 12:35 PM, #13
Clearly. Based on.. your preconceptions and literally n...,
Java,
28-Dec-18 03:42 PM, #15
So you're arguing against annecdotal evidence with anne...,
JohnEveryMan,
28-Dec-18 04:18 PM, #17
He deleted despite having absolutely no consequences. H...,
Java,
28-Dec-18 04:39 PM, #19
Roles are the fun of CF,
lasentia,
28-Dec-18 03:16 PM, #14
I don't disagree with anything you said.,
JohnEveryMan,
28-Dec-18 04:12 PM, #16
| |
|
|
#72339, "RE: Unrestrained.castigation of equines in goodie kills..."
In response to Reply #0
|
You really do get a mulligan on goodie kill #1 unless you role-play it poorly or there's reason to believe you were truly negligent.
It does make it more likely you're punished in some way for #2.
That said, you're not evaluated in a vacuum, and both the individual circumstances of the kill *and* your overall contribution to the cabal would likely be considered.
Some other thoughts:
1. You mentioned maybe goodies aren't your thing. It's worth noting this is really only a Fortress thing. While no good-aligned character should be blasé about killing innocents, unless it's excessive you're probably only going to face repercussions if your goodie is in Fortress.
2. Might want to lay off using the term "darkie". It has an unfortunate prior meaning outside CF.
|
|
|
|
|
Kstatida | Fri 28-Dec-18 08:18 AM |
Member since 12th Feb 2015
2214 posts
| |
|
#72327, "You're a Korsgaard follower"
In response to Reply #0
|
|
|
|
Jhyrbian | Thu 27-Dec-18 03:38 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
919 posts
| |
|
#72320, "RE: Unrestrained.castigation of equines in goodie kills..."
In response to Reply #0
|
So you admittedly deleted because of your own insecurities, what do you want from the rest of us?
|
|
|
|
  |
Jaegendar | Thu 27-Dec-18 03:26 PM |
Member since 30th May 2014
136 posts
| |
|
#72319, "Define terrible."
In response to Reply #1
|
I thought I did a very good job writing that, Lol.
But yeah, like I mentioned, the char just felt tainted even though like you said I think I reacted like a goodie would. Maybe I've got too high standards for a goodie?. For example I can't imagine how I could justify killing a neutral guildguard to get to a darkie.
I don't know how to fix that. The only thing that comes to mind is the following:
A contraption in the side of the courtyard in the fortress with a lever.
You pull it and and booming mechanical voice can be heard saying 'tsk tsk tsk'.
You suddenly feel the back of your clothing being pulled as you are slightly raised off the ground by a weird mechanical claw.
Whirring sounds can be heard as big gauntled hand on a pole separates itself from the wall.
A holy redemption claw's Beating EVISCERATES you! A holy redemption claw's Beating EVISCERATES you! A Redemption machine says 'Who's been a bad goodie!!!?' A holy redemption claw's Beating EVISCERATES you! A holy redemption claw's Beating EVISCERATES you!
As the redemption claw releases you, you feel relieved of your sins.
A Redemption machine says 'Now go and spread the light with your beautiful soul, you.'
J.
|
|
|
|
      |
Jaegendar | Thu 27-Dec-18 03:43 PM |
Member since 30th May 2014
136 posts
| |
|
#72322, "RE: Because.."
In response to Reply #4
|
Yup, like I said. It ends up being just a story, don't know the fix.
|
|
|
|
          |
JohnEveryMan | Fri 28-Dec-18 09:02 AM |
Member since 25th Aug 2012
247 posts
| |
|
#72329, "There is the threat of being delayed from Maran for a c..."
In response to Reply #6
|
And it is certainly felt whether tangible or not, i.e deleting his character because tiny tree planting man was killed by dumb groupie.
The potential for being a squire for half your characters life and having a grand total of one cabal power bars fun in a PK intensive RP game and might explain why 90% of squires are newbs who don't know better and weren't going to make more than pity-Maran before con death anyway assuming they hang around that long.
In a world where you kill literally thousands of people and creatures for guild recognition why would anyone self-flagellate over accidentally-ed a sprite one time.
Sent from my Iphone
|
|
|
|
            | |
              |
JohnEveryMan | Fri 28-Dec-18 11:31 AM |
Member since 25th Aug 2012
247 posts
| |
|
#72332, "Oh right meant to post this from my Jaegandaer acc"
In response to Reply #10
|
My last question is games are supposed to be fun, do trite redemption arcs over a completely inconsequential first offense mob kills qualify as fun?
Sent from my Iphone
|
|
|
|
                |
Java | Fri 28-Dec-18 11:47 AM |
Member since 07th Apr 2003
1055 posts
| |
|
#72333, "Having done it at least once.."
