Subject: "Shifter -age EQ not carrying over in form" Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #69260
Show all folders

Shifter Suggestion Person (Anonymous)Thu 16-Nov-17 06:31 PM
Charter member
#69260, "Shifter -age EQ not carrying over in form"


          

A suggestion for shapeshifters...

Allow -age EQ to work in form like -svs EQ does.

Rationale:

A lot of EQ does not benefit shifters because many EQ attributes do not carry over: AC, hit, dam, resistance mods, age mods, progs...

While I'd like more things to carry over to give shifters more EQ options, the age modifier seems like a no brainer. All the others would make a form more powerful in combat. Age only allows the same benefit to shifters that everyone else has. If you're old, can wear -age gear and live longer (until you are killed that is). It seems that to do this as a shifter, you can never shift into form again.

Is that a reasonable change to make?

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Reply Sorry, probably not gonna happen any time soon. (nt), Umiron, 21-Nov-17 05:40 PM, #17
Reply I suggested it before., Murphy, 17-Nov-17 03:03 AM, #3
Reply Why? nt, TJHuron, 17-Nov-17 12:22 AM, #1
     Reply B/c, Kstatida, 17-Nov-17 01:06 AM, #2
     Reply RE: Why? nt, Shifter Suggestion Person (Anonymous), 17-Nov-17 10:35 AM, #4
          Reply I didn't realize this was a thing people did, TJHuron, 17-Nov-17 12:13 PM, #5
               Reply Very very few people do., lasentia, 17-Nov-17 03:05 PM, #6
                    Reply See the changes forum, Murphy, 17-Nov-17 03:12 PM, #7
                    Reply RE: Very very few people do., Shifter Suggestion Person (Anonymous), 17-Nov-17 03:14 PM, #8
                         Reply It's not restriction, so.much as specifically making it..., Jormyr, 17-Nov-17 04:20 PM, #9
                              Reply RE: It's not restriction, so.much as specifically makin..., Shifter Suggestion Person (Anonymous), 17-Nov-17 06:18 PM, #10
                              Reply Maybe you could make it an edge? nt, k-b, 17-Nov-17 06:24 PM, #11
                                   Reply RE: Maybe you could make it an edge? nt, Jormyr, 18-Nov-17 04:58 AM, #12
                                   Reply Gotcha. nt, k-b, 19-Nov-17 01:31 PM, #13
                                   Reply If we went that route, Ysaloerye, 20-Nov-17 01:54 PM, #14
                                        Reply That sounds interesting, k-b, 20-Nov-17 07:27 PM, #15
                                             Reply No, Shifter Suggestion Person (Anonymous), 21-Nov-17 03:29 PM, #16
                                                  Reply I think, perhaps..., k-b, 21-Nov-17 05:44 PM, #18
                                                       Reply RE: I think, perhaps..., Shifter Suggestion Person (Anonymous), 21-Nov-17 06:19 PM, #19

UmironTue 21-Nov-17 05:40 PM
Member since 29th May 2017
1499 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list
#69301, "Sorry, probably not gonna happen any time soon. (nt)"
In response to Reply #0


          

nt

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

MurphyFri 17-Nov-17 03:03 AM
Member since 30th Dec 2010
1639 posts
Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#69265, "I suggested it before."
In response to Reply #0


          

Was told they see no reason to change things from what they are.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

TJHuronFri 17-Nov-17 12:22 AM
Member since 28th Nov 2007
1132 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list
#69262, "Why? nt"
In response to Reply #0


          

Nt

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
KstatidaFri 17-Nov-17 01:06 AM
Member since 12th Feb 2015
2214 posts
Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list
#69263, "B/c"
In response to Reply #1


          

Murphy wants to play long-living felar shifters.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
Shifter Suggestion Person (Anonymous)Fri 17-Nov-17 10:35 AM
Charter member
#69267, "RE: Why? nt"
In response to Reply #1


          

Other chars can extend their lives by wearing -age eq once they are very old if they do not get killed. When they get killed of course the eq comes off and they die of old age.

For a shifter who is trying to prolong his life the same way cannot shift into form because the -age doesn't carry over to form so they will die of old age as if they had been killed.

Can you think of a reason why a long lived shifter char shouldn't be able to use this mechanic like any other long lived char?

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
TJHuronFri 17-Nov-17 12:13 PM
Member since 28th Nov 2007
1132 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list
#69268, "I didn't realize this was a thing people did"
In response to Reply #4


          

But to answer your question no, I suppose I can't, except that some classes have drawbacks.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
lasentiaFri 17-Nov-17 03:05 PM
Member since 27th Apr 2010
987 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list
#69275, "Very very few people do."
In response to Reply #5


          

Wearing -age gear is only an issue for less than 1% of characters ever. And probably less than 10% of those are shifters. So your answer is probably the best explanation.

So this change would really only impact Murphy and maybe heralds, as they are the only ones that:
a) play a char long enough without con dying
b) will actually do so with a shifter and not get bored enough to delete.

But Murphy wants 2000 hour lifespans so no age gear ever really matters to him (And I agree, I wanted longer lifespans too but we're more a minority as very few ever play to age death)

I wore -age gear on Allysia, but that was about it. I would say it gave me maybe 5 extra hours, but that was on an elf that ages quite rapidly in terms of hours played to years. Likely more noticeable on say an arial/felar, but even then the returns are probably not that great, unless you are stacking a ton of -age gear. And even then, you're now playing with zero deaths, which is far less fun to play when you're clinging to a character.

