|
jalbrin | Tue 17-Jan-17 03:30 PM |
Member since 20th Apr 2009
211 posts
| |
|
#66590, "Please unban Matrik"
|
The guy was always a top quality rp'er and a decent player to have around. I understand he had one bad drunken night, but he's been banned for a year. Furthermore, he's respected that ban; at any point he could have, like most other banned players do, used a proxy. Instead he respected your wishes that he not play the game.
I'd ask you balance that against one bad night and let him play again.
|
|
|
|
Locking this thread,
Destuvius,
17-Jan-17 06:20 PM, #13
He's a net positive for the game. Even when he's drunk...,
TMNS,
17-Jan-17 05:49 PM, #11
Please do.,
Athioles,
17-Jan-17 04:14 PM, #8
+3 n/t,
Lhydia,
17-Jan-17 04:10 PM, #7
Not the process.,
Jormyr,
17-Jan-17 03:45 PM, #4
He did email them,
jalbrin,
17-Jan-17 03:57 PM, #5
Don't mess up Matrik's plea,
Kstatida,
17-Jan-17 04:05 PM, #6
You're wrong on this one Boris.,
Athioles,
17-Jan-17 04:20 PM, #9
Then it comes down to my above post.,
Jormyr,
17-Jan-17 04:39 PM, #10
I've witnessed IMMs do worse things than he did and be ...,
Lhydia,
17-Jan-17 05:56 PM, #12
Cosign.,
Murphy,
17-Jan-17 03:37 PM, #3
+1,
Retan,
17-Jan-17 03:37 PM, #2
Seconded. n/t,
Homard,
17-Jan-17 03:36 PM, #1
| |
|
TMNS | Tue 17-Jan-17 05:49 PM |
Member since 10th Jun 2009
2670 posts
| |
|
#66601, "He's a net positive for the game. Even when he's drunk..."
In response to Reply #0
|
|
|
|
Athioles | Tue 17-Jan-17 04:14 PM |
Member since 09th Jan 2011
392 posts
| |
|
#66598, "Please do."
In response to Reply #0
|
He made a mistake. That aside he was a great asset to the game, especially to new players.
Pardon him Scar. Show us you're a merciful lichlord.
|
|
|
|
|
Lhydia | Tue 17-Jan-17 04:10 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
2391 posts
| |
|
#66597, "+3 n/t"
In response to Reply #0
|
|
|
|
Jormyr | Tue 17-Jan-17 03:45 PM |
Member since 31st Dec 2014
423 posts
| |
|
#66594, "Not the process."
In response to Reply #0
|
While I can appreciate the vote of confidence, the way for him to go about this is to e-mail the imps to ask the question.
Not saying this will get him a yes and unbanned, but it's the only process that *might* ever get him unbanned. Just be ready to hear "no".
(I don't know how the question would end up, that's just how that works).
|
|
|
|
  |
jalbrin | Tue 17-Jan-17 03:57 PM |
Member since 20th Apr 2009
211 posts
| |
|
#66595, "He did email them"
In response to Reply #4
|
And the response was "How can we know you won't do it again?"
My post above is a response to that.
|
|
|
|
    |
Kstatida | Tue 17-Jan-17 04:05 PM |
Member since 12th Feb 2015
2214 posts
| |
|
#66596, "Don't mess up Matrik's plea"
In response to Reply #5
|
I mean having a whiteknighting bunch has a habit of making it worse for a person in question.
|
|
|
|
      |
Athioles | Tue 17-Jan-17 04:20 PM |
Member since 09th Jan 2011
392 posts
| |
|
#66599, "You're wrong on this one Boris."
In response to Reply #6
|
Given what happened it's reasonable to assume that the imms think Matrik is a griefer. If that's the case it's good for them to know that he's well liked and respected by most of the players.
|
|
|
|
    |
Jormyr | Tue 17-Jan-17 04:39 PM |
Member since 31st Dec 2014
423 posts
| |
|
#66600, "Then it comes down to my above post."
In response to Reply #5
|
Be prepared to receive an answer of "no".
Though, at that point the whole deal's sorta mute. So long as this thread remains under control, I'm good with it.
|
|
|
|
|
Murphy | Tue 17-Jan-17 03:37 PM |
Member since 30th Dec 2010
1639 posts
| |
|
#66593, "Cosign."
In response to Reply #0
|
|
|
|
Retan | Tue 17-Jan-17 03:37 PM |
Member since 14th Oct 2011
218 posts
| |
|
#66592, "+1"
In response to Reply #0
|
I would like to put a second vote on this.I know he is a bit of a dink, but he has been gone a year and many of us would like to see him come back (as long as he doesn't drink and play lol)
|
|
|
|
|
Homard | Tue 17-Jan-17 03:36 PM |
Member since 10th Apr 2010
959 posts
| |
|
#66591, "Seconded. n/t"
In response to Reply #0
|
|
|
|