In response to Reply #11
|
I'd say yes.
In that I enjoy playing a role. Sometimes that means doing something stupid or annoying, because that's what my character would do.
Now here's where I almost agree with you: The formulaic response "write note, be emo with Aurew, collect X amount of coins for the victim" can be pretty boring (except the Aurew part at least). But that's only one option, it isn't the only one.
What would your character do? Maybe he'd go to the Inn and get absolutely sloshed, then go on a drunken killing spree first, burying his axe in every red aura he saw. Or maybe he'd lay down his weapons indefinitely and take up a life of peace. None of that really matters. The important thing is that you play a character that actually responds to his own actions. And good people killing other good people, even on accident, is a pretty traumatic event. If you shrug it off, you're probably not as good as you think you are.
PS. Other people are playing characters too. You can't expect them to abandon their own role because you don't want to really play yours.
|
|
|
|
                  |
JohnEveryMan | Fri 28-Dec-18 12:29 PM |
Member since 25th Aug 2012
247 posts
| |
|
#72334, "Emo is clearly the most effective and expedient route"
In response to Reply #12
Edited on Fri 28-Dec-18 12:35 PM
|
Similar to how most tribs start collections for grieving widows when they #### up. It's as bad as ignoring it completely. The emphasis of consistent RP isn't lost on me but when you're effectively reciting a soliloquy at a wall because your groupie involuntarily dragged you into killing a mob at 3am the immersion factor is questionable.
In that case should your character be at risk of punishment and to what degree?
If so then being held back isn't an unreasonable fear, if not then then the discussion of not wanting to play your role is moot.
Adding the possibility of dozens of extra hours onto a game that is objectively already a massive time-sink doesn't benefit anyone. Then again that's just the kind of game this is.
PS. Aurew is still alive? That's impressive.
Sent from my Iphone
|
|
|
|
                    | |
                      |
JohnEveryMan | Fri 28-Dec-18 04:18 PM |
Member since 25th Aug 2012
247 posts
| |
|
#72338, "So you're arguing against annecdotal evidence with anne..."
In response to Reply #15
|
"The only people that I've seen that have ever gotten the hammer dropped are people don't roleplay anything (ie, "Eh, it happens. Move on"), or people who do it repeatedly without trying to avoid it."
Jaegendar deleted over it, I take it he's convinced.
Obviously you're the authority on the subject, thanks for your input.
Sent from my Iphone
|
|
|
|
                        | |
                  |
lasentia | Fri 28-Dec-18 03:16 PM |
Member since 27th Apr 2010
987 posts
| |
|
#72335, "Roles are the fun of CF"
In response to Reply #12
|
If you're going Maran, and I mean hard core Maran where there is an end all be all for service to the light, RP can really shine. When that Noob ****s up and brings some goodie NPC into a fight and gets it killed, you have a ton of RP options.
Me, I say just go bat #### and try to kill the offender, aura be damned. He may have a golden aura, but his actions show his heart, and he must pay the ultimate price for his transgression into darkness. Really, you're doing a favor in slaughtering him before he descends into the darkness further. The Maran judges based on what he sees. Be it duergar, drow, storm or elf, if you are murdering an innocent dwarf, intentional or not, you die. If you are so careless as to accidentally kill the light, you are not worthy to have that mantles.
Playing a character is different for each player, but for some people it really is, what would my character, not what would I do. If I'm an impulsive drunken dwarf warrior of the light who just witnesses an elf invoker accidentally burninate some hapless dwarf child, I am instantly going after him. Cause, as a char once said to me, an irate dwarf is an irate dwarf. And **** that sissy long eared pansy and his magic loving arse.
Unfortunately the "game" aspect of CF often interferes with making it a truly great RP game for everyone involved, because these actions can have crippling consequences. In fantasy lore, a betrayer does not all the sudden forget how to use swords they used their whole life because he kills another elf.
I honestly think betrayer and the like status should not be as rare, but also should not penalize characters in any way other than comes with being of that alignment. (and maybe the added vulns, sure)
But a game has to have rules to make it predictable so players can power game to their hearts content, and become boring in the long run.
What I'm really getting at is CF needs a giant shot of chaotic randomness in it to invigorate what tends to be a stagnant environment. Rules to a large extent hamper the player's ability to truly play a role out.
|
|
|
|
                    |
JohnEveryMan | Fri 28-Dec-18 04:12 PM |
Member since 25th Aug 2012
247 posts
| |
|
#72337, "I don't disagree with anything you said."
In response to Reply #14
|
|
|
|