What I'd like to know is if I roll a new char that is age 20, and happen upon -30 years of gear, what happens if I wear it?

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
MurphyFri 17-Nov-17 03:12 PM
Member since 30th Dec 2010
1639 posts
Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#69276, "See the changes forum"
In response to Reply #6
Edited on Fri 17-Nov-17 03:12 PM

          

If you are 20 years old and you wear -30 years worth of gear, you die instantly. (Not permanently.)

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
Shifter Suggestion Person (Anonymous)Fri 17-Nov-17 03:14 PM
Charter member
#69277, "RE: Very very few people do."
In response to Reply #6


          

First, I'm not Murphy.

Second, you kind of made my point. This only affects long lived characters who are doing things. So, why would you want to not allow them to take advantage of this very small perk of -age gear because they are a shifter.

When there's no good reason to have a restriction like this in place, that's when you get rid of it.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                    
JormyrFri 17-Nov-17 04:20 PM
Member since 31st Dec 2014
423 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#69278, "It's not restriction, so.much as specifically making it..."
In response to Reply #8


          

Gear works when worn. Shifters are weird in that for the most part, you're a new person w/o gear. I assume that design used your current max HP/Mana/erc, but then saves, etc had to be specifically coded. Similarly, I assume effort would have to be place toake the age thing happen.

The return on investment just isn't there in the staff view.

Classes, races, etc are mechanically different to encourage the uniqueness of each. If you want to live a really, really long time, play an elf. Ironically, this gear has little impact on them. Biggest impact are for orcs, arial, felar. Arial being the one race I used a bit of this for. On the same note, I've also had an orc die to wearing an Uber axe w/ +age gear, so I guess that's a wash.

Personally, I feel the bigger issue is that +/- age gear exists with any amount of commonality. The mechanical effect is mostly non-existent, until there's too much, then it's nonsensical.

As an aside, the code changes regarding -age was after happening to see someone run around at age 0. Sadly, I couldn't convince Scarabaeus to make it so you revert to nonexistence and deletes the character. Also, I am totally finding an excuse for an Uber fountain of age/youth type gear that's like the best piece of gear in the game, except +/- like 10,000 years.

Thinking about that, guess it'll have to be no-undead, too, but...yeah, totally making that.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                        
Shifter Suggestion Person (Anonymous)Fri 17-Nov-17 06:18 PM
Charter member
#69279, "RE: It's not restriction, so.much as specifically makin..."
In response to Reply #9


          

Thanks for the reply. I was thinking that it might just be a flag that could be set for the age attrib, but if it's a time investment, it's definitely not worth the return.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                        
k-bFri 17-Nov-17 06:24 PM
Member since 19th Mar 2010
344 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#69280, "Maybe you could make it an edge? nt"
In response to Reply #9


          

nt

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                            
JormyrSat 18-Nov-17 04:58 AM
Member since 31st Dec 2014
423 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#69284, "RE: Maybe you could make it an edge? nt"
In response to Reply #11


          

If I had to guess, even to make it an edge would require having the basic system in place to allow the edge to say "yeah, take age gear into account". At that point, may as well just make the gear do that.

Shifters are one of those really weird setups that made something cool happen, but doing so made a lot of things fuxxoredly weird and haxxored to do it.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                
k-bSun 19-Nov-17 01:31 PM
Member since 19th Mar 2010
344 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#69293, "Gotcha. nt"
In response to Reply #12


          

nt

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                            
YsaloeryeMon 20-Nov-17 01:54 PM
Member since 09th Apr 2006
315 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#69294, "If we went that route"
In response to Reply #11


  

          

Then I would probably think it would be like the the vitality edge, where you could take a -10 years, multiple times, getting more expensive each time.
Again, requires some coding to do.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                
k-bMon 20-Nov-17 07:27 PM
Member since 19th Mar 2010
344 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#69295, "That sounds interesting"
In response to Reply #14


          

It would give those who want super long lived characters an option. Sort of like a compromise. I like it.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                    
Shifter Suggestion Person (Anonymous)Tue 21-Nov-17 03:29 PM
Charter member
#69300, "No"
In response to Reply #15


          

The whole suggestion was to remove a restriction that shouldn't be there in the first place. Not to make anything cost me edge points.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                        
k-bTue 21-Nov-17 05:44 PM
Member since 19th Mar 2010
344 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#69302, "I think, perhaps..."
In response to Reply #16


          

You don't get the idea of 'compromise'.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                                            
Shifter Suggestion Person (Anonymous)Tue 21-Nov-17 06:19 PM
Charter member
#69303, "RE: I think, perhaps..."
In response to Reply #18


          

Compromise is when you have two opposing views and you find a solution that makes both sides as happy as possible.

I haven't heard anyone with the view that shifters should be unable to use the same age mechanics as every other class.

The explanation I heard was that it wasn't intentional, but to make age carry over into form would take real coding that may not be worth the investment.

Then, you suggest making it into an edge which would require even more coding.

Ysal's idea of a -10 years edge would only really help short lived races and would still leave shifters being treated differently when it comes to age mechanics.

But, I would rather it stay the way it is then to allow every player to have +10 years (or more) because I'm not sure that would be a good idea.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #69260 Previous topic | Next topic