|
|
TJHuron | Mon 05-Sep-16 10:06 AM |
Member since 28th Nov 2007
1132 posts
|    |
|
#64794, "I'm wondering if this is actually true"
|
http://www.qhcf.net/phorum/read.php?2,1086660,1086666#msg-1086666
The part about STSF and adjusted int/wis. I felt like I had a few fights as Hal where it charged pretty quickly after a cranial. Enough so that I thought it a valid tactic to open with a cranial on certain characters, but, then I saw this and began to second guess the move.
|
|
|
|
|
Umiron | Mon 05-Sep-16 10:12 AM |
Member since 29th May 2017
1497 posts
| |
|
#64795, "RE: I'm wondering if this is actually true"
In response to Reply #0
|
Always was and still is current (modified) int/wis, both for the striking warrior and the target.
|
|
|
|
| |
|
TJHuron | Mon 05-Sep-16 10:41 AM |
Member since 28th Nov 2007
1132 posts
| |
|
#64797, "Thank you for the answer nt"
In response to Reply #1
|
|
|
| |
|
N b M | Tue 06-Sep-16 08:12 AM |
Member since 29th Sep 2005
444 posts
|  |
|
#64804, "RE: I'm wondering if this is actually true"
In response to Reply #1
|
Is it possible that something was adjusted for a period of time circa 2011 without being tracked?
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Umiron | Tue 06-Sep-16 09:54 AM |
Member since 29th May 2017
1497 posts
| |
|
#64805, "RE: I'm wondering if this is actually true"
In response to Reply #3
|
I know for certain it's worked that way since January of 2010 and I'm reasonably confident that it did so prior to then as well.
|
|
|
|
| |
|
TMNS | Tue 06-Sep-16 11:37 AM |
Member since 10th Jun 2009
2670 posts
| |
|
#64806, "I think the change around that time was..."
In response to Reply #3
|
...headgear could lessen malediction affects from incarnadine and cranial.
I have no access to the code, so this is with no fact-checking.
|
|
|
|
